Risk factors associated with the detection and missed diagnosis of colorectal flat adenoma: a Chinese multicenter observational study

References

• Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:89–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ignjatovic A, Saunders BP. Non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms are relatively common worldwide. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:417–429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rex DK, Hewett DG, Snover DC. Editorial: detection targets for colonoscopy: from variable detection to validation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2665–2669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Soetikno R. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut. 2008;57:1406–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahi CJ, Anderson JC, Waxman I, et al. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1301–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitoh Y, Obara T, Watari J, et al. Invasion depth diagnosis of depressed type early colorectal cancers by combined use of videoendoscopy and chromoendoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:362–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KS, Kim IT, Shin KS, et al. Comparison of the clinicopathologic features between flat and polypoid adenoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:1116–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasisi F, Rex DK. Improving protection against proximal colon cancer by colonoscopy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;5:745–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Nugent Z, Mahmud SM, et al. Predictors of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:663–673. quiz 674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arain MA, Sawhney M, Sheikh S, et al. CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1189–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart K, Bannert C, Dunkler D, et al. Prevalence of flat lesions in a large screening population and their role in colonoscopy quality improvement. Endoscopy. 2013;45:350–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:S16–S28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco MA, Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia: an Italian multicenter observational study. Endoscopy. 2010;42:279–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA. 2008;299:1027–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenbach T, McGill SK, Kalidindi V, et al. Proficiency in the diagnosis of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm yields high adenoma detection rates. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:764–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolas-Perez D, Parra-Blanco A, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, et al. Risk factors associated with colorectal flat adenoma detection. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25:302–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee TJ, Rutter MD, Blanks RG, et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut. 2012;61:1050–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:965–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millan MS, Gross P, Manilich E, et al. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1217–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muto T, Kamiya J, Sawada T, et al. Small “flat adenoma” of the large bowel with special reference to its clinicopathologic features. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:847–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, et al. Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut. 2002;51:550–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, et al. A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom. Am J Gastroenterology. 2003;98:2543–2549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park DH, Kim HS, Kim WH, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and malignant potential of colorectal flat neoplasia compared with that of polypoid neoplasia. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:43–49; discussion 49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl J, Halphen M, Kloess HR, et al. Impact of the quality of bowel cleansing on the efficacy of colonic cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paspatis GA, Tribonias G, Manolaraki MM, et al. Deep sedation compared with moderate sedation in polyp detection during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:e137–e144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C, et al. Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1218–1224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolligs FT, Crispin A, Munte A, et al. Risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia according to age and gender. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen SP, Bent S, Chen YH, et al. Gender as a risk factor for advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:676–681. e1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Hoffmeister M. Sex, age, and birth cohort effects in colorectal neoplasms: a cohort analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:697–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurome M, Kato J, Nawa T, et al. Risk factors for high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in colorectal adenoma cases treated with endoscopic polypectomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;20:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adachi M, Okinaga K, Muto T. Flat adenoma of the large bowel: re-evaluation with special reference to central depression. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:782–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondagh EJ, Masclee AA, van der Valk ME, et al. Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms: gender differences in prevalence and malignant potential. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:80–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein JL, Okcu M, Preisegger KH, et al. Distribution, size and shape of colorectal adenomas as determined by a colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate: influence of age, sex and colonoscopy indication. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4:438–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solís-Muñoz P, Solís-Herruzo JA, Rodríguez-Muñoz S. Experience of the endoscopist increases detection rates of smaller size and higher histological grade polyps. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:1237–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vișovan II, Tanțău M, Pascu O, et al. The role of narrow band imaging in colorectal polyp detection. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2017;17:152–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterology. 2002;97:1296–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao ZY, Guan YG, Li BR, et al. Detection and miss rates of autofluorescence imaging of adenomatous and polypoid lesions during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E226–E235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dik VK, Moons LM, Siersema PD. Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy. WJG. 2014;20:2200–2211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Hara T, Kitagawa Y, et al. Linked-color imaging improves endoscopic visibility of colorectal nongranular flat lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:692–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda T, Kawano H, Chiu HM. Screening colonoscopy: what is the most reliable modality for the detection and characterization of colorectal lesions? Dig Endosc. 2015;27:25–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahi CJ, Hewett DG, Rex DK. Relationship of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms to quality of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:407–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar