Clinical results and microbiota changes after faecal microbiota transplantation for chronic pouchitis: a pilot study

References

• Hata K, Ishihara S, Nozawa H, et al. Pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: diagnosis, management, risk factors, and incidence. Dig Endosc. 2017;29(1):26–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio V, Kiran R, Remzi F, et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):679–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandborn W. Pouchitis following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: definition, pathogenesis, and treatment. Gastroenterology 1994;107(6):1856–1860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen B. Acute and chronic pouchitis–pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9(6):323–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal JP, Oke S, Hold GL, et al. Systematic review: ileoanal pouch microbiota in health and disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47(4):466–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchesi J, Adams D, Fava F, et al. The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier. Gut. 2016;65(2):330–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannock GW, Lawley B, Munro K, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the bacterial content of stool from patients with chronic pouchitis, normal pouches, or familial adenomatous polyposis pouches. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(5):925–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen B, Achkar J, Lashner B, et al. Endoscopic and histologic evaluation together with symptom assessment are required to diagnose pouchitis. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(2):261–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs K, Sandler R, Abreu M, et al. Rifaximin for the treatment of active pouchitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13(10):1250–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen N, Zhang B, Holubar SD, et al. Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;(5):CD001176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herfarth H, Long M, Isaacs K. Use of biologics in pouchitis: a systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2015;49(8):647–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimura T, Rizzello F, Helwig U, et al. Once daily high dose probiotic therapy (VSL#3) for maintaining remission in recurrent or refractory pouchitis. Gut. 2004;53(1):108–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal J, Ding N, Worley G, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the management of chronic refractory pouchitis with an evidence-based treatment algorithm. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45(5):581–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirata A, Uchino M, Bando T, et al. Long-term outcomes and sex differences after restorative proctocolectomy in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(3):454–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quraishi M, Widlak M, Bhala N, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(5):479–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingarden A, González A, Vázquez-Baeza Y, et al. Dynamic changes in short- and long-term bacterial composition following fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Microbiome. 2015;3(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahinas D, Silverman M, Sittler T, et al. Toward an understanding of changes in diversity associated with fecal microbiome transplantation based on 16S rRNA gene deep sequencing. MBio. 2012;3(5):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello SP, Hughes PA, Waters O, et al. Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on 8-week remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. JAMA. 2019;321(2):156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paramsothy S, Kamm MA, Kaakoush NO, et al. Multidonor intensive faecal microbiota transplantation for active ulcerative colitis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1218–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moayyedi P, Surette MG, Kim PT, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation induces remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis in a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(1):102–109.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossen NG, Fuentes S, Van Der Spek MJ, et al. Findings from a randomized controlled trial of fecal transplantation for patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(1):110–118.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang S, Kraft CS, Dhere T, et al. Successful treatment of chronic pouchitis utilizing fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT): a case report. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31(5):1093–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy J, Walker AW, Li JV, et al. Variable alterations of the microbiota, without metabolic or immunological change, following faecal microbiota transplantation in patients with chronic pouchitis. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):12955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid M, Frick JS, Malek N, et al. Successful treatment of pouchitis with Vedolizumab, but not fecal microbiota transfer (FMT), after proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(4):597–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stallmach A, Lange K, Buening J, et al. Fecal microbiota transfer in patients with chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(3):441–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida A, Imaeda H, Inatomi O, et al. The efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for patients with chronic pouchitis: a case series. Clin Case Rep. 2019;7(4):782–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herfarth H, Barnes EL, Long MD, et al. Combined endoscopic and oral fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with antibiotic-dependent pouchitis: low clinical efficacy due to low donor microbial engraftment. Inflamm Intest Dis. 2019;4(1):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selvig D, Piceno Y, Terdiman J, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation in pouchitis: clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and microbiota results from a pilot study. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65(4):1099–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandborn W, Tremaine W, Batts K, et al. Pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anas-tomosis: a pouchitis disease activity index. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69(5):409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen B, Lashner B. Diagnosis and treatment of pouchitis. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;4(5):355–361.
   Google Scholar
• Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Tilg H, et al. European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2017;66(4):569–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Kelly CR, et al. International consensus conference on stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2019;68(12):2111–2121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar R. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2460–2461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar R. SINTAX: a simple non-Bayesian taxonomy classifier for 16S and ITS sequences. bioRxiv. 2016. DOI:10.1101/074161
   Google Scholar
• Andersen K, Kirkegaard R, Karst S, et al. ampvis2: An R package to analyse and visualise 16S rRNA amplicon data. bioRxiv. 2018. DOI:10.1101/299537
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet F, Kindt R, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.17-2. 2011 [cited 2020 Mar 30]. Available from: https://kityna.ga/548893pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dowle M, Srinivasan A, Gorecki J, et al. data.table: Extension of “data.frame.” 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 30]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/data.table
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. ggplot2. 2016 [cited 2020 Mar 30]. Available from: https://ggplot2-book.org/
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H, Henry L. tidyr: Tidy Messy Data. 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 30]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tidyr/inde
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen T. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content. DET K DANSKE Vidensk Selsk Biol Skr. 1948;5(4):34.
   Google Scholar
• Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni J, Wu G, Albenberg L, et al. Gut microbiota and IBD: causation or correlation? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(10):573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogtmann E, Hua X, Zeller G, et al. Colorectal cancer and the human gut microbiome: reproducibility with whole genome shotgun sequencing. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smillie CS, Sauk J, Gevers D, et al. Strain tracking reveals the determinants of bacterial engraftment in the human gut following fecal microbiota transplantation. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(2):229–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeire S, Joossens M, Verbeke K, et al. Donor species richness determines faecal microbiota transplantation success in inflammatory bowel disease. ECCOJC. 2016;10(4):387–394.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen LJ, Cho JH, Gevers D, et al. Genetic factors and the intestinal microbiome guide development of microbe-based therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(8):2174–2189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan R, Rani A, Metwally A, et al. Analysis of the microbiome: advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;469(4):967–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan B, McMurdie P, Holmes S. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J. 2017;11(12):2639–2643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueholm MS, Andersen KS, Petriglieri F, et al. Comprehensive ecosystem-specific 16S rRNA gene databases with automated taxonomy assignment (AutoTax) provide species-level resolution in microbial ecology. bioRxiv. 2019. DOI:10.1101/672873
   Google Scholar
• Johnson JS, Spakowicz DJ, Hong BY, et al. Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar