372
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Clinical importance of main pancreatic duct variants and possible correlation with pancreatic diseases

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 517-527 | Received 16 Mar 2020, Accepted 20 Apr 2020, Published online: 12 May 2020

References

  • Bülow R, Simon P, Thiel R, et al. Anatomic variants of the pancreatic duct and their clinical relevance: an MR-guided study in the general population. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(12):3142–3149.
  • Türkvatan A, Erden A, Türkoğlu MA, et al. Congenital variants and anomalies of the pancreas and pancreatic duct: imaging by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography and multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14(6):905–913.
  • Adibelli ZH, Adatepe M, Imamoglu C, et al. Anatomic variations of the pancreatic duct and their relevance with the Cambridge classification system: MRCP findings of 1158 consecutive patients. Radiol Oncol. 2016;50(4):370–377.
  • Adda G, Hannoun L, Loygue J. Development of the human pancreas: variations and pathology. A tentative classification. Anat Clin. 1984;5(4):275–283.
  • Mortelé KJ, Rocha TC, Streeter JL, et al. Multimodality imaging of pancreatic and biliary congenital anomalies. Radiogr Rev PublRadiol Soc N Am Inc. 2006;26(3):715–731.
  • Sigfússon BF, Wehlin L, Lindström CG. Variants of pancreatic duct system of importance in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Observations on autopsy specimens. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1983;24(2):113–128.
  • Van Hoe L, Claikens B, et al. The pancreas: normal radiological anatomy and variants. In: Baert AL, editor. Radiology of the pancreas. Medical radiology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 1999. p. 19–68.
  • Kamisawa T. Clinical significance of the minor duodenal papilla and accessory pancreatic duct. J Gastroenterol. 2004;39(7):605–615.
  • Kamisawa T, Takuma K, Tabata T, et al. Clinical implications of accessory pancreatic duct. WJG. 2010;16(36):4499–4503.
  • Kozu T, Suda K, Toki F. Pancreatic development and anatomical variation. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;5(1):1–30.
  • Warshaw AL, Simeone JF, Schapiro RH, et al. Evaluation and treatment of the dominant dorsal duct syndrome (pancreas divisum redefined). Am J Surg. 1990;159(1):59–66.
  • Dawson W, Langman J. An anatomical-radiological study on the pancreatic duct pattern in man. Anat Rec. 1961;139(1):59–68.
  • Dimitriou I, Katsourakis A, Nikolaidou E, et al. The main anatomical variations of the pancreatic duct system: review of the literature and its importance in surgical practice. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10(5):370–375.
  • Aubé C, Hentati N, Tanguy J-Y, et al. Radio-anatomic study of the pancreatic duct by MR cholangiopancreatography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25(1):64–69.
  • Darnis E, Cronier P, Mercier P, et al. A radio-anatomical study in vivo on pancreatic ducts. Anat Clin. 1984;6(2):109–116.
  • Yu J, Turner MA, Fulcher AS, et al. Congenital anomalies and normal variants of the pancreaticobiliary tract and the pancreas in adults: part 2, pancreatic duct and pancreas. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(6):1544–1553.
  • Kasugai T, Kuno N, Kobayashi S, et al. Endoscopic pancreatocholangiography. I. The normal endoscopic pancreatocholangiogram. Gastroenterology. 1972;63(2):217–226.
  • Classen M, Hellwig H, Rösch W. Anatomy of the pancreatic duct A duodenoscopic-radiological study. Endoscopy. 1973;5(01):14–17.
  • Uomo G, Manes G, D'Anna L, et al. Fusion and duplication variants of pancreatic duct system. Clinical and pancreatographic evaluation. Int J Pancreatol. 1995;17(1):23–28.
  • Millbourn E. On the excretory ducts of the pancreas in man, with special reference to their relations to each other, to the common bile duct and to the duodenum. Acta Anat (Basel). 1950;9(1–2):1–34.
  • Baillie J, Paulson EK, Vitellas KM. Biliary imaging: a review. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(6):1686–1699.
  • Boraschi P, Donati F, Cervelli R, et al. Secretin-stimulated MR cholangiopancreatography: spectrum of findings in pancreatic diseases. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(6):819–829.
  • Sica GT, Braver J, Cooney MJ, et al. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology. 1999;210(3):605–610.
  • Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 1996;110(2):589–597.
  • Sai JK, Suyama M, Kubokawa Y, et al. Diagnosis of mild chronic pancreatitis (Cambridge classification): comparative study using secretin injection-magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. WJG. 2008;14(8):1218–1221.
  • Hellerhoff KJ, Helmberger H, Rösch T, et al. Dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin administration: image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(1):121–129.
  • Tirkes T, Sandrasegaran K, Sanyal R, et al. Secretin-enhanced MR cholangiopancreatography: spectrum of findings. Radiographics. 2013;33(7):1889–1906.
  • Matos C, Metens T, Devière J, et al. Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology. 1997;203(2):435–441.
  • Witt H, Apte MV, Keim V, et al. Chronic pancreatitis: challenges and advances in pathogenesis, genetics, diagnosis, and therapy. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(4):1557–1573.
  • Etemad B, Whitcomb DC. Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis, classification, and new genetic developments. Gastroenterology. 2001;120(3):682–707.
  • Schneider A, Löhr JM, Singer MV. The M-ANNHEIM classification of chronic pancreatitis: introduction of a unifying classification system based on a review of previous classifications of the disease. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42(2):101–119.
  • Löhr JM, Dominguez-Munoz E, Rosendahl J, et al. United European Gastroenterology evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of chronic pancreatitis (HaPanEU). Eur Gastroenterol J. 2017;5(2):153–199.
  • Manfredi R, Costamagna G, Brizi MG, et al. Severe chronic pancreatitis versus suspected pancreatic disease: dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology. 2000;214(3):849–855.
  • Domínguez-Muñoz JE, Hieronymus C, Sauerbruch T, et al. Fecal elastase test: evaluation of a new noninvasive pancreatic function test. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90(10):1834–1837.
  • Kleeff J, Whitcomb DC, Shimosegawa T, et al. Chronic pancreatitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17060
  • Löhr J-M. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreapedia: Exocrine Pancreas Knowledge Base. DOI:10.3998/panc.2016.14
  • MacCarty RL, Stephens DH, Brown AL, et al. Retrograde pancreatography in autopsy specimens. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1975;123(2):359–366.
  • Barkay O, Fogel EL, Watkins JL, et al. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(9):931–943.
  • Khawaja FI, Ahmad MM. Pancreas divisum and dominant dorsal duct syndrome: a brief review. JK Practitioner. 2014;19(1-2):1–10.
  • Boon N, Delhaye M, Le Moine O, et al. Severity of acute gallstone pancreatitis in patients with pancreas divisum. Endoscopy. 2003;35(5):407–410.
  • Wang DB, Yu J, Fulcher AS, et al. Pancreatitis in patients with pancreas divisum: imaging features at MRI and MRCP. WJG. 2013;19(30):4907–4916.
  • Smanio T. Proposed nomenclature and classification of the human pancreatic ducts and duodenal papillae. Study based on 200 post mortems. Int Surg. 1969;52(2):125–141.
  • Stimec B, Bulajić M, Korneti V, et al. Ductal morphometry of ventral pancreas in pancreas divisum. Comparison between clinical and anatomical results. Ital J Gastroenterol. 1996;28(2):76–80.
  • Levy MJ, Geenen JE. Idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterology. 2001;96(9):2540–2555.
  • Kamisawa T, Tu Y, Egawa N, et al. Clinical implications of incomplete pancreas divisum. JOP. 2006;7(6):625–630.
  • Kim MH, Lee SS, Kim CD, Lee SK, et al. Incomplete pancreas divisum: is it merely a normal anatomic variant without clinical implications?. Endoscopy. 2001;33(9):778–785.
  • Jacob L, Geenen JE, Catalano MF, et al. Clinical presentation and short-term outcome of endoscopic therapy of patients with symptomatic incomplete pancreas divisum. GastrointestEndosc. 1999;49(1):53–57.
  • Bang S, Suh JH, Park BK, et al. The relationship of anatomic variation of pancreatic ductal system and pancreaticobiliary diseases. Yonsei Med J. 2006;47(2):243–248.
  • Kamisawa T, Yuyang T, Egawa N, et al. Patency of the accessory pancreatic duct in relation to its course and shape: a dye-injection endoscopic retrograde pancreatography study. Am J Gastroenterology. 1998;93(11):2135–2140.
  • Prasanna LC, Rajagopal KV, Thomas HR, et al. Accessory pancreatic duct patterns and their clinical implications. JCDR. 2015;9(3):AC05–07.
  • Bhasin DK, Rana SS, Nanda M, et al. Ansa pancreatica type of ductal anatomy in a patient with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. JOP. 2006;7(3):315–320.
  • Hayashi TY, Gonoi W, Yoshikawa T, et al. Ansa pancreatica as a predisposing factor for recurrent acute pancreatitis. WJG. 2016; 22(40):8940–8948.
  • Jarrar MS, Khenissi A, Ghrissi R, et al. Ansa pancreatica: an anatomic variation and a rare cause of acute pancreatitis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(8):745–748.
  • Cotton PB. Congenital anomaly of pancreas divisum as cause of obstructive pain and pancreatitis. Gut. 1980;21(2):105–114.
  • Michailidis L, Aslam B, Grigorian A, et al. The efficacy of endoscopic therapy for pancreas divisum: a meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(5):550–558.
  • Bertin C, Pelletier A-L, Vullierme MP, et al. Pancreas divisum is not a cause of pancreatitis by itself but acts as a partner of genetic mutations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(2):311–317.
  • Schmitt F, Maignan A, Ploteau S, et al. New anatomical data on the drainage patterns of the uncinate process of the pancreas. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(8):777–781.
  • Berman LG, Prior JT, Abramow SM, et al. A study of the pancreatic duct system in man by the use of vinyl acetate casts of postmortem preparations. SurgGynecol Obstet. 1960;110:391–403.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.