167
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Implications of colonic and extra-colonic findings on CT colonography in FIT positive patients in the Dutch bowel cancer screening program

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1337-1342 | Received 10 May 2021, Accepted 03 Aug 2021, Published online: 10 Sep 2021

References

  • Netherlands comprehensive cancer organization (IKNL). 2020. Available from: https://www.iknl.nl/nkr-cijfers
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2018. [cited Oct 24]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home
  • Elferink MAG, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Vink GR, et al. Landelijk bevolkingsonderzoek naar colorectaal carcinoom. Resultaten van de eerste jaren sinds de invoering in 2014 [National population screening for colorectal carcinoma. Results of the first years since the introduction in 2014]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;162:D2283. Dutch
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). National monitoring and evaluation of the Dutch colorectal screenings program. 2019. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2019-03/monitor-evaluatie-darm-2014-2017.pdf
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). National monitoring of the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program. 2018. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2018-11/DarmMon2017-Engels5.pdf
  • Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):55–64.
  • Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicenter randomized trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9873):1194–1202.
  • Pendse DA, Taylor SA. Complications of CT colonography: a review. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(8):1159–1165.
  • Bellini D, Rengo M, De Cecco CN, et al. Perforation rate in CT colonography: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(7):1487–1496.
  • Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: prevalence, benefits, challenges, and opportunities. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(1):94–102.
  • Plumb AA, Halligan S, Nickerson C, et al. Use of CT colonography in the English bowel cancer screening programme. GUT. 2014;63(6):964–973.
  • Cash BD, Riddle MS, Bhattacharya I, et al. CT colonography of a medicare-aged population: outcomes observed in an analysis of more than 1400 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(1):W27–W34.
  • Pooler BD, Kim DH, Lam VP, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(6):1232–1237.
  • de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A, et al. Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(8):1747–1763.
  • Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection-systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011;259(2):393–405.
  • Halligan S, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy or barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer in older symptomatic patients: two multicentre randomised trials with economic evaluation (the SIGGAR trials). Health Technol Assess. 2015; 19(54):1–134.
  • Lynn W, Vadhwana B, Bell DJ, et al. Computed tomography colonography: a retrospective analysis of outcomes of 2 years experience in a district general hospital. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(5):541–545.
  • Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(23):2191–2200.
  • Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(14):1403–1412.
  • Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;315(23):2575–2576.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.