141
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Remote ischemic postconditioning has a detrimental effect and remote ischemic preconditioning seems to have no effect on small intestinal anastomotic strength

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 768-774 | Received 24 Nov 2021, Accepted 08 Feb 2022, Published online: 24 Feb 2022

References

  • Gessler B, Eriksson O, Angenete E. Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(4):549–556.
  • Chandramouli B, Srinivasan K, Jagdish S, et al. Morbidity and mortality of colostomy and its closure in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(4):596–599.
  • Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M, et al. Emerging trends in the etiology, prevention, and treatment of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(12):2035–2051.
  • Bosmans JWAM, Jongen ACHM, Bouvy ND, et al. Colorectal anastomotic healing: why the biological processes that lead to anastomotic leakage should be revealed prior to conducting intervention studies. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:180.
  • Shogan BD, Carlisle EM, Alverdy JC, et al. Do we really know why colorectal anastomoses leak? J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(9):1698–1707.
  • Akarsu M, Saygun O, Aydinuraz K, et al. The effects of simvastatin on ischemia reperfusion injury in an experimental Colon anastomosis model. Indian J Surg. 2017;79(5):390–395.
  • Ho YH, Ashour MA. Techniques for colorectal anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(13):1610–1621.
  • Kologlu M, Yorganci K, Renda N, et al. Effect of local and remote ischemia-reperfusion injury on healing of colonic anastomoses. Surgery. 2000;128(1):99–104.
  • Johnsen J, Pryds K, Salman R, et al. The remote ischemic preconditioning algorithm: effect of number of cycles, cycle duration and effector organ mass on efficacy of protection. Basic Res Cardiol. 2016;111(2):10.
  • Zhou D, Ding J, Ya J, et al. Remote ischemic conditioning: a promising therapeutic intervention for multi-organ protection. Aging (Albany, NY). 2018;10(8):1825–1855.
  • Marjanovic G, Jüttner E, Zur Hausen A, et al. Ischemic preconditioning improves stability of intestinal anastomoses in rats. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24(8):975–981.
  • Stokfisz K, Ledakowicz-Polak A, Zagorski M, et al. Ischaemic preconditioning – current knowledge and potential future applications after 30 years of experience. Adv Med Sci. 2017;62(2):307–316.
  • Hummitzsch L, Zitta K, Berndt R, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning attenuates intestinal mucosal damage: insight from a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):136.
  • Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: Healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery. 2006;26(3):131–136.
  • Chu W, Li S, Wang S, et al. Ischemic postconditioning provides protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in intestines of rats. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015; 8(6):6474–6481.
  • Agnarsson I, Boutry C, Wong S-C, et al. Supercontraction forces in spider dragline silk depend on hydration rate. Zoology (Jena). 2009;112(5):325–331.
  • Kim YI. Comparative study for preventive effects of intra-abdominal adhesion using cyclo-oxygenase-2 enzyme (COX-2) inhibitor, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and synthetic barrier. Yonsei Med J. 2013; 54(6):1491–1497.
  • Gosvig K, Jensen SS, Qvist N, et al. Remote computer-assisted analysis of ICG fluorescence signal for evaluation of small intestinal anastomotic perfusion: a blinded, randomized, experimental trial. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(5):2095–2102.
  • Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, NC3Rs Reporting Guidelines Working Group, et al. Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160(7):1577–1579.
  • Holzner PA, Kulemann B, Kuesters S, et al. Impact of remote ischemic preconditioning on wound healing in small bowel anastomoses. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(10):1308–1316.
  • Bøtker HE, Lassen TR, Jespersen NR. Clinical translation of myocardial conditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;314(6):H1225–H1252.
  • Gho BCG, Schoemaker RG, van den Doel MA, et al. Myocardial protection by brief ischemia in noncardiac tissue. Circulation. 1996;94(9):2193–2200.
  • Whittaker P, Przyklenk K. From ischemic conditioning to ‘hyperconditioning’: clinical phenomenon and basic science opportunity. Dose Response. 2014;12(4):650–663.
  • Gurdal SO, Celik A, Celik AS, et al. Effects of the ischemic preconditioning on anastomotic healing in laparoscopic Colon operations. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(4):388–393.
  • Colak T, Turkmenoglu O, Dag A, et al. The effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on healing of colonic anastomoses. J Surg Res. 2007;143(2):200–205.
  • Stoppe C, Meybohm P, Benstoem C, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning in cardiac anesthesia: a review focusing on translation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83(6):610–623.
  • Tapuria N, Kumar Y, Habib MM, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning: a novel protective method from ischemia reperfusion injury-a review. J Surg Res. 2008;150(2):304–330.
  • Duräes Lde C, Duräes EF, Lobato LF, et al. Correlation between bursting pressure and breaking strength in colonic anastomosis. Acta Cir Bras. 2013;28(6):447–452.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.