C-reactive protein and drain amylase: their utility in ruling out anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy

References

• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl M, Mariette C, Haustermans K, ESMO Guidelines Working Group, et al. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(Suppl 6):vi51–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P, Jr., et al. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(6):1919–1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamarajah SK, Lin A, Tharmaraja T, et al. Risk factors and outcomes associated with anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2020;33(3):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamura A, Yamashita K, Kozuki R, et al. Inflammatory response and recurrence after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019;404(6):761–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yibulayin W, Abulizi S, Lv H, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14(1):304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon SW, Kim JJ, Cho DG, et al. Early detection of complications: anastomotic leakage. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 5):S805–S811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkelmans GH, Kouwenhoven EA, Smeets BJ, et al. Diagnostic value of drain amylase for detecting intrathoracic leakage after esophagectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(30):9118–9125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry Y, Towe CW, Kwong J, et al. Serial drain amylase can accurately detect anastomotic leak after esophagectomy and may facilitate early discharge. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(6):2041–2046. discussion 6–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asti E, Bonitta G, Melloni M, et al. Utility of C-reactive protein as predictive biomarker of anastomotic leak after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018;403(2):235–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiolfi A, Asti E, Rausa E, et al. Use of C-reactive protein for the early prediction of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0209272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ip B, Ng KT, Packer S, et al. High serum lactate as an adjunct in the early prediction of anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy. Int J Surg. 2017;46:7–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: esophagectomy complications consensus group (ECCG). Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):286–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreatta E, Buogo A, Asti E, et al. Comparison of pleural drain amylase and serum C-reactive protein for early detection of intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomotic leaks. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(9):1315–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashok A, Niyogi D, Ranganathan P, et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection. Surg Today. 2020;50(4):323–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard KE, Achiam MP, Rolff HC, et al. Comparison of “nil by mouth” versus early oral intake in three different diet regimens following esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2017;41(6):1575–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. ClinicalTrials.gov. National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2000, “TreatmENT of AnastomotiC Leakage After Esophagectomy,” ed: Identifier NCT03829098. Retrieved February 7, 2021 from: TreatmENT of AnastomotiC Leakage After Esophagectomy - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov, 4 February 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Yu WS, Jung J, Shin H, et al. Amylase level in cervical drain fluid and anastomotic leakage after cervical oesophagogastrostomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56(2):301–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao C, Xu G, Wang C, et al. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;14(1):46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Helms GA, Mayfield WR. Evaluation of esophageal anastomotic integrity with serial pleural amylase levels. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(1):200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mooij CM, Maassen van den Brink M, Merry A, et al. Systematic review of the role of biomarkers in predicting anastomotic leakage following gastroesophageal cancer surgery. J Clin Med. 2019;8(11):2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulini L, Dubecz A, Solymosi N, et al. Prognostic value of chest-tube amylase versus C-reactive protein as screening tool for detection of early anastomotic leaks after ivor lewis esophagectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29(2):192–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Werf LR, Busweiler LAD, van Sandick JW, Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) group, et al. Reporting national outcomes after esophagectomy and gastrectomy according to the esophageal complications consensus group (ECCG). Ann Surg. 2020;271(6):1095–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JK, Kim JJ, Moon SW. C-reactive protein for the early prediction of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in both neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy case: a propensity score matching analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(10):3693–3702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar