91
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Perioperative strategies for patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy: a single-center retrospective review of 102 procedures

, , , , &
Pages 456-460 | Received 18 May 2023, Accepted 25 Nov 2023, Published online: 05 Dec 2023

References

  • Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(6):981–996. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.004.
  • Mayumi T, Okamoto K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo guidelines 2018: management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):96–100. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.519.
  • Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C, et al. Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. Jama. 2003;290(16):2168–2173. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2168.
  • Quillin RC, 3rd, Burns JM, Pineda JA, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the cirrhotic patient: predictors of outcome. Surgery. 2013;153(5):634–640. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.012.
  • Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(1):101–125.
  • Eikermann M, Siegel R, Broeders I, et al. Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the european association for endoscopic surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc. 2012;26(11):3003–3039. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2511-1.
  • Coccolini F, Catena F, Pisano M, et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2015;18:196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083.
  • Strasberg SM, Pucci MJ, Brunt LM, et al. Subtotal cholecystectomy-”fenestrating” vs “reconstituting” subtypes and the prevention of bile duct injury: definition of the optimal procedure in difficult operative conditions. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(1):89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.019.
  • Koo JGA, Chan YH, Shelat VG. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: comparison of reconstituting and fenestrating techniques. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(3):1014–1024. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08096-0.
  • van Dijk AH, Donkervoort SC, Lameris W, et al. Short- and Long-Term outcomes after a reconstituting and fenestrating subtotal cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(3):371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.05.016.
  • Loh AYH, Chean CS, Durkin D, et al. Short and long term outcomes of laparoscopic fenestrating or reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic total cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford). 2022;24(5):691–699. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.09.018.
  • Tay WM, Toh YJ, Shelat VG, et al. Subtotal cholecystectomy: early and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(10):4536–4542. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07242-7.
  • Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS, et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: european society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) clinical Guideline - Updated october 2017. Endoscopy. 2018;50(9):910–930. doi: 10.1055/a-0659-9864.
  • Yachimski P, Orr JK, Gamboa A. Endoscopic plastic stent therapy for bile leaks following total vs subtotal cholecystectomy. Endosc Int Open. 2020;8(12):E1895–e9. doi: 10.1055/a-1300-1319.
  • Canena J, Horta D, Coimbra J, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic management of primary and refractory postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in a multicentre review of 178 patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0334-y.
  • Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–111. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779.
  • Rickham PP. Human experimentation. CODE OF ethics OF THE world medical association. DECLARATION OF helsinki. Br Med J. 1964;2(5402):177. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5402.177.
  • Elshaer M, Gravante G, Thomas K, et al. Subtotal cholecystectomy for “difficult gallbladders”: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(2):159–168. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1219.
  • Nzenwa IC, Mesri M, Lunevicius R. Risks associated with subtotal cholecystectomy and the factors influencing them: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies published between 1985 and 2020. Surgery. 2021;170(4):1014–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.036.
  • Lunevicius R, Nzenwa IC, Mesri M. A nationwide analysis of gallbladder surgery in England between 2000 and 2019. Surgery. 2022;171(2):276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.025.
  • Sabour AF, Matsushima K, Love BE, et al. Nationwide trends in the use of subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surgery. 2020;167(3):569–574. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.11.004.
  • Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Khullar R, et al. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a review of 56 procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2000;10(1):31–34. doi: 10.1089/lap.2000.10.31.
  • Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Jani K, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: the role of subtotal cholecystectomy and its variants. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(2):145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.04.019.
  • LeCompte MT, Robbins KJ, Williams GA, et al. Less is more in the difficult gallbladder: recent evolution of subtotal cholecystectomy in a single HPB unit. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(7):3249–3257. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07759-2.
  • Jones M, Johnson M, Samourjian E, et al. ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a combined (one-step) procedure: a random comparison to the standard (two-step) procedure. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(6):1907–1912. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2647-z.
  • Cemachovic I, Letard JC, Begin GF, et al. Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy is a reasonable option for complete single-stage minimally invasive biliary stones treatment: short-term experience with 57 patients. Endoscopy. 2000;32(12):956–962. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9622.
  • Lella F, Bagnolo F, Rebuffat C, et al. Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called “rendezvous” technique, in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a valid method in cases with patient-related risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(3):419–423. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0356-6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.