What Is Normal Oesophageal Motility? An Ambulatory Study

REFERENCES

• Vantrappen G, Servaes J, Janssens J, Peters T. Twenty-four hour oesophageal pH and pressure recording in outpatients. In: Wienbeck L, editor. Motility of the digestive tract. New York: Raven; 1982. p. 293–7.
   Google Scholar
• Akkermans LM. Esophageal manometry: microtransducers. Dig Dis Sci 1991;36 Suppl:14S–16S.
   Google Scholar
• Anggiansah A, Taylor G, Bright NF, Wang J, Singh SD, Owen WA, et al. Comparisons of manual and automated analysis of oesophageal body contractility with on-line and compressed data. Gut 1994;35 Suppl 5:S13.
   Google Scholar
• Emde C, Armstrong D, Bumm RK, Kaufhould HJ, Riecken EO, Blum AL. Twenty-four hour continuous ambulatory measurement of oesophageal pH and pressure: a digital recording system and computer-aided manometry analysis. J Amb Motil 1990;3: 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Breedijk M, Smout AJP, Van Der Zouw C, Verwey H, Akkermans LM. Microcomputer-based system for 24-hour recording of esophageal motility and pH profile with automated analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 1989;27:41–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bumm R, Emde C, Armstrong D, Bauerfeind P, Blum AL. Ambulatory esophageal manometry: comparison of expert and computer aided analyses. J Gastrointest Motil 1990;2:216–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bremmer RM, Costantini M, Hoeft SF, Yasui A, Crookes PF, Shibberu H, et al. Manual verification of computer analysis of 24-hour esophageal motility. Biomed Instrum Technol 1993;27: 49–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soffer EE, Scalabrini P, Wingate DL. Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain: Value of ambulatory esophageal pH and motility monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 1984;34:1651–5.
   Google Scholar
• Vantrappen G, Janssens J, Ghilibert I. The irritable esophagus: a frequent cause of chest pain. Lancet 1987;1:1232–4.
   Google Scholar
• Peters L, Maas L, Petty D, Dalton C, Penner D, Wu C, et al. Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain. Evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring. Gastroenterology 1988;94:878–86.
   Google Scholar
• Richter JE, Castell DO. 24-hour ambulatory esophageal motility monitoring: how should motility data be analysed? Gut 1989; 30: 1040–7.
   Google Scholar
• Anggiansah A, Taylor G, Bright NF, Wang J, Owen WA, Rokkas T, et al. Primary peristalsis is the major acid clearance mechanism in reflux patients. Gut 1994;35:1536–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremner RM, Hoeft SF, Costantini M, Crookes PF, Bremmer CG, DeMeester TR. Pharyngeal swallowing: the major factor in clearance of esophageal reflux episodes. Ann Surg 1993;218: 364–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein JH, Eypasch EP, DeMeester TR, Smayrk TC, Attwood SEA. Circadian esophageal motor function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery 1990;108:769–78.
   Google Scholar
• Eypasch EP, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Johansson KE, Barlow AP, Schneider GT. A new technique to define and clarify esophageal motor disorders. Am J Surg 1990;159:144–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smout AJPM, Breedijk M, Van Der Zouw C, Akkermans LMA. Physiological gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motor activity studied with a new system for 24-hour recording and automated analysis. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:372–8.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong D, Emde C, Bumm R, Castiglione F, Cilluffo T, Blum AL. Twenty-four hour patterns of oesophageal motility in asymptomatic volunteers. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:1190–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse-Andersen S, Wallin L, Madsen T. Ambulatory 23 hour recording of intraoesophageal pressures in normal volunteers: a propagation analysis from one proximal and two distal recording sites. Gut 1991;32: 1270–4.
   Google Scholar
• Langevin S, DeNuna SF, Castell DO. Does diet affect values obtained during prolonged ambulatory pressure monitoring? Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:225–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ansemino M, Hinder RA. Ambulatory esophageal manometry. Prob Gen Surg 1992;9:62–74.
   Google Scholar
• Adamek RJ, Wegener M, Wienbeck M, Gielen B. Long-term esophageal manometry in healthy subjects: evaluation of normal values and influence of age. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:2069–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolotti M, Annese V, Coccia G, Pace F, Dimartini N, Passaretti S, et al. Twenty-four hour ambulatory oesophageal manometry in normal subjects (cooperative study). Neurogastroenterol Mot 1994;6:311–20.
   Google Scholar
• Diamant NE, Vanek AW. Responses of the human esophagus to paired swallows. Gastroenterology 1987;92:643–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gotley DC, Barham CP, Miller R, Arnold R, Alderson D. The sphinctometer: a new device for measurement of lower oesophageal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1991;78:933–5.
   Google Scholar
• Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991. p. 211.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel S. Nonparametric statistic for the behavioural sciences. New York: McGraw Hill; 1956. p. 213–4.
   Google Scholar
• Emde C, Armstrong D, Blum AL. Reproducibility of long-term ambulatory esophageal combined pH/manometry. Gastroenterology 1991;100:1630–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Beck IT, Paterson WG. Reproducibilty and physiological characteristics of 24-hour ambulatory esophageal manometry/pH-metry. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91: 492–7.
   Google Scholar
• DeMeester TR, Johnson LF, Joseph GJ, Toscano MS, Hall AW, Skinner DB. Patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease. Ann Surg 1976;184:459–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse-Andersen S, Ruth K, Kolberg J, Jakobsen E, Madsen T. Automatic detection of esophageal pressure events: is there an alternative to rule-based criteria? Dig Dis Sci 1995;40:1659–68.
   Google Scholar
• Castell JA, Richter JE, Castell DO. Comparison of effect of decreasing sampling rates on measurement of esophageal peristaltic amplitude and duration. Gastroenterology 1988;95: 859.
   Google Scholar
• Emde C, Cilluffo T, Castigalione F, Fiebig M, Bumm R, Hopert R, et al. Digital ambulatory long-term oesophageal manometry: low intra-individual and high inter-individual variability impedes the determination of generally applicable ‘normal values’. J Amb Motil 1989;1:59.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis JB, Castell DO. Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis. J Appl Physiol 1975;38:1161–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens J, Annese V, Vantrappen G. Bursts of non-deglutitive simultaneous contractions may be a normal oesophageal motility pattern. Gut 1993;34:1021–4.
   Google Scholar