Endosonography in Benign Anorectal Disease: an Overview

References

• Rifkin D. Endosonography of the prostate: clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 1137–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt U, Feifel G, Ecker KW. Rectal endosonography. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 1989; 3: 531–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cammarota T, Discalzo L, Corno F, Dal Bo R, Fiore L. First experiences with trans-rectal echotomography in perianal abscess pathology. Radiol Med (Torino) 1986; 72: 837–40.
   Google Scholar
• Law PJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointest Radiol 1989; 14: 349–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun WM, Peck RJ, Shorthouse AJ, Read NW. Haemorrhoids are associated not with hypertrophy of the internal anal sphincter, but with hypertension of the anal cushions. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 592–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law PJ, Talbot RW, Bartram CI, Northover J. Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal sepsis and fistula in ano. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 752–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. A comparison between electromyography and anal endosonography in mapping external anal sphincter defects. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 370–3.
   Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA. Anorectal endosonography in benign anorectal disorders. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993; Suppl 200: 70–3.
   Google Scholar
• Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Derksen EJ, Boutkan H, Meuwissen SG. Anal sphincter imaging in fecal incontinence using endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Deen KI, Williams JG, Hutchinson R, Keighley M, Kumar D. Fistulas in ano: endoanal ultrasonographic assessment assists decision making for surgery. Gut 1994; 35: 391–4.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Rasmussen OO, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Anal endosonographic findings in patients with obstructed defecation. Acta Radiol 1993; 34: 35–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eckardt VF, Jung B, Fischer B, Lierse W. Anal endosonography in healthy subjects and patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 235–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma R, Poen A, Cuesta M, Meuwissen S Referral for anorectal function evaluation: therapeutic implications and reassurance [Thesis]. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Farouk R, Bartolo D. The clinical contribution of integrated laboratory and ambulatory anorectal physiology assessment in faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 1993; 8: 60–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enck P, von Giesen HJ, Schafer A, et al. Comparison of anal sonography with conventional needle electromyography in the evaluation of anal sphincter defects. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 2539–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Christiansen J. Endosonography of the anal sphincter: findings in healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 1199–202.
   Google Scholar
• Hizawa K, Iida M, Suekane H, et al. Mucosal prolapse syndrome: diagnosis with endoscopic US. Radiology 1994; 191: 527–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Buchmann P. Anal sphincter defects in fecal incontinence: correlation between endosonography and surgery. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 217–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijers O, Tio T, Tytgat G. Ultrasonography and endosonography in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Endoscopy 1992; 24: 559–64.
   Google Scholar
• Tio TL, Mulder C, Wijers OB, Sars P, Tytgat G. Endosonography of peri-anal and peri-colorectal fistula and/or abscess in Crohn’s disease. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36: 331–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Stolfi VM, et al. Endoluminal ultrasound defines anatomy of the anal canal and pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 465–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet 1997; 349: 612–5.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Sorensen M, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Anal sphincter size measured by endosono-graphy in healthy volunteers. Effect of age, sex and parity. Acta Radiol 1992; 33: 453–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett SJ, Bartram CI. Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991; 6: 2–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Beynon J, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 508–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Nicholls JR, Bartram CI. Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol 1994; 49: 368–74.
   Google Scholar
• Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR, Smith AN. Anal endosonography in asymptomatic subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993; 28: 551–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdes B, Kohler HH, Zielke A, Kisker O, Barth PJ, Stinner B. The anatomical basis of anal endosonography—a study in postmortem specimens. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 986–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Normal values and reproducibilty of anal endosonographic measurements. Eur J Ultrasound 1997; 6: 103–10.
   Google Scholar
• Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR, Smith AN. Significance of the thickness of the anal sphincters with age and its relevance in faecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994; 29: 710–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF. Changes in the anal sphincter with age. An endosonographic study. Acta Radiol 1996; 37: 357–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer R, Heyer T, Gantke B, et al. Anal endosonography and manometry: comparison in patients with defecation problems. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 293–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantke B, Schafer A, Enck P, Lubke HJ. Sonographic, manometric, and myographic evaluation of the anal sphincters morphology and function. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 1037–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emblem R, Dhaenens G, Stien R, Morkric L, Aasen AO, Bergan A. The importance of anal endosonography in the evaluation of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 42–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosterhalfen B, Offner F, Topf N, Vogel P, Mittermayer C. Sclerosis of the internal anal sphincter—A process of aging. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 606–9.
   Google Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Internal hemorrhoids are associated with endosonographic thickening of the submucosa and hypertrophy of the external anal sphincter. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: A736.
   Google Scholar
• Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Phillips RKS. Haemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 946–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerremans R Morphological and physiological aspects of anal incontinence and defaecation [Thesis]. Brussels: Editions Arscia, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan E, Morgan C. Surgical anatomy ofthe anal canal with special reference to anorectal fistulae. Lancet 1934; ii: 1150–6, 1213–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lunniss PJ, Phillips R. Anatomy and function of the anal longitudinal muscle. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 882–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H. Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 1977; 18: 656–65.
   Google Scholar
• Snooks SJ, Swash M, Setchell M, Henry MM. Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 1984; ii: 546–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1905–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kamm MA. Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence. Lancet 1994; 344: 730–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Hudson CN. Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1993; 43: 263–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett SJ, Spence-Jones C, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Unsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Radiol 1991; 64: 225–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 312–4.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Anal endosonographic findings in the followup of primarily sutured sphincteric ruptures. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 104–6.
   Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M, et al. Anal endosonography: relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic tests. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 944–9.
   Google Scholar
• Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley M. The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study. Gut 1993; 34: 685–8.
   Google Scholar
• Farouk R, Bartolo DC. The use of endoluminal ultrasound in the assessment of patients with faecal incontinence. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1994; 39: 312–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Felt-Bersma RJ, van Baren R, Koorevaar M, Strijers RL, Cuesta MA. Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 249–53.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Prospective study of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1031–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speakman CT, Burnett SJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Sphincter injury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosono-graphy. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 1429–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Rasmussen OO, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Risk of sphincter damage and anal incontinence after anal dilatation for fissure-in-ano: an endosonographic study. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 677–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farouk R, Drew P, Duthie G, Lee P, Moson J. Disruption ofthe internal anal sphincter can occur after transanal stapling. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 1400.
   Google Scholar
• Silvis R, van Eekelen JW, Delemarre JB, Gooszen HG. Endosonography of the anal sphincter after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Relation with anal manometry and fecal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 383–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel AF, Kamm MA, Talbot IC. Progressive systemic sclerosis of the internal anal sphincter leading to passive faecal incontinence. Gut 1994; 35: 857–9.
   Google Scholar
• Eckardt VF, Kanzler G. How reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone? Int J Colorectal Dis 1993; 8: 95–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madoff RD, Williams JG, Caushaj PF. Fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1002–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallan R, Marzouk D, Waldron D, Williams N. Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincteric function. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 973–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 463–5.
   Google Scholar
• Keating JP, Stewart PJ, Eyers AA, Warner D, Bokey EL. Are special investigations of value in the management of patients with fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 896–901.
   Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma R, Gort G, Meuwissen S. Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: a problem of range. Hepatogastroenterology 1991; 38: 444–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Endosono-graphic evaluation of patients with anal incontinence: findings and influence on surgical management. AMJ Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160: 771–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger NA, Sweeney JL, Hoffmann DC, Young JF, Hunter A. Investigation of fecal incontinence with endoanal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 860–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romano G, Rotondano G, Esposito P, Pellecchia L, Novi A. External anal sphincter defects: correlation between preoperative anal endosonography and intraoperative findings. Br J Radiol 1996; 69: 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett SJ, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 448–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley M. Anal sphincter defects: correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgery. Ann Surg 1993; 218: 201–5.
   Google Scholar
• Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Schroeder T, Fazio VW. Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 689–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk PM, Blatchford GJ, Cali RL, Christensen MA, Thorson AG. Transanal ultrasound and manometry in the evaluation of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 468–72.
   Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M. Anal sphincter repair improves anorectal function and endosonographic image. A prospective clinical study. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 878–85.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Dammegaard L, Pedersen JF. Endosonographic assessment of the anal sphincter after surgical reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 434–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Third degree perineal rupture: long term clinical and functional results after primary repair. Br J Surg. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Sitzler PJ, Thomson JP. Overlap repair of damaged anal sphincter. A single surgeon’s series. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 1356–60.
   Google Scholar
• Engel AF, Kamm MA, Sultan AH, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1231–4.
   Google Scholar
• Engel AF, Lunniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS. Sphincteroplasty for incontinence after surgery for idiopathic fistula in ano. Int J Colorect Dis 1997; 12: 323–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ternent CA, Shashidharan M, Blatchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG, Sentovich SM. Transanal ultrasound and anorectal physiology findings affecting continence after sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 462–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leroi AM, Kamm MA, Weber J, Denis P, Hawley PR. Internal anal sphincter repair. Int J Colorect Dis 1997; 12: 243–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Vaginal endosonography of the anal sphincter complex is important in the assessment of faecal incontinence and perianal sepsis. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 359–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Loder PB, Bartram CI, Kamm MA, Hudson CN. Vaginal endosonography. New approach to image the undisturbed anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1296–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander AA, Liu JB, Merton DA, Nagle DA. Fecal incontinence—Transvaginal US evaluation of anatomic causes. Radiology 1996; 199: 529–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandridge DA, Thorp JM. Vaginal endosonography in the assessment of the anorectum. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 1007–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell DM, Behan M, Donnelly VS, O’Herlihy C, O’Connell PR. Endosonographic assessment of postpartum anal sphincter injury using a 120 degree sector scanner. Clin Radiol 1996; 51: 559–61.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CM, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BmJ 1994; 308: 887–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bek KM, Laurberg S. Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after a complete obstetric anal sphincter tear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 724–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Dekker GA, Deville W, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Third degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 563–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parks A, Gordon P, Hardcastle J. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 1976; 63: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Schratter SA, Lochs H, Vogelsang H, Schurawitzki H, Herold C, Schratter M. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of perianorectal complications in Crohn’s disease [see comments]. Endoscopy 1993; 25: 582–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuijpers HC, Schulpen T. Fistulography for fistula-in-ano: is it useful? Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28: 103–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 445–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong D, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD, Jagelman DG. Anal endosonography for recurrent anal fistulas: image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 1158–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Eijsbouts QAJ, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Hydrogen peroxide enhanced transanal ultrasound in the diagnosis of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Iroatulam A, Nogueras J, Chen H, et al. Accuracy of endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating anal fistulas. Gastroenterology 1997; 112 Suppl: A1450.
   Google Scholar
• Schratter SA, Lochs H, Handl ZL, Tscholakoff D, Schratter M. Endosonographic features of the lower pelvic region in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 1054–7.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon M. Fistulae and abscesses in symptomatic perianal Crohn’s disease. Int J Colorect Dis 1996; 11: 222–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussain S, Stoker J, Schouten W, Hop W, Lameris J. Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology 1996; 200: 475–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lunniss PJ, Barker PG, Sultan AH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 708–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farouk R, Monson J, Duthie G. Technical failure of lateral sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a study using endoanal ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 84–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kamm MA, Hoyle CH, Burleigh DE, et al. Hereditary internal anal sphincter myopathy causing proctalgia fugax and constipation. A newly identified condition. Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 805–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma R, Strijers R, Janssen J, Visser SL, Meuwissen S. The external anal sphincter: relationship between anal manometry and anal electromyography and its clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32: 112–6.
   Google Scholar
• Eckardt VF, Dodt O, Kanzler G, Bernhard G. Anorectal function and morphology in patients with sporadic proctalgia fugax. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 755–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerremans R. The composition of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989; 4: 118–22.
   Google Scholar
• Teramoto T, Parks AG, Swash M. Hypertrophy of the external anal sphincter in haemorrhoids: a histometric study. Gut 1981; 22: 45–8.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron DJ, Kumar D, Hallan RI, Williams NS. Prolonged ambulant assessment of anorectal function in patients with prolapsing hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32: 968–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA, Michielsen PP, Van Maercke YM. Value of transrectal ultrasonography in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 1991; 101: 1171–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon MJ, McLeod RS, Cohen EK, Cohen Z. Anal wall thickness under normal and inflammatory conditions of the anorectum as determined by endoluminal ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 574–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar