REFERENCES
- Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ Campbell's urology. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1998; Vol. 1:2121.
- Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin: incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys. Arch Dis Child 1968; 43: 200–4.
- Rickwood AMK, Walker J. Is phimosis overdiagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence? Ann R Coll Surg 1989; 71: 275–7.
- Dewan PA, Tieu HC, Chieng BS. Phimosis: is circumcision necessary? J Paediatr Child Health 1996; 32: 285–9.
- Diaz A, Kantor HI. Dorsal slit. Obstet Gynecology 1971; 37: 619–22.
- Stenram A, Malmfors G, Okmian L. Circumcision for phimosis-indications and results. Acta Paed Scand 1986; 75: 321–3.
- Niku SD, Stock JA, Kaplan GW. Neonatal circumcision. Urol Clinics N Am 1995; 22: 57–65.
- Kikiros CS, Beasley SW, Woodward AA. The response of phimosis to local steroid application. Paediatric Surg Int 1993; 8: 329–32.
- Jorgensen ET, Svensson AA. The treatment of phimosis in boys with a potent topical steroid (Clobetasol propionate 0.05%) cream. Acta Derm Venereol 1993; 73: 55–6.
- Wright JE. The treatment of childhood phimosis with topical steroid. Aust N Z Surg 1994; 64: 327–8.
- Lindhagen T. Topical clobestasol propionate compared with placebo in the treatment of retractable foreskin. Eur Surg 1996; 162: 969–72.
- Golubovic Z, Milanovic D, Vukadinovic V, Rakic I, Perovic S. The conservative treatment of phimosis in boys. Br J Urol 1996; 78: 786–8.
- Atilla MK, Dundaroz R, Odabas 0, Ozturk H, Akin R, Gokcay E. A nonsurgical approach to the treatment of phimosis; local nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ointment application. J Urol 1997; 158: 196–7.