Clinical Management of Premalignant Lesions of the Prostate

REFERENCES

• Bostwick DG. Premalignant lesions of the prostate. Semin Diagn Pathol 1988; 5: 240–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostwick DG, Srigley JR. Premalignant lesions of the prostate. In: Pathology of the prostate. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990: 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bostwick DG, Srigley JR, Grignon D, Maksem J, Humphrey P, van der Kwast T, et al. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate: Morphologic criteria for its distinction from well differentiated carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1993; 24: 819–32.
   Google Scholar
• Iczkowski K, MacLennan G, Bostwick D. Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsies: Clinical significance in 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 21: 1489–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kambham N, Taylor J, Troxel A, Rubin M. Atypical small acinar proliferation in prostate needle biopsies. J Urol Pathol 1999; 10: 177–87.
   Google Scholar
• Stone E. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: will it help doctors pinpoint early prostate cancer? J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 1023–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Häggman MJ, Macoska JA, Wojno KJ, Oesterling JE. The relationship between prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: Critical Issues. J Urol 1997; 158: 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein JI, Grignon DJ, Humphrey PA, McNeal JE, Sesterhenn IA, Troncoso P. et al. Interobserver reprodu-cibility in the diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 1995; 19: 873–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allam CK, Bostwick DG, Hayes JA, Upton MP, Wade GG, Domanowski GF, et al. Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol 1996; 9: 742–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drago JR, Mostofi FK, Lee F. Introductory remarks and workshop summary. Proceedings of a workshop of the National Prostate Cancer Detection Project, March 13, 1989, Bethesda, Maryland. Urology 1989: 34\(Suppl 2–3).
   Google Scholar
• Brawn PN, Speights VO, Contin JU, Bayardo RJ, Kuhl DL. Atypical hyperplasia in prostates of 20 to 40 year old men. J Clin Pathol 1989; 42: 383–6.
   Google Scholar
• Helpap B. The biological significance of atypical hyperplasia of the prostate. Virchows Arch 1980; 387: 307–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein JI, Cho KR, Quinn BD. Relationship of severe dysplasia to stage A (incidental) adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 1990; 65: 2321–7.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn BD, Cho KR, Epstein JI. Relationship of severe dysplasia to stage B adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 1990; 65: 2328–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bostwick DG, Cooner WH, Denis L, Jones GW, Scardino PT, Murphy GP. The association of benign prostatic hyperplasia and cancer of the prostate. Cancer 1992; 70: 291–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostwick DG. Prospective origins of prostate carcino-ma. Cancer 1996; 78: 330–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruska KM, Sauvageot J, Epstein JI. Histology and cellular kinetics of prostatic atrophy. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22: 1073–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMarzo AM, Marchi VL, Epstein JI, Nelson WG. Proliferative inflammatory atrophy of the prostate: Implications for prostatic carcinogenesis. Am J Pathol 1999; 155: 1985–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettlin C, Lee F, Drago J, et al. The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men. Cancer 1991; 67: 2949–59.
   Google Scholar
• Richie JP, Kavoussi LR, Ho GT, et al. Prostate cancer screening: role of digitial rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen. Ann Surg Oncol 1994; 1: 117–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feneley MR, Green JSA, Young MPA, Bose P, Kirby RS, Peeling WB, et al. Prevalence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in biopsies from hospital practice and pilot screening: clinical implications. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 1997; 1: 79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoedemaker RF, Kranse R, Rietbergen JBW, Kruger AEB, Schröder FH, van der Kwast TH. Evaluation of prostate needle biopsies in a population-based screening study. Cancer 1999; 85: 145–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lee F, Torp-Pedersen ST, Carroll JT, Siders DB, Christensen-Day C, Mitchell AE. Use of transrectal ultrasound and prostate-specific antigen in diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Urology 1989; Suppl 34: 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bostwick DG, Qian J, Frankel K. The incidence of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsies. J Urol 1995; 154: 1791–4.
   Google Scholar
• Langer JE, Rovner ES, Coleman BG, et al. Strategy for repeat biopsy of patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia detected by prostate needle biopsy. J Urol 1996; 155: 228–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills ML, Hamper UM, Partin AW, et al. Incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in sextant needle biopsy specimens. Urology 1997; 49: 367–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjorten FJ, Berner A, Harvei S, Robsahm TE, Tretli S. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in surgical resections. Relationship to coexistent adenocarcinoma and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate. Cancer 1997; 79: 1172–9.
   Google Scholar
• Perachino M, Diciolo L, Barbetti V. Ardiono S, Vitali A, Introini C, et al. Results of rebiopsy for suspected prostate cancer in symptomatic men with elevated PSA levels. Eur Urol 1997; 32: 155–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kovi J, Mostofi FK, Heshmat MY, Enterline JP. Large acinar atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 1988; 61: 555–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeal JE, Bostwick DG. Intraductal dysplasia: A premalignant lesion of the prostate. Hum Pathol 1986; 17: 64–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakr WA, Haas GP, Cassin BF, Pontes JE, Crissman JD. The frequency of carcinoma and intraepthelial neoplasia of the prostate in young malepatients. J Urol 1993; 150: 379–85.
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre M, Häggman M, Brändstedt S, Busch C. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and invasive carcinoma in total prostatectomy specimens: Distribu-tion, volumes and DNA ploidy. Br J Urol 1993; 72: 207–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Troncoso P. Babaian RJ, Ro JY, Grignon DJ, Eschen-bach AC, Ayala AG. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma in cystoprosta-tectomy specimens. Urology 1989; Suppl 34: 52–6.
   Google Scholar
• Oyasu R, Bahnson RR, Nowels K, Garnett JE. Cytological atypia in the prostate gland: Frequency, distribution and possible relevance to carcinoma. Urology 1986; 136: 959–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian J, Bostwick DG. The extent and zonal location of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical adeno-matous hyperplasia: relationship with carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens. Pathol Res Pract 1995; 191: 860–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter JR, Brawer MK. Prostatic intraepithelial neopla-sia and prostate specific antigen. World J Urol 1993; 11: 196–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakr WA, Grignon DJ, Crissman JD, Heilbrun LK, Cassin BF, Pontes JE, et al. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic adeno-carcinoma between the ages of 20-69: An autopsy study of 249 cases. In Vivo 1994; 8: 439–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bastacky SI, Wojno KJ, Walsh PC, Carmichael MJ, Epstein JI. Pathological features of hereditary prostate cancer. J Urol 1995; 153: 987–92.
   Google Scholar
• Sakr WA, Grignon DJ, Haas GP. Pathology of premalignant lesions and carcinoma of the prostate in African-American men. Semin Urol Oncol 1998; 16: 214–20.
   Google Scholar
• Billis A. Age and race distribution of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: An autopsy study in Brazil (South America). J Urol Pathol 1996; 5: 175–81.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg SS Diagnostic surgical pathology, Vol 2. New York: Raven Press, 1994: 1824–8.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein JI Prostate biopsy interpretation, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven 1995: 37–38, 59–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bostwick DG. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. The most likely precursor of prostate cancer. Cancer 1995; 75: 1823–36.
   Google Scholar
• Brawer M. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate specific antigen. Urology 1989; 34(Suppl 6): 62–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brawer MK, Rennels MA, Nagle RB, Schifman R, Gaines JA. Serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate pathology in men having simple prostatectomy. Am J Clin Pathol 1989; 92: 760–4.
   Google Scholar
• Keetch DV, Humphrey P, Stahl D, Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Morphometric analysis and clinical follow-up of isolated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1995; 154: 347–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ronnett BM, Carmichael MJ, Carter HB, Epstein Does high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia result in elevated serum prostate specific antigen levels? J Urol 1993; 150: 386–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raviv G, Zlotta AR, Janssen Th, Descamps F, Vanegas JP, Verhest A, et al. Do prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density enhance the detection of prostate carcinoma after initial diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia without concurrent carcinoma? Cancer 1996; 77: 2103–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander EE, Qian J, Wollan PC, Myers RP, Bostwick DG. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia does not appear to raise serum prostate specific antigen concentration. Urology 1996; 47: 693–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos GR, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Haberer B, Catalona WJ. The effect of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on serum total and percentage of free prostate-specific antigen levels. J Urol 1999; 161: 366A.
   Google Scholar
• Brawer MK, Rennels MA, Nagle RB, Soiderer MH, Lee F. Significance of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate needle biopsy. Urology 1991; 38: 103–7.
   Google Scholar
• Brawer MK, Rennels MA, Nagle RB, Soiderer MH, Lee F. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: A lesion that may be confused with cancer on prostatic ultrasound. J Urol 1989; 142: 1510–2.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein MH, Epstein JI. Significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy. Hum Pathol 1993; 24: 624–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson D, Bostwick DG, Qian J, Woolan P. Oesterling JE, Rudders RA, et al. Prostatic intraepithe-lial neoplasia is a risk factor for prostatic adenocarci- noma: Predictive accuracy in needle biopsies. J Urol 1995; 154: 1295–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norlen BJ, Busch C. The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 1997; 50: 562–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlotta AR, Schulman CC. Clinical evolution of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur Urol 1999; 35: 498–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggman M, Nordin B, Mattson S, Busch C. Morpho-metric studies of intra-prostatic volume relationships in localized prostatic cancer. Br J Urol 1997; 80: 612–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kastendieck H. Correlations between atypical primary hyperplasia and carcinoma of the prostate. A histo-pathological study of 180 total prostatectomies. Pathol Res Pract 1980; 169: 366–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggman M, Nybacka O, Nordin B, Busch C. Standardized in vitro mapping with multiple core biopsies of total prostatectomy specimens: Localization and prediction of tumour volume and grade. Br J Urol 1994; 74: 617–25.
   Google Scholar
• Häggman M, de la Torre M, Norberg M, Busch C. Preoperative histological and cytological diagnosis and DNA ploidy assessment of localized prostatic cancer. APMIS 1994; 102: 841–8.
   Google Scholar