Hydrophilic versus Non-coated Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization

References

• Mattelaer JJ. Catheters and sounds: the history of bladder catheterisation. In: Johan J, editor. Mattelaer: de Historia Urologia Europaeae 3. Historical Committee, European Association of Urology; 1996: 201–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lapides J, Diokno AC, Sherman JS, Lowe BS. Clean intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol 1972; 107: 458–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn W, Rist M, Zaech GS. Intermittent urethral self-catheterization: long term results (bacteriological evolu-tion, continence, acceptance, complications). Paraplegia 1991; 29: 222–32.
   Google Scholar
• Giannantoni A, Scivoletto G, Di Stasi SM, Silecchia A, Finazzi-Agro E, Micah I, Castellano V. Clean inter-mittent catheterization and prevention of renal disease in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 1998; 36: 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kass EJ, Koff SA, Diokno AC, Lapides J. The significance of bacilluria in children on long-term intermittent catheterization. J Urol 1981; 126: 223–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapides J, Diokno AC, Gould FR, Lowe BS. Further observations on self catheterization. J Urol 1976; 116: 169–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkash I, Giroux J. Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: A follow up. J Urol 1993; 149: 1068–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrouin-Verbe B, Labat JJ, Rickard J, Mauduyt de la Greve I, Buzelin JM, Mathe JF. Clean intermittent catheterisation from the acute period in spinal cord injury patients. Long term evaluation of urethral and genital tolerance. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 619–24.
   Google Scholar
• Webb RJ, Lawson AL, Neal DE. Clean intermittent self-catheterisation in 172 adults. Br J Urol 1990; 65: 20–3.
   Google Scholar
• Wyndaele J-J, Maes D. Clean intermittent self-catheter-ization: a 12 year followup. J Urol 1990; 143: 906–8.
   Google Scholar
• Macgregor RJ, Diokno AC. Self-catheterization for decompensated bladder: a review of 100 cases. J Urol 1979; 122: 602–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller L, Jonsson 0, Norlen L, Sullivan L. Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: long-term followup of a hydrophilic low friction tech-nique. J Urol 1995; 153: 345–8.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard FM, Glass J. Management of the neuropathic bladder by clean intermittent catheterization: 5 year out-comes. Paraplegia 1987; 25: 106–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellstrom A, Tammela T, Lukkarinen 0, Kontturi K. Efficacy and safety of clean intermittent catheterization in adults. Eur Urol 1991; 20: 117–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke A, Digranes A. Bacteriuria in patients treated with clean intermittent catheterization. Scand J Infect Dis 1991; 23: 577–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakke A, Digranes A, HOisxter Pik. Physical predictors of infection in patients treated with clean intermittent catheterization: a prospective study. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager TA, Anderson S, Trude11 J, Hendley JO. Nitrofurantoin prophylaxis for bacteriuria and urinarytract infection in children with neurogenic bladder on intermittent catheterization. J Pediatr 1998; 132: 704–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke A, Malt UF. Psychological predictors of symp-toms of urinary tract infection and bacteriuria in patients treated with clean intermittent catheterization: a pro-spective 7-year study. Eur Urol 1998; 34: 30–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearman JW, Bailey M, Riley LP. Bladder instillation of Trisdine compared with catheter introducer for reduction of bacteriuria during intermittent catheterisation of patients with acute spinal cord trauma. Br J Urol 1991; 67: 483–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett CJ, Young MN, Razi SS, Adkins R, Diaz F, McCrary A. The effect of urethral introducer tip catheter on the incidence of urinary tract infection outcomes in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 1997; 158: 519–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakke A, Vollset SE, HOisxter PA, Irgens LM. Physical complications in patients treated with clean intermittent catheterization. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1993; 27: 55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diokno AC, Mitchell BA, Nash AJ, Kimbrough JA. Patient satisfaction and the LoFric catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. J Urol 1995; 153: 349–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullerland AS, Kogabn BE, Baskin LS, Mevorach AR. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using LoFric catheter. J Urol 1996; 156: 2041–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachler J, Frimodt-Moller C. A comparison of prelu-bricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization. Br J Urol 1999; 83: 767–9.
   Google Scholar
• Waller L, Telander M, Sullivan L. The importance of osmolality in hydrophilic urethral catheters: a crossover study. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 229–33.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidyanathan S, Soni BM, Dundas S, Krishnan KR. Urethral cytology in spinal cord injury patients perform-ing intermittent catheterization. Paraplegia 1994; 32: 493–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsten J, Bowald S, Sullivan L, Nilsson A. Effect of catheterization and surface osmolarity on urethral epithelium-an experimental study on dogs. Proc Int Med Soc Paraplegia 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke A. Physical and psychological complications in patients treated with clean intermittent catheterization. Thesis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1993; Suppl 150: 1–69.
   Google Scholar