References
- Small DR, Lanigan DJ, Khan AB, Conn IG. Comparison of patients' assessment of urinary flow strength with uroflowmetry. Eur Urol 1997; 31: 148–52.
- Matzkin H, van der Zwaag R, Chen Y, Patterson LA, Braf Z, Soloway MS. How reliable is a single measure-ment of urinary flow in the diagnosis of obstruction in benign prostatic hyperplasia? Br J Urol 1993; 72: 181–6.
- Reynard JM, Peters TJ, Lim C, Abrams P. The value of multiple free-flow studies in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Br J Urol 1996; 77: 813–8.
- Johanson B. Reconstruction of the male urethra in strictures. Acta Chir Scand 1953; Suppl 176: 35.
- Boman J, Euren I, Norlen H. Simple flow measurement method (micturition time). Läkartidningen 1977; 74: 1718 (in Swedish with English abstract).
- Zdanowski A, Hansen MV. Pre treatment decision making in prostatism-a stochastic analysis based on the most used diagnostic tests. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1995; 29: 173–81.
- Siroky MB, Olsson CA, Krane RJ. The flow rate nomogram. II. Clinical correlation. J Urol 1980; 123: 208–10.
- Jorgensen JB, Jensen KM-E, Bille-Brahe NE, Mogensen P. Uroflowmetry in asymptomatic elderly males. Br J Urol 1986; 58: 390–5.
- Haylen BT, Ashby D, Sutherst JR, Frazer MI, West CR. Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal male and female populations-the Liverpool nomograms. Br J Urol 1989; 64: 30–8.
- Girman CJ, Panser LA, Chute CG, Oesterling JE, Barrett DM, Chen CC, et al. Natural history of prostatism: urinary flow rates in a community-based study. J Urol 1993; 150: 887–92.
- Drach GW, Layton TN, Binard WJ. Male peak urinary flow rate: relationship to volume voided and age. J Urol 1979; 122: 210–4.
- Von Garrelts B. Micturition in the normal male. Acta Chir Scand 1957; 114: 197–210.
- Jorgensen JB, Jacobsen HL, Bagi P. Hvames H, Colstrup H. Home uroflowmetry by means of the Da CapoC* home uroflowmeter. Eur Urol 1998; 33: 64–8.
- Drach GW, Steinbronn DV. Clinical evaluation of patients with prostatic obstruction: correlation of flow rates with voided, residual or total bladder volume. J Urol 1986; 135: 737–40.
- Sonke GS, Kiemeney LALM, Verbreek ALM, Kortmann BBM, Debruyne FMJ, de la Rosette JJMCH. Low repro-ducibility of maximum urinary flow determined by portable flowmetry. Neurourol Urodyn 1999; 18: 183–91.
- Sonke GS, Robertson C, Verbeek ALM, Witjes WPJ, de la Rosette BMCH, Kiemeney LA. A method for esti-mating within-patient variability in maximal urinary flow rate adjusted for voided volume. Urology 2002; 59: 368–72.
- Golomb J, Lindner A, Siegel Y, Korczak D. Variability and circadian changes in home uroflowmetry in patients Scand J Urol Nephrol 38 with benign prostatic hyperplasia compared to normal controls. J Urol 1992; 147: 1044–7.
- Rollema HJ Uroflowmetry in males [PhD thesis]. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, 1981: 3–5.
- Hansen MV, Zdanowski A. The use of a simple home flow test as a quality indicator for male patients treated for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction. Eur Urol 1997; 32: 34–8.
- Bloom DA, Foster WD, McLeod DG, Mittemeyer BT, Stutzman RE. Cost-effective uroflowmetry in men. J Urol 1985; 133: 421–4.