Functional Evaluation of the Remaining Kidney in Patients after Unilateral Nephrectomy

REFERENCES

• Tarantino A. Why should we implement living donation in renal transplantation? Clin Nephrol 2000; 53: 55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinkenecht C, Terzi F, Burton M, Laouari D, Maniar S. Experimental models of nephron reduction: some answers, many questions. Kidney Int 1995; 47 (Suppl 49): S51–4.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn AG, Ogden DA, Holmes JH. Renal function in twenty nine healthy adults before and after nephrectomy. JAMA 1966; 196: H110–2.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden DA. Donor and recipient function 2 to 4 years after renal homotransplantation. Ann Intern Med 1967; 67: 998–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou YH, Hsu CP. Age factor in compensatory hyperthophy of the kidney evaluated by 99mTc-DTPA renography. Urol Int 1991; 46: 126–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakuta T, Suzuki Y, Hida M, Wakabayashi M, Fujisaki T, Kitamura M, Hiraga S. Functional evaluation of the remaining kidney in kidney donors by radionuclide dynamic imaging using a graphic method with factor analysis. Nucl Med Commun 1997; 18: 937–42.
   Google Scholar
• Toronyi E, Alfoldy F, Jaray J, Remport A, Hidvegi M, Dabasi G, Telkes G, Offenbacher E, Perrier F. Evaluation of the state of health of living related kidney transplanta-tion donors. Transplant Int 1998; 11 (Suppl): 1S57–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wesson LG. Compensatory growth and other growth responses of the kidney. Nephron 1989; 51: 149–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narkun-Burgess DM, Nolan Ch, Norman J, Page WF, Miller PL, Meyer TW. Forty-five year follow-up after uninephrectomy. Kidney Int 1993; 43: 1110–5.
   Google Scholar
• Onishi A, Suzuki H, Nakamoto H, Katsumata H, Hayashi K, Ryuzaki M, Kumagai K, Furukawa T, Ichihara A, Saruta T, Higashi F, Marumo K. Status of patients who underwent uninephrectomy in adulthood more than 20 years ago. Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 26: 889–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke DR, Halstenson ChE, Opsahl JA, Matzke GR. Validity of creatinine clerance estimates in the assess-ment of renal function. Ther Drug Monit 1990; 48: 503–8.
   Google Scholar
• Argiles A, Mourad G, Basset N, Axelrud-Cavadore C, Haiech J, Mion C, Cavadore JC, Demaille JG. Acute adaptive changes to unilateral nephrectomy in humans. Kidney Int 1987; 32,714–20.
   Google Scholar
• Long CL, Jeevanandam M, Kinney TM. Metabolism and recycling of urea in man. Am J Clin Nutr 1978; 31: 1367–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odeh YK, Wang Z, Ruo TI, Wang T, Fredriksen MC, Pospisil PA, Atkinson AJ. Simultaneous analysis of inulin and 15N2-urea kinetics in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 53: 419–25.
   Google Scholar
• Coppo R, Amore A, Roccatello D, Martina G, Rollino C, Basolo B, Piccoli G. Microalbuminuria in single kidney patients: relationship with protein intake. Clin Nephrol 1988; 29: 219–28.
   Google Scholar
• Papagalanis N, Gennadiou M, Karabatsos A, Kosto-gianni G, Phenekos C, Elisaf M, Kourti A, Zacharof A, Siamopoulos K, Mountokalakis T. Effect of an acute oral protein load on microalbuminuria in uninephrectomized patients in relation to the time since nephrectomy. Nephron 1994; 68: 169–79.
   Google Scholar
• Kairemo KJ, Taari K, Salo JO, Kivisaari A, Rannikko S. Renal function remains after unilateral total and contralateral partial nephrectomy: an experimental study in pigs using 99mTc-DTPA. Urol Res 1996; 24: 161–6.
   Google Scholar
• Toronoyi E, Alfoldy F, Jaray J, Remport A, Hidvegi M, Dabasi G, Telkes G, Offenbacher E, Pemer F. Evaluation of the state of health of living related kidney transplanta-tion donors. Transplant Int 1998; 11 Suppl: 1S57–9.
   Google Scholar
• Stoffel M, Jamar F, van Nerom C, Verbruggen A, Mourad M, Leners N, Squifflet J-P, Beckers Ch. Evaluation of technetium-99m-L,L-EC in renal trans-plant recipients: a comparative study with technetium-99-MAG3 and iodine-125-0IH. J Nucl Med 1994; 135: 1951–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chou YH, Hsu CP. Age factor in compensatory hypertrophy of the kidney evaluated by 99mTc-DTPA renography. Urol Int 1991; 46: 126–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splendiani G, Parolini C, Fortunato L, Stumiolo A, Costanzi S. Resistive index in chronic nephropaties: predictive value of renal outcome. Clin Nephrol 2002; 57: 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kawauchi A, Yamao Y, Ukimura O, Kamoi K, Soh J, Miki T. Evaluation of reflux kidney using resistive index. J Urol 2001; 165: 2010–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Paolo FQ, Rivolta R, Elli A, Castagnone R. Relevance of resistive index ultrasonographic measurement in renal transplantation. Nephron 1996; 73: 195–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trovato GM, Catalano D, Sciacchitano G, Zuccala G, Iannetti E. Resistive index of renal artery and blood pressure in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 2002; 41: 223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Talseth T, Fauchald P, Skrede S, Djoseland O, Berg KJ, Stenstrom J, Heilo A, Brodwall E, Flatmark A. Long-term blood pressure and renal function in kidney donors. Kidney Int 1986; 29: 1072–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Kim WH, Choi BI, Kim CW. Duplex Doppler US in patients with medical renal disease: resistive index vs serum creatinine level. Clin Radiol 1992; 190: 343–6.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen LJ, Petersen JR, Ladefoged SD, Mehlsen J, Jensen HA. The pulsatility index and the resistive index in renal arteries in patients with hypertension and chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10: 2060–4.
   Google Scholar