29
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Radiographic anatomical factors do not predict clearance of lower caliceal calculus by shock-wave lithotripsy

, , , , &
Pages 226-229 | Received 23 Jul 2004, Accepted 24 Nov 2004, Published online: 09 Jul 2009

References

  • Graff J, Diederichs W, Schulze H. Long term follow up in 1003 ESWL patients. J Urol 1988;140: 479–83.
  • Lingeman JE. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Devel-opment, instrumentation and status. Urol Clin North Am 1997;24:185–211.
  • Chen RN, Streem SB. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi: long-term radiographic and clinical outcome. J Urol 1996;156:1572–5.
  • Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Elashry OM, Smith DS, McDougall EM, et al. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 1998;159:676–82.
  • Tuckey J, Devasia A, Murthy L, Ramsden P, Thomas D. Is there a simpler method for predicting lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy than measuring infundibulopelvic angle? J Endourol 2000;14:475–8.
  • Drach GW, Dretler S, Fair W, Finlayson B, Gillenwater J, Griffith D, et al. Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1986;135:1127 —33.
  • Politis G, Griffith DP. ESWL: stone free efficacy based on stone size and location. World J Urol 1987;5:255.
  • Obek C, Onal B, Kantay K, Kalkan M, Yalcin V, Oner A, et al. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated and upper caliceal calculi. J Urol 2001;166:2081–4.
  • Sampaio FJ, D'Anunciacao AL, Silva EC. Comparative follow-up of patients with acute and obtuse infundibulum-pelvic angle submitted to extracorporeal shockwave litho-tripsy for lower caliceal stones: preliminary report and proposed study design. J Endourol 1997;11:157–61.
  • Bagley DH, Rittenberg MH. Intrarenal dimensions: guide-lines for flexible ureteropyeloscopes. Surg Endosc 1987;1:119.
  • Sorensen CM, Chandhoke PS. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones? J Urol 2002;168:2377–82.
  • Sumino Y, Mimata H, Tasaki Y, Ohno H, Hoshino T, Nomura T, et al. Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 2002;168:1344–7.
  • Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B, Nyhus AW, Wood JR. Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 1994;151:663–7.
  • Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, Denstedt JD, Grasso M, Gutierrez-Aceves J, et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis—initial results. J Urol 2001;160:2072–80.
  • Madbouly K, Sheir KZ, Elsobky E. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave litho-tripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol 2001;165:1415–8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.