References
- Bentas W, Wolfram M, Jones J, Brautigam R, Kramer W, Binder J. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 175–81
- Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, Balakrishnan G, Hemal A, Shrivastava A, et al. Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002; 60: 569–72
- Menon M, Shrisvastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002; 168: 945–9
- Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Bhaandari A, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 701–17
- Ahlering T, Skarecky, Lee D, Clayman R. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003; 170: 1738–41
- Carlsson S, Nilsson A, Wiklund NP. Urinary incontinence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2006; 40: 103–7
- Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000; 163: 1643–9
- Rassweilier J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Freed T. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003; 169: 1689–93
- Turk I, Deger S, Winkelmann B, Schonberger B, Loening SA. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical aspects and experience with 125 cases. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 46–52
- Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 189–202
- Eden CG, Cahill D, Vass J, Adams T, Dauleh M. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series. BJU Int 2002; 90: 876–82
- Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards RA, Lee DI, Skarecky DW. Robotic radical prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins. Urology 2004; 64: 1224–8
- Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Skarecky D. Early potency outcomes with cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation with robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2005; 19: 715–8
- Hasson H, Rotman C, Rana N, Kumari N. Open laparoscopy: 29-year experience. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 763–6
- Tewari A, Vallancien G, Delmas V, Hemal AK, Guillonneau B, Menon M. An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 444–54
- Walsh P. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the technique. J Urol 1998; 160: 2418–24
- Ong AM, Su LM, Varkarakis I, Inagaki T, Link R, Bhayani SB, et al. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: effects of hemostatic energy sources on the recovery of cavernous nerve function in a canine model. J Urol 2004; 172: 1318–22
- Van Velthoven R, Ahlering T, Peltier A, Skarecky D, Clayman R. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology 2003; 61: 699–702
- Zlotta A, Roumeguère T, Ravery V, Hoffman P, Montorsi F, Türkeri L, et al. Is seminal vesicle ablation mandatory for all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis on 1283 patients. Eur Urol 2004; 46: 42–9
- Partin A, Mangold L, Lamm D, Walsh P, Epstein J, Pearson J. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin tables) for the new millennium. Urology 2001; 58: 843–8