Composition and clinically determined hardness of urinary tract stones

References

• Lingeman JE, Smith LH, Woods JR, Newman DM. Surgical evaluation and treatment of the stone patient In: Lingeman JE, Smith LH, Woods JR, Newman DM. Urinary calculi—ESWL, endourology and medical therapy Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1989. p. 134–62.
   Google Scholar
• Wu TT, Hsu TH, Chen M-T, Chang LS. Efficacy of in vitro stone fragmentation by extracorporeal, electrohydraulic and pulsed-dye laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 1993; 7: 391–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dretler SP. Calculus breakability—fragility and durility. J Endourol 1994; 8: 1–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong P, Preminger G. Mechanisms of differing stone fragility in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 1994; 8: 263–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto W, Kishimoto T, Tagegaki Y, Sugimoto T, Wada S, Yamamoto K, et al. Stone fragility—measurement of stone mineral content by dual photon absorptiometry. Eur Urol 1991; 20: 150–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen NP, Whitfield HN. Mechanical testing of urinary calculi. World J Urol 1993; 11: 13–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dretler SP. Stone fragility: a therapeutic distinction. Shock wave lithotripsy. State of the art, JE Lingeman, DM Newman. Plenum Press, New York 1988; 142–5
   Google Scholar
• Wang YH, Grenabo L, Hedelin H, Pettersson S, Wikholm G, Zachrisson F. Analysis of stone fragility in vitro with piezoelectric shock waves using the EDAP LT-01. J Urol 1993; 149: 699–702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JC, Jr, Saw KC, Paterson RF, Hatt EK, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE. Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 2003; 61: 1092–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan JP, Finlayson B. An experimental model for the systematic investigation of stone fracture by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1988; 140: 395–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiselius HG, Andersson A. Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal. How can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine?. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 275–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoneim IA, Ziada AM, Elkatib SE. Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL): a focus on the infundibulopelvic anatomy. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 296–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin JM, Rao PN. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the new millennium. Kidney stones: inside & out, MDI Gohel, DWT Au. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong 2004; 252–8
   Google Scholar
• Coz F, Orvieto M, Bustos M, Lyng R, Stein C, Hinrichs A, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of 2000 urinary calculi with the Modulith LS-20: success and failure according to size and location of stones. J Endourol 2000; 14: 239–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner Ch, Rossweiler J. Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Nephron 1999; 81(Suppl 1)71–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küpeli B, Biri H, Sinik Z, Karaca K, Tuncayengin A, Karaglan Ü, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower caliceal calculi. Eur Urol 1998; 34: 203–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grampsas SA, Moore M, Chandoke PS. 10-year experience with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the state of Colorado. J Endourol 2000; 14: 711–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Chaussy C, Thüroff S. Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy—an update. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 187–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Cass AS. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in morbidly obese patients. J Urol 1993; 150: 30–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring LC. Observation on the analysis of ten thousand urinary calculi. J Urol 1962; 55: 545–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider HJ. Analysis of urinary calculi and its significance in the therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena) 1978;72:380–4 (in German).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brien G, Schubert G, Bick C. 10000 analyses of urinary calculi using x-ray diffraction and polarizing microscopy. Eur Urol 1982; 8: 251–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otnes B. Crystalline composition of urinary stones in Norwegian patients. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1983; 17: 85–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daudon M, Hennequin C, Lacour B, LeMoel G, Donsimoni R, Fellahi S, et al. Sex and age-related composition of 10617 calculi analyzed by infrared-spectroscopy. Urol Res 1995; 23: 319–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatta KM, Prien EL, Jr, Dretler SP. Cystine calculi—rough and smooth: a new clinical distinction. J Urol 1989; 142: 937–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackermann D, Griffith DP, Dunthorn M, Newman RC, Finlayson B. Calculation of stone volume and urinary stone staging with computer assistance. J Endourol 1989; 3: 355–60
   Google Scholar
• Lam HS, Ligeman JE, Russo R, Choa GT. Stone surface area determination techniques: a unifying concept of staghorn stone burden assessment. J Urol 1992; 148: 1026–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiselius HG. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) of ureteral stones has remained as a successful treatment also with later generations of lithotripters. Abstract. 22nd World Congress on Endourology and SWL, Mumbai-India 2004. J Endourol 2004; 18(Suppl 1)A112
   Google Scholar
• Dretler SP, Polykoff C. Calcium oxalate stone morphology: fine tuning our therapeutic distinctions. J Urol 1996; 155: 828–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw KC, McAteer JA, Fineberg NS, Monga AG, Chua GT, Lingeman JE, et al. Calcium stone fragility is predicted by helical CT attenuation values. J Endourol 2000; 14: 471–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar