2
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

The Value of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound in Assessment of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Clinically Locally Confined Carcinoma of the Prostate

, , &
Pages 7-10 | Published online: 31 Mar 2016

References

  • Altwein JE, Leitenberger A, Ay R. Wert der Computertomographie und Lymphographie zum Nachweis von pelvinen Lymphknoten Metastasen beim Prostatakarzinom. Urol Int 1984; 39:178–183.
  • Benson KH, Watson RA, Spring DB, Agee RE. The value of computerized tomography in evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes. J Urol 1981; 126:63–64.
  • Beyer D, Peters PE, Friedman G. Leistungsbreite der Realtime-Sonographie bei Lymphknotenerkrankungen. Röntgenpraxis 1982; 35:393–403.
  • Blackledge G, Best JJK, Crowther D, Isherwood I. Computed tomography (CT) in the staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease. A report on 136 patients. Clin Radiol 1980; 31:143–147.
  • Brendler CB, Cleeve LK, Anderson EE, Paulson DF. Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: risk versus benefit. J Urol 1980; 124: 849–850.
  • Burney BT, Klatte EC. Ultrasound and computed tomography of the abdomen in the staging and management of testicular carcinoma. Radiology 1979; 132:415–419.
  • Donohue RE, Mani JH, Whitesel JA, Mohr S, Scanavino D, Augspurger RR, Biber RJ, Fauver HE, Wettlaufer JN, Pfister RR. Pelvic lymph node dissection. Guide to patient management in clinically locally confined adenocarcinoma of prostate. Urology 1982; 20:559–565.
  • Ellert J, Kreel L. The role of computed tomography in the initial staging and subsequent management of the lymphomas. J Comput AssTomogr 1980; 4:368–391.
  • Emory TH, Reinke DB, Hill AL, Lange PH. Use of CT to reduce understaging in prostatic cancer. Comparison with conventional staging techniques. Am J Roentgenol 1983; 141:351–354.
  • Flanigan RC, Mohler JL, King CT, Atwell JR, Umer MA, Loh FK, McRoberts JW. Preoperative lymph node evaluation in prostatic cancer patients who are surgical candidates. The role of lymphangiography and computerized tomography scanning with direct fine needle aspiration. J Urol 1985; 134:84–87.
  • Golimbu M, Schinella R, Morales P, Kurusu S. Differences in pathological characteristic and prognosis of clinical A2 prostatic cancer from A1 and B disease. J Urol 1978; 119:618–622.
  • Grossman IC, Carpiniello V, Greenberg SH, Malloy TR, Wein AJ. Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: review of 91 cases. J Urol 1980; 124:632–634.
  • Hilaris BS, Whitemore WF, Batata M, Barzell W. Behavioral patterns of prostate adenocarcinoma following an I125 implant and pelvic node dissection. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 1977; 2:631–637.
  • Lee JKT, Stanley RJ, Sagel SS, McClennan BL. Accuracy of CT in detecting intraabdominal and pelvic lymph node metastases from pelvic cancers. Am J Roentgenol 1978; 131:675–679.
  • Levine MS, Arger PH, Coleman BG, Mulhern CG Jr, Pollack HM, Wein AJ. Detecting lymphatic metastases from prostatic carcinoma. Superiority of CT. Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137:207–211.
  • Magnusson A, Hagberg H, Hemmingsson A, Lindgren PG. Pre- and postoperative abdominal examinations in testicular carcinoma. Acta Radiol Diagnosis 1982; 23: 203–208.
  • Morgan CL, Calkins RF, Calvalcanti EJ. Computed tomography in the evaluation, staging and therapy of carcinoma of the bladder and prostate. Radiology 1981; 140:751–761.
  • Nicholson TC, Richie JP. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage B1 adenocarcinoma of the prostate: justified or not? J Urol 1977; 117:199–201.
  • Paulson DF. Assessment of anatomic extent and biologic hazard of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Urology 1980; 15:537–541.
  • Sawcquk IS, De Vere White R, Palmer Gold R, Olsson CA. Sensitivity of computed tomography in evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastases from carcinoma of bladder and prostate. Urology 1983; 21: 81–84.
  • Scardino PT, Guerriero WG, Carlton CE. Surgical staging and combined therapy with radioactive gold grain implantation and external irradiation. In: Johnson DE, Boilien MA, eds. Genitourinary tumors: Fundamental principles and surgical techniques. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1982:75.
  • Schubert J, Heidl G. The value of various methods for determining lymphatic metastases in prostatic carcinoma. Eur Urol 1983; 9:257–261.
  • Spellman MC, Castellino RA, Ray GR, Pistenma DA, Bagshaw MA. An evaluation of lymphography in localized carcinoma of the prostate. Radiology 1977; 125:637–644.
  • Wallace DM, Chisholm GD, Hendry WF. T.N.M. classification for urological tumours. Br J Urol 1975; 47:1–12.
  • Weinerman PM, Arger PH, Coleman BG, Pollack HM, Banner MP, Wein AJ. Pelvic adenopathy from bladder and prostate carcinoma. Detection by rapidsequence computed tomography. Am J Roentgenol 1985; 140:95–100.
  • Zincke H, Farrow GM, Meyers RP, Benson RP Jr, Furlow WL, Utz DC. Relationship between grade and stage of adenocarcinoma of the prostate and regional pelvic lymph node metastases. J Urol 1982; 128:498–501.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.