REFERENCES
- Celsus: De me icina. Translated by C. Des Estanges, 1846.
- Frazier H, Robertson J, Paulson D. Radical prostatect-omy: the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach. J Urol 1992; 147: 888–890.
- Haab F, Boccon-Gibod L, Toublanc M. Perineal versus retropubic prostatectomy for TI, T2 prostate cancer. Br J Urol 1994; 74: 626–629.
- Hirvonen G, Nuutinen LS, Kauko M. Hemodynamic changes due to Trendelenburg positioning and pneumo-peritoneum during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Anasthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 949–955.
- Paulson D. Perineal prostatectomy. In: Campbell's urology, 6th ed. Philadelphia, London, Toronto, Mon-treal, Sydney, Tokyo: W. B. Saunders, 1992: 2887–2899.
- Wilcox Z, Vandam L. Alas, poor Trendelenburg and his position! A critique of its uses and effectiveness. Anesth Analg 1988; 67: 574–578.
- Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1905; 16: 315–321.