REFERENCES
- Horder M, Rasmussen F. Acid phosphatases and other tumor markers in the management of prostatic cancer. Scand J Clin Invest 1985; 45 Suppl 179: 1–117.
- Benson Jr RC, Gill GMG. Estramustine phosphate compared with diethylstilbestrol. Am J Clin Oncol 1986; 9: 341–51.
- Hedlund PO, Jacob sson H, Vaage S, Hahne B, Sandin T, Kontturi M, et al. Treatment of high-grade, high-stage prostate cancer with estramustine phosphate or diethyl-stilbestrol. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1996; 31: 167–72.
- Jorgensen T, Tveter KJ—and the members of the SPCG-2 group. Total androgen suppression: experience from the Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study No. 2 Eur Urol 1993; 24: 466–70.
- Jorgensen T. Prognostic factors in metastatic prostate cancer: experience based on the SPCG Study No 2: In press.
- Aro J, Ruutu M, Juusela H, Hansson E, Permi J—and the Finnprost Group. Polyestradiol phosphate (160 mg/ month) or LHRH analog (Buserelin depot) in the treatment of locally advanced or metastasized prostatic cancer. Ann Chir et Gyn 1993; 82: 5–8.
- Henriksson P. Blombäck M, Eriksson A, Stege R, Carlström K. Effect of parenteral oestrogen on the coagulation system in patients with prostatic carcinoma. Br J Urol 1990; 65: 282–5.
- Lukkarinen O, Kontturi M—and the Finnish Zoladex Multicenter Study Group. Comparison of a long-acting LHRH agonist and polyestradiol phosphate in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1994; 28: 171–8.
- Mikkola AKK, Ruutu ML, Aro JIN, Rannikko SAS, Salo JO—on behalf of the Finnprost Group. Parenteral polyestradiol phosphate vs orchiectomy in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. Efficacy and cardiovas-cular complications: a 2-year follow-up report of a national, prospective prostatic cancer study. Br J Urol 1998; 82: 63–8.
- Hedlund PO, Gustafsson H, Sjögren S. Cardiovascular complications to treatment of prostate cancer with estramustine phosphate (Estracyt6) or conventional estrogen. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1980; 14 Suppl 55: 103–5.
- Iversen P. Carcinoma of the prostate. Views and recommendations. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1991; 25 Suppl 139: 1–63.