Publication Cover
Science Activities
Projects and Curriculum Ideas in STEM Classrooms
Volume 53, 2016 - Issue 1: Science and Literacy Integration
471
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

WordSift: A free web-based vocabulary tool designed to help science teachers in integrating interactive literacy activities

, , &

References

  • American Geophysical Union. 1995. Seismic Sleuths. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1646-20490-4697/fema253.pdf. Accessed: July 21, 2015
  • Baker, S., N. Lesaux, M. Jayanthi, J. Dimino, C. P. Proctor, J. Morris, R. Gersten, K. Haymond, M. J. Kieffer, S. Linan-Thompson, and R. Newman-Gonchar. 2014. Teaching Academic Content and Literacy to English Learners in Elementary and Middle School (NCEE 2014–4012). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications_reviews.aspx. Accessed: July 21, 2015
  • Blachowicz, C., P. Fisher, and D. Ogle. 2006. Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly 41(4): 524–539.
  • Bunch, G. 2013. Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education 37(1): 298–341.
  • Common Core Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts ans Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards. Accessed: July 21, 2015
  • Coxhead, A. 2000. A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly 34(2): 213–238.
  • Decarrico, J. 2001. Vocabulary learning and teaching. In Teaching English as a second or foreign language, ed. Marianne Celce-Mucia, 285–299. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Gersten, R., S. K. Baker, T. Shanahan, S. Linan-Thompson, P. Collins, and R. Scarcella. 2007. Effective literacy and English language instruction for English learners in the elementary grades: A practice guide (NCEE 2007–4011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides.2007. Accessed: July 21, 2015
  • Goldenberg, C. 2013. Unlocking the research on English learners: What we know—and don't yet know—about effective instruction. American Educator (Summer). http://www.aft.org/pubsreports/american_educator/issues/summer13/goldenberg.pdf. Accessed: July 21, 2015
  • Goossens, N., G. Camp, P. Verkoeijen, and H. Tabbers. 2014. The effect of retrieval practice in primary school vocabulary learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28(1): 135–142.
  • Marzano, R., and D. Pickering. 2005. Building academic vocabulary: Teacher's manual. Alexandria: ASCD.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. 2010. Projection of education statistics to 2010. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000071. Accessed: July 21, 2015
  • Nystrand, M. 2006. Research on the role of discussion as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English 40(4): 392–412.
  • NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Norris, S. P., and L. Phillips. 2003. How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education 87(2): 224–240.
  • Pearson, P. D., E. Moje, and C. Greenleaf. 2010. Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science 328: 459–463.
  • Serafini, F. 2012. Reading multimodal texts in the 21st century. Research in the Schools 19(1): 26–32.
  • Snow, C. 2008. What is the vocabulary of science? In Teaching science to English language learners, ed. Ann Rosebery and Beth Warren, 71–83. Arlington: NSTA Press.
  • Wellington, J., and J. Osborne. 2001. Language and literacy in science education.Glasgow, UK: Open University Press.
  • Zwiers, J., and M. Crawford. 2011. Academic conversations: Classroom talk that fosters critical thinking and content understandings. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.