References
- Tolbert, S., Stoddart, T., Lyon, E. G., & Solís, J. (2014). The next generation science standards, common core state standards, and English language learners: A framework for pre-service secondary science teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(2), 65–90.
- Lyon, E. G., Tolbert, S., Solís, J., Stoddart, T., & Bunch, G. C. (in press). Secondary science teaching for English learners: Developing supportive and responsive learning contexts for sense-making and language development. Lanhman, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
- Achieve. 2013. Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: Author.
- Bruna, K. R., and Gomez, K. (Eds.). 2008. The work of language in multicultural classrooms: Talking science, writing science. New York: Routledge.
- Bunch, G. C. 2013. Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education 37(1): 298–341.
- Cervetti, G. N., Pearson, P. D., Barber, J., Hiebert, E., and Bravo, M. A. 2007. Integrating literacy and science: The research we have, the research we need. In Shaping literacy achievement, ed. M. Pressley, A. K. Billman, K. Perry, K. Refitt, and J. Reynolds, 157–174. New York: Guilford.
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. 2010. http://www.corestandards.org. Accessed: June 1, 2015
- Council of Chief State School Officers. 2012. Framework for English Language Proficiency Development Standards corresponding to the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, DC: CCSSO.
- Driver, R., Newton, P., and Osborne, J. 2000. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education 84(3): 287–312.
- Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R., LeRoy, K., and Secada, W. 2008. Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45(1): 31–52.
- Lee, O., Quinn, H., and Valdés, G. 2013. Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher 42: 234–249.
- Markos, A. M. 2012. Mandated to learn, guided to reflect: Preservice teachers' evolving understanding of English language learners. Issues in Teacher Education 21: 39–57.
- Moje, E. B. 2007. Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education 31(1): 1–44.
- National Center for Education Statistics. 2011. The nation's report card: Science 2009. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
- National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Osborne, J. E., and Simon, S. 2004. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41(10): 994–1020.
- Osborne, J. F., and Patterson, A. 2011. Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education 95(4): 627–638.
- Palinscar, A., and Brown, A. 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1: 117–175.
- Passmore, C., Coleman, E., Horton, J., and Parker, H. 2013. Making sense of natural selection. Science Teacher 80(6): 43–49.
- Scarcella, R. 2003. Academic English: A conceptual framework. University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute Technical Report 2003–1. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6pd082d4#page-2 Accessed: June 1, 2015.
- Windschitl, M. 2008. What is inquiry? A framework for thinking about authentic scientific practice in the classroom. In Science as inquiry in the secondary setting, ed. J. Luft, R. L. Bell, and J. Gess-Newsome, 1–20. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.