Science inquiry and writing for ELLs: A gateway for building understanding and academic language

References

• Butler, M. B., and C. N. Nesbit. 2008. Using science notebooks to improve writing skills and conceptual understanding. Science Activities 44(4): 137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., J. A., Taylor, A. Gardner, P. Van Scotter, C. Powell, A. Westbrook, N. Landes, S. Spiegel, M. McGarrigle Stuhlsatz, A. Ellis, B. Resch, H. Thomas, M. Bloom, R. Moran, S. Getty, and N. Knapp. 2006. The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications executive summary. Colorado Springs: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. 1994. The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. 2010. Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. http://www.corestandards.org. Accessed: June 1, 2015
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. 2006. The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education 28(5): 491–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., and Y. Wei. 2010. Improving middle school students' science literacy through reading infusion. Journal of Educational Research 103(4): 262–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrichs, L. F., and P. P. M. Leseman. 2014. Early science instruction and academic language development can go hand in hand. The promising effects of a low-intensity teacher focused intervention. International Journal of Science Education 36(17): 2978–2995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huerta, M., and J. Jackson. 2010. “Connecting literacy and science to increase achievement for English language learners.” Early Childhood Education Journal 38(3): 205–11.
   Google Scholar
• Huerta, M., and F. Tong, B. J. Irby, R. Lara-Alecio. Forthcoming. “Measuring and comparing academic language development and conceptual understanding via science notebooks.” The Journal of Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J., N. Lesaux, M. Rivera, and D. J. Francis. 2009. Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research 29(3): 1168–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O. 2005. Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research 75(4): 491–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., J. Maerten-Rivera, R. D. Penfield, K. LeRoy, and W. G. Secada. 2008. Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 4(1): 31–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). 2009. The nation's report card: Science 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbit, C. R., T. Y. Hargrove, L. Harrelson, and B. Maxey. 2004. Science notebooks in the primary grades. Science Activities 40(4): 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, D.C.: Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W. 2010. Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussion through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47(4): 422–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. 2013. Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal 44(1): 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. M., and S. O. Nagashima, S. O. 2009. The achievement of student subgroups on science performance assessments in inquiry-based classrooms. Electronic Journal of Science Education 13(2): 6–29.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. 2009. English language proficiency standards. http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter074/ch074a.html#74.4. Accessed: June 1, 2015
   Google Scholar
• Tong, F., and B. J. Irby, R. Lara-Alecio, C. Guerrero, Y. Fan, M. Huerta. 2014. “A randomized study of a literacy integrated science intervention for low SES middle school students: Findings from first year implementation.” International Journal of Science Education 36(12): 2083–2109.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L., B. Hand, S. Goldman, G. Hildebrand, J. Osborne, D. Treagust, and C. Wallace. 2004. New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly 39(3): 347–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar