Publication Cover
Science Activities
Projects and Curriculum Ideas in STEM Classrooms
Volume 56, 2019 - Issue 1
438
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An argumentation activity for third-grade students: objects in the plates

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Acar, Ö., Z. Tola, S. Karaçam, and A. Bilgin. 2016. “Argümantasyon destekli Fen öğretiminin 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin kavramsal anlamalarına, bilimsel düşünme becerilerine ve bilimin doğası anlayışlarına olan etkisi.” [The effect of argumentation supported science instruction on 6th graders' understanding of conceptual knowledge, scientific reasoning skills and nature of science]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 16 (3):730–49.
  • Bağ, H., and M. Çalık. 2017. Athematic review of argumentation studies at the K-8 level. Education Sciences 42 (190):281–303. doi: 10.15390/EB.2017.6845.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. 2018. Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 3,4,5,6,7 ve 8. Sınıflar) [Science instruction program (elementary and Middle school 3,4,5,6,7, and 8th grades)]. Ankara, Turkey: Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
  • Boyraz, D. S., Y. Hacioğlu, and M. Aygün. 2016. “Argümantasyon ve kavram karmaşası: Erime ve çözünme. [Argumentation and concepts confusion: Melting and dissolving]”. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 36 (2):233–67.
  • Çetinkaya, E., and M. F. Taşar. 2018. “Fen bilimleri eğitimi alanında Türkiye merkezli argümantasyon araştırmalarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi.” [Examining the argumentation researches at the science education in Turkey]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 33 (2):353–81. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2017030625.
  • Demirel, R. 2015. The effect of individual and group argumentation on student academic achievement in force and movement issues. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education (JPTE) 11 (3):916–48.
  • Evagorou, M., and J. Osborne. 2013. Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (2):209–37. doi: 10.1002/tea.21076.
  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., and S. Erduran. 2008. Argumentation in science education: An overview. In Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, ed. S Erduran and M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre, 3–27. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Kardaş, N. 2013. Fen eğitiminde argümantasyon odaklı öğretimin öğrencilerin karar verme ve problem çözme becerilerine etkisi [The impact of argumentation focused teaching in science education on the decision making and problem solving skills of students]. Masters thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Turkey.
  • Krajcik, J., and K. L. McNeill. 2015. Designing and assessing scientific explanation tasks. In Encyclopedia of science education, ed. Richard Gunstone, 285–290. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media.
  • Lemke, J. 1990. Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Lin, T.-C., T.-J. Lin, and C.-C. Tsai. 2014. Research trends in science education from 2008 to 2012: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education 36 (8):1346–72. doi: 10.1080/09500690802314876.
  • Maloney, J., and S. Simon. 2006. Mapping children’s discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education 28 (15):1817–41. doi: 10.1080/09500690600855419.
  • McNeill, K. L., and J. Krajcik. 2012. Supporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence and reasoning framework for talk and writing. New York, NY: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
  • Namdar, B., and A. Demir. 2016. “Örümcek mi böcek mi? 5. Sınıf öğrencileri için argümantasyon tabanlı sınıflandırma etkinliği.” [A spider or an insect? Argumentation based classification activity for fifth graders]” Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi 6 (1):1–9.
  • Namdar, B., and İB. Tuskan. 2018. “Fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin argümantasyona yönelik görüşleri.” [Science teachers’ views of scientific argumentation] Hacettepe University Journal of Education 33 (1):1–22. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2017030137.
  • National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on conceptual framework for the new K-12 science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • NGSS Leads States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Öğreten, B., and Ş. Uluçınar-Sağır. 2014. “Argümantasyona dayalı fen öğretiminin etkililiğinin incelenmesi [Examining the effectiveness of science teaching based on argumentation]”. Journal of Turkish Science Education 11 (1):75–100. doi: 10.12973/tused.10104a.
  • Roberts, D. A. 2007. Scientific literacy/science literacy. In Handbook of research on science education, ed. S.K. Abell and N.G. Lederman, 729–780. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Sampson, V., and M. R. Blanchard. 2012. Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (9):1122–48. doi: 10.1002/tea.21037.
  • Sampson, V., P. Enderle, and J. Grooms. 2013. Argumentation in science education: Helping students understand the nature of scientific argumentation so they can meet the new science standards. The Science Teacher 80 (5):30–33.
  • Schworm, S., and A. Renkl. 2007. Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (2):285–96. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.285.
  • Ulu, C., and H. Bayram. 2015. “Argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme yaklaşımına dayalı laboratuvar etkinliklerinin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin kavram öğrenmelerine etkisi: yaşamımızdaki elektrik ünitesi. [Effects of laboratory activities through the argumentation baased inquiry approach on 7th grade students' conceptual learning electricity in our daily life unit].” Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 37 (1):63–77.
  • Uluçınar Sağır, Ş., and Z. Kılıç. 2013. “İlköğretim öğrencilerinin bilimin doğasını anlama düzeylerine bilimsel tartışma odaklı öğretimin etkisi [The effect of argumentation based teaching on the understanding levels of primary school students about the nature of science].” Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 44:308–18.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.