References
- Aljawarneh, S. A. 2020. Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 32 (1):57–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09207-0.
- Ampartzaki, M., and M. Kalogiannakis. 2016. Astronomy in early childhood education: A concept-based approach. Early Childhood Education Journal 44 (2):169–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0706-5.
- Betzner, J. P., and E. A. Marek. 2014. Teacher and student perceptions of earth science and its educational value in secondary schools. Creative Education 05 (11):1019–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.511116.
- Blake, C., and E. Scanlon. 2007. Reconsidering simulations in science education at a distance: Features of effective use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 (6):491–502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00239.x.
- Brewer, J. A. 2001. Introduction to early childhood education: Preschool through primary grades. Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Buckner, M., J. Strahle, and S. Tammen. 2020. Guidelines for teaching astronomy online. In Astronomy Education, Volume 2: Best practices for online learning environments, ed. C. Impey and M. Wenger, 1–8. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/2514-3433/abb3ddch1.
- Cassady, J. C., and L. Mullen. 2006. Reconceptualising electronic field trips: A Deweyian perspective. Learning, Media and Technology 31 (2):149–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880600756720.
- Chiras, A. 2008. Day/night cycle: Mental models of primary school children. Science Education International 19 (1):65–83.
- Cox, M., A. Steegen, and M. De Cock. 2016. How aware are teachers of students’ misconceptions in astronomy? A qualitative analysis in Belgium. Science Education International 27 (2):277–300.
- Darling-Hammond, L., A. Schachner, A. K. Edgerton, A. Badrinarayan, J. Cardichon, P. W.Jr.Cookson, M. Griffith, S. Klevan, A. Maier, M. Martinez, et al. 2020. Restarting and reinventing school: Learning in the time of COVID and beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
- Dawson, V., and L. Moore. 2011. Teachers’ perspectives of the new earth and environmental science course: Lessons from the Australian curriculum. Teaching Science 57 (1):19–27.
- de Jong, T., D. Gillet, M. J. Rodríguez-Triana, T. Hovardas, D. Dikke, R. Doran, O. Dziabenko, J. Koslowsky, M. Korventausta, E. Law, et al. 2021. Understanding teacher design practices for digital inquiry-based science learning: The case of Go-Lab. Educational Technology Research and Development: ETR & D 69 (2):417–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09904-z.
- Denney, J. 2005. Shadow science: Astronomy in the Schoolyard. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 42 (1):3–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/SATS.42.1.3-8.
- Eshach, H. 2007. Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 16 (2):171–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1.
- Flarend, A., and C. Palma. 2013. The role of gravity in planetary orbits. The Earth Scientist 29 (2):32–6.
- Forbes, C. 2011. Preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based elementary science. Science Education 95 (5):927–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20444.
- Gazit, E., Y. Yair, and D. Chen. 2005. Emerging conceptual understanding of complex astronomical phenomena by using a virtual solar system. Journal of Science Education and Technology 14 (5–6):459–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-0221-3.
- Giasiranis, S., and L. Sofos. 2016. Production and evaluation of educational material using augmented reality for teaching the module of “Representation of information on computers” in junior high school. Creative Education 07 (09):1270–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.79134.
- Heward, W. L., and J. S. Twyman. 2021. Teach more in less time: Introduction to the special section on direct instruction. Behavior Analysis in Practice 14 (3):763–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00639-8.
- Huang, R. H., J. M. Spector, and J. F. Yang. 2019. Educational Technology: A primer for the 21st century. Singapore: Springer.
- Jerasa, S., and T. Boffone. 2021. BookTok 101: TikTok, digital literacies, and out-of-school reading practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 65 (3):219–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1199.
- Kallery, M. 2011. Astronomical concepts and events awareness for young children. International Journal of Science Education 33 (3):341–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903469082.
- Kinder, D., R. Kubina, and N. E. Marchand-Martella. 2005. Special education and direct instruction: An effective combination. Journal of Direct Instruction 5:1–36.
- Kontkanen, S., P. Dillon, T. Valtonen, S. Renkola, M. Vesisenaho, and P. Väisänen. 2016. Pre-service teachers’ experiences of ICT in daily life and in educational contexts and their proto-technological pedagogical knowledge. Education and Information Technologies 21 (4):919–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9361-5.
- Lelliott, A., and M. Rollnick. 2010. Big ideas: A review of astronomy education research 1974-2008. International Journal of Science Education 32 (13):1771–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903214546.
- Lin, Y.-C., T.-C. Liu, and J. Sweller. 2015. Improving the frame design of computer simulations for learning: Determining the primacy of the isolated elements or the transient information effects. Computers & Education 88:280–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.06.001.
- Liu, S. 2005. Models of ‘the Heavens and the Earth’: An investigation of German and Taiwanese students’ alternative conceptions of the Universe. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3 (2):295–325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-4032-4.
- McLoughlin, C., and M. J. W. Lee. 2008. The 3 P’s of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 20 (1):10–27.
- Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. 2018. Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 3,4,5,6,7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Science curriculum (Primary and middle school 3,4,5,6,7 and 8th grades)]. Ankara.
- Moore, M. G. 1989. Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education 3 (2):1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659.
- NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Research Council, Washington, DC.
- Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications.
- Pérez-Lisboa, S., C. G. Ríos-Binimelis, and J. Castillo Allaria. 2019. Augmented reality and stellarium: Astronomy for children of five years. Alteridad 15 (1):25–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v15n1.2020.02.
- Plummer, J. D. 2014. Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression. Studies in Science Education 50 (1):1–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.869039.
- Plummer, J. D., A. Kocareli, and C. Slagle. 2014. Learning to explain astronomy across moving frames of reference: Exploring the role of classroom and planetarium-based instructional contexts. International Journal of Science Education 36 (7):1083–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.843211.
- Plummer, J. D., and J. Krajcik. 2010. Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an Earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (7):768–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20355.
- Plummer, J. D., S. Schmoll, K. C. Yu, and C. Ghent. 2015. A guide to conducting educational research in a planetarium. Planetarium 44 (2):8–24.
- Pöntinen, S., P. Dillon, and P. Väisänen. 2017. Student teachers’ discourse about digital technologies and transitions between formal and informal learning contexts. Education and Information Technologies 22 (1):317–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9450-0.
- Rennie, J. L. 2014. Learning science outside of school. In Handbook of research on science education, ed. S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 120–44. New York: Routledge.
- Roberts, J. A. 1995. Mapping the Sun’s Path with a pinhole camera. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 32 (1):24–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.1995.10113171.
- Sackes, M. 2015. Kindergartners’ mental models of the day and night cycle: Implications for instructional practices in early childhood classrooms. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 15 (4):997–1006. doi: https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.4.2741.
- Slater, T. F., J. L. Safko, and J. R. Carpenter. 1999. Long-term attitude sustainability from a constructivist-based astronomy-for-teachers course. Journal of Geoscience Education 47 (4):366–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-47.4.366.
- Spathopoulos, V. M. 2021. A set of student activities for the simulation of ancient and medieval astronomical observations. Physics Education 56 (2):023010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abdee0.
- Squire, K. D. 2022. From virtual to participatory learning with technology during COVID-19. E-Learning and Digital Media 19 (1):55–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211022926.
- Starakis, I., and K. Halkia. 2013. Addressing k-5 students’ and preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of seasonal change. Physics Education 49 (2):231–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/49/2/231.
- Stephen, W. H. 2008. Stellarium – a valuable resource for teaching astronomy in the classroom and beyond. Science Education News (SEN) 57 (2):83–6.
- Stevenson, O. 2011. From public policy to family practices: Researching the everyday realities of families’ technology use at home. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27 (4):336–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00430.x.
- Suárez, Á., M. Specht, F. Prinsen, M. Kalz, and S. Ternier. 2018. A review of the types of mobile activities in mobile inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education 118:38–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.004.
- Suhonen, J., and E. Sutinen. 2006. FODEM: Developing digital learning environments in widely dispersed learning communities. Educational Technology & Society 9 (3):43–55.
- Sun, L., Y. Tang, and W. Zuo. 2020. Coronavirus pushes education online. Nature Materials 19 (6):687 doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0678-8.
- Tang, K.-Y., C.-Y. Chang, and G.-J. Hwang. 2021. Trends in artificial intelligence-supported e-learning: A systematic review and co-citation network analys (1998–2019). Interactive Learning Environments, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1875001.
- Tao, Y., M. Oliver, and G. Venville. 2012. Long-term outcomes of early childhood science education: Insights from a cross-national comparative case study on conceptual understanding of science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10 (6):1269–1302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9335-2.
- Trumper, R. 2006. Teaching future teachers basic astronomy concepts –Sun-Earth-Moon relative movements– at a time of reform in science education. Research in Science & Technological Education 24 (1):85–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500485407.
- Trundle, K. C., R. K. Atwood, and J. E. Christopher. 2007. A longitudinal study of conceptual change: Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of Moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (2):303–326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20121.
- Trundle, K., and R. Bell. 2010. The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study. Computers & Education 54 (4):1078–1088. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.012.
- Türk, C., and H. Kalkan. 2015. The effect of planetariums on teaching specific astronomy concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology 24 (1):1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9516-6.
- Viberg, O., and A. Mavroudi. 2018. The role of ubiquitous computing and the internet of things for developing 21st century skills among learners: Experts’ views. In Lifelong technology-enhanced learning. EC-TEL 2018. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 11082, ed. V. Pammer-Schindler, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, H. Drachsler, R. Elferink, and M. Scheffel, 640–643. Singapore: Springer, Cham.
- Vosniadou, S. 1991. Designing curricula for conceptual restructuring: Lessons from the study of knowledge acquisition in astronomy. Journal of Curriculum Studies 23 (3):219–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027910230302.
- Vosniadou, S., and W. F. Brewer. 1994. Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science 18 (1):123–183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(94)90022-1.
- Yang, Y.-T. C., and W.-C. I. Wu. 2012. Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education 59 (2):339–352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012.
- Yu, K. C. 2005. Digital full-domes: The future of virtual astronomy education. Planetarian Journal of the International Planetarium Society 34 (3):6–11.
- Zhou, B. 2016. Smart classroom and multimedia network teaching platform application in college physical education teaching. International Journal of Smart Home 10 (10):145–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsh.2016.10.10.14.
- Zotti, G., S. M. Hoffmann, A. Wolf, F. Chéreau, and G. Chéreau. 2021. The simulated sky: Stellarium for cultural astronomy research. Journal of Skyscape Archaeology 6 (2):221–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1558/jsa.17822.