Arguing for Democracy: A Multimodal Approach to Argumentative Writing Instruction in the Social Studies Classroom

References

• Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S. W., & Jeffrey, J. V. (2009). Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks. Journal of literacy research, 41(2), 228–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornett, C. E. (2007). The arts as meaning makers: Integrating literature and the arts throughout the curriculum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Durst, R. K. (1987). Cognitive and linguistic demands of analytic writing. Research in the teaching of English, 21, 347–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Editorial Board (2017, February). The costs of Mr. Trump's dragnet. The New York Times, p. SR8.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, S. H., & Ochoa, A. (1988). Education for democratic citizenship: Decision making in the social studies. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Esparza, E. (2013, January 7). An excerpt of Sergio Hernandez' interview with Latinowood. Latin Heat Entertainment. Retrieved from www.latinheat.com.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1998). What is literacy? In Zamel, V. & Spack, R. (Eds.), Negotiating academic literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures, (pp. 51–59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Groarke, L. (2009). Five theses on Toulmin and visual argument. In F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation (pp. 229–239). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Groarke, L., Palczewski, C. H., & Godden, D. (2016). Navigating the visual turn inargument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52(4), 217–235.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Project Zero (2016). Visible thinking. Retrieved from www.visiblethinkingpz.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, D., & Seashore, K. (2003). Arts for academic achievement: summative evaluation report. Center for Applied Research and Education Improvement, College of Education and Human Development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2004). Gains and losses: new forms of text, knowledge and learning. Computers and Composition, 22, 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). College, career and civic life (C3 Framework) for social studies state standards. Silver Spring, MD: National Council for the Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association for Media Literacy Education. NAMLE. (2007). About NAMLE. Retrieved from www.namle.net.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M. (2002). Scaffolding argumentation in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 93(2), 79–83.
   Google Scholar
• Rabkin, N., & Redmond, R. (2004). Putting the arts in the picture: Reframing education in the 21st Century. Chicago, IL: Columbia College Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Rabkin, N., & Redmond, R. (2006). The arts make a difference. Educational Leadership, 63(5), 60–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (2008). Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civicengagement. Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F., & Gee, J. P. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teachingmultimodal literacy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, L. B., & Layne, S. (2010). Defining arts integration. Washington, DC: The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (updated ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating fordemocracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar