145
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Emergence and mating behavior of the oriental fruit moth Cydia molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and its potential for reproduction

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 446-453 | Accepted 06 Aug 2019, Published online: 25 Sep 2019

References

  • Andersson MB. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton (USA): Princeton University Press.
  • Baker TC, Cardé RT. 1979a. Courtship behavior of the oriental fruit moth (Grapholitha molesta): experimental analysis and consideration of the role of sexual selection in the evolution of courtship pheromones in the Lepidoptera. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 72:173–188.
  • Baker TC, Cardé RT. 1979b. Analysis of pheromone-mediated behaviors in male Grapholitha molesta, the oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environmental Entomology. 8:956–968.
  • Baker TC, Cardé RT. 1979c. Endogenous and exogenous factors affecting periodicities of female calling and male sex pheromone response in Grapholitha molesta (Busck). Journal of Insect Physiology. 25:943–950.
  • Baker TC, Meyer W, Roelofs WL. 1981a. Sex pheromone dosage and blend specificity of response by oriental fruit moth males. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata. 30:269–279.
  • Baker TC, Nishida R, Roelofs WL. 1981b. Close-range attraction of female oriental fruit moths to herbal scent of male hairpencils. Science. 214:1359–1361.
  • Cardé RT, Minks AK. 1995. Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints. Annual Review of Entomology. 40:559–585.
  • Chen MX, Luo YQ, Zhao CJ, Tao WQ, Ma WE, Wang H, Liu X, Ju YX. 2009. Research advance on Grapholitha molesta Busck. Northern Horticulture. 8:144–147.
  • Cherif A, Harbaoui K, Zappala L, Grissalebdi K. 2018. Efficacy of mass trapping and insecticides to control Tuta absoluta in Tunisia. Journal of Plant Diseases & Protection. 125:51–61.
  • de Morais RM, Redaelli LR, SantAna J. 2012. Age and multiple mating effects on reproductive success of Grapholita molesta (Busck)(Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Revista Brasileira De Entomologia. 56:319–324.
  • Dewsbury DA. 2015. Ejaculate cost and male choice. American Naturalist. 119:601–610.
  • Du J, Li GW, Xu XL, Wu JX. 2016. Development and fecundity performance of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) reared on shoots and fruits of peach and pear in different seasons. Environmental Entomology. 44:1522–1530.
  • Du J, Wang Y, Wu JX. 2010. Effect of four different artificial diets on development and reproduction of Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal Shanxi Agricultural University. 30:228–231.
  • Dustan G. 1964. Mating behaviour of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Canadian Entomologist. 96:1087–1093.
  • Emlen ST, Oring LW. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 197:215–223.
  • Fisher RA. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. New York (UK): Dover.
  • Fraser H, Trimble R. 2001. Effect of delayed mating on reproductive biology of the oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Canadian Entomologist. 133:219–227.
  • Han KS, Jung JK, Choi KH, Lee SW, Boo KS. 2001. Sex pheromone composition and male trapping of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Korea. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 4:31–35.
  • Howell JF 1980. Codling moth: measuring removal of males by sex pheromone trapping. Agricultural Research Results, Science and Education Administration (ARR-W-14).
  • Howell JF, Hutt RB, Hill WB. 1978. Codling moth: mating behavior in the laboratory. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 71:891–895.
  • Hu RS 2011. Research on temporal and spatial distribution of adults in Grapholitha molesta (Busck) [MSc thesis]. Taigu (China): Shanxi Agricultural University.
  • Kanga LH, Pree DJ, Van Lier JL, Walker GM. 2003. Management of insecticide resistance in oriental fruit moth (Grapholita molesta; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations from Ontario. Pest Management Science. 59:921–927.
  • Knight AL. 2009. Multiple mating of male and female codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple orchards treated with sex pheromone. Environmental Entomology. 36:157–164.
  • Kong WN, Hu RS, Zhao ZG, Li J, Zhang ZW, Li SC, Ma RY. 2014a. Effects of trap height, location, and spacing on pheromone-baited trap catch efficacy for oriental fruit moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in a peach orchard. Canadian Entomologist. 146:684–692.
  • Kong WN, Li J, Fan RJ, Li SC, Ma RY. 2014b. Sex-pheromone-mediated mating disruption technology for the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): overview and prospects. Psyche A Journal of Entomology. 2014:1–8.
  • Lance DR, Leonard DS, Mastro VC, Michelle W. 2016. Mating disruption as a suppression tactic in programs targeting regulated lepidopteran pests in US. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 42:590–605.
  • Li C, Wang F, Chen X, Zhou CL, Yao J. 2015. Adult Behavior of Tirumala limniace (Lepidoptera: Danaidae). Journal of Insect Science. 15:1–7.
  • Nishida R, Baker TC, Roelofs WL. 1982. Hairpencil pheromone components of male oriental fruit moths, Grapholitha molesta. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 8:947–959.
  • Sadek MM. 2001. Polyandry in field-collected Spodoptera littoralis moths and laboratory assessment of the effects of male mating history. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata. 98:165–172.
  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1967. Statistical methods. Ames (USA): Iowa State University Press.
  • Suckling DM, Elsayed AM, Walker T. 2016. Regulatory innovation, mating disruption and 4-PlayTM in New Zealand. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 42:584–589.
  • Svensson MGE. 1996. Sexual selection in moths: the role of chemical communication. Biological Reviews. 71:113–135.
  • Thornhill R. 1983. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. American Naturalist. 122:765–788.
  • Trimble RM, Pree DJ, Carter NJ. 2001. Integrated control of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in peach orchards using insecticide and mating disruption. Journal of Economic Entomology. 94:476–485.
  • Trivers RL 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Chicago (USA): Aldinc.
  • Wang Y, Kong WN, Zhao LL, Xiang HM, Zhang LJ, Li J, Ridsdill‐Smith J, Ma RY. 2018. Methods to measure performance of Grapholitha molesta on apples of five varieties. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata. 166:162–170.
  • Wiklund C. 2003. Sexual selection and the evolution of butterfly mating systems. In: Boggs C L, Watt W B and Ehrlich P R, editors. Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. Chicago (USA): University of Chicago Press; p. 67–90.
  • Zhang ZW, Men LN, Peng YF, Li J, Deng A, Chen Y, Liu XQ, Ma RY. 2017. Morphological differences of the reproductive system could be used to predict the optimum Grapholita molesta (Busck) control period. Scientific Reports. 7:1–14.
  • Zhao ZG 2012. Predicting and evaluation of oriental fruit moth by sex pheromone trapping. [PhD thesis]. Taigu (China): Shanxi Agricultural University.
  • Zhao ZG, Rong EH, Li SC, Zhang LJ, Kong WN, Hu RS, Zhang JT, Ma RY. 2013. Research on the practical parameters of sex pheromone traps for the oriental fruit moth. Pest Management Science. 69:1181–1186.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.