A Pragmatic Definition of the Concept of Theoretical Saturation

References

• Becker, Howard S. 1970. Sociological Work: Method and Substance. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, Harvey R. 2000. Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bertaux, Daniel. 1981. “From the Life-History Approach to the Transformation of Sociological Practice.” Pp. 29–45 in Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences, edited by Daniel Bertaux. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, Glenn A. 2008. “Naturalistic Inquiry and the Saturation Concept: A Research Note.” Qualitative Research 8 (1):137–52. doi: 10.1177/1468794107085301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2003. “Reclaiming Traditions and Re-Forming Trends in Qualitative Research.” Presented at the 20th Qualitative Analysis Conference—Traditions and Transitions, May 22–24, Carleton University, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, Juliet M. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13 (1):3–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. 2002. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman. K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, Ian. 1999. Grounding Grounded Theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Mary. 1984. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, Jill, J., Marie Johnston, Clare Robertson, Liz Glidewell, Vikki Ann Entwistle, Martin P Eccles, and Jeremy M Grimshaw. 2010. “What Is Adequate Sample Size? Operationalising Data Saturation for Theory-Based Interview Studies.” Psychology and Health 25 (10):1229–45. doi: 10.1080/08870440903194015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, George. 2000. “Individual and Group Interviewing.” Pp. 38–56 in Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound, edited by Martin, W. Bauer and George Gaskell. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney, G. 2001. The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney, G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Elizabeth and Jacqueline Low. 2008. ““Bodies Out of Time: Women’s Reproductive Firsts.” Pp. 189–97 in Sociology of the Body: A Reader, edited by Claudia Malacrida and Jacqueline Low. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Judith and Nicki Thorogood. 2004. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. 2006. “How Many Interviews are Enough? an Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18 (1):59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, C.A. 2003. “Multicultural Organization Development in Nonprofit Human Service Agencies: Views from the Field.” Journal of Community Practice 11 (1):39–59. doi: 10.1300/J125v11n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Jette, Dianne J., Lisa Grover, and Carol P. Keck. 2003. “A Qualitative Study of Clinical Decision Making in Recommending Discharge Placement from the Acute Care Setting.” Physical Therapy 83 (3):224–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Burke and Larry Christensen. 2004. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. 2nd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, Jerome and Marc L. Miller. 1986. Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, Richard. A. 2000. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzel, Anton. J. 1992. “Sampling in Qualitative Inquiry.” Pp. 31–44 in Doing Qualitative Research: Research Methods for Primary Care, Vol. 3, edited by Benjamin Crabtree and William Miller. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Langford, Barry, E., Gerald Schoenfeld, and George Izzo. 2002. “Nominal Grouping Sessions VS. Focus Groups.” Qualitative Market Research 5:58–70. doi: 10.1108/13522750210414517
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, Annette. 2012. “Using the Terms Hypothesis and Variable for Qualitative Work: A Critical Reflection.” Journal of Marriage and Family 74:671–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna and Egon Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Low, Jacqueline. 2004. Using Alternative Therapies: A Qualitative Analysis. Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, Mark. 2010. “Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews” [63 paragraphs]. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschungocial / Qualitative Social Research 11 (3), Art. 8, Available http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387 [2016, Sept. 26].
   Google Scholar
• Morse, Janice. M. 1994. “Designing Funded Qualitative Research.” Pp. 220–35 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, Janice. M. 1995. “The Significance of Saturation.” Qualitative Health Research 5:147–49. doi: 10.1177/104973239500500201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, Janice. M. 1998. “What’s Wrong with Random Selection?.” Qualitative Health Research 8:733–35. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, Janice, M. 2000. “Determining Sample Size.” Qualitative Health Research 10 (1):3–5. doi: 10.1177/104973200129118183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, Janice M., N. Barnett, M. Mayan, K. Olson, and J. Spiers. 2002. “Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1 (2) Article 2 doi: 10.1177/160940690200100202
   Google Scholar
• Morse, Wayde C., Damon R. Lowery, and Todd Steury. 2014. “Exploring Saturation of Themes and Spatial Locations in Qualitative Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Research.” Research, Society & Natural Resources 27 (5):557–71. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.888791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, Jeffrey. 2006. “Conceptualization in Symbolic Interactionism: The Problem of Cumulative Knowledge.” Paper presented at the Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research Conference, May 16–18, Niagara Falls, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, Michelle and Nicola Parker. 2012. “‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: A Critical Exploration of the Notion of Saturated Sample Sizes in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 13 (2):190–97. doi: 10.1177/1468794112446106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Nancy L. Leech. 2007. “A Call for Qualitative Power Analyses.” Quality and Quantity 41:105–21. doi: 10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, Catherine. K. 2009. “Review of Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide by Kathy Charmaz.” Symbolic Interaction 32 (4):390–93. doi: 10.1525/si.2009.32.4.390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, Jane, Jane Lewis, and Gillian Elam. 2003. “Designing and Selecting Samples.” Pp. 77–108 in Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, edited by Jane Ritchie and Jane Lewis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, Kevin, Anisa Zvonkovic, Abbie Goldberg, Elizabeth Sharp, and Ralph LaRossa. 2015. “Sampling Richness and Qualitative Integrity: Challenges for Research with Families.” Journal of Marriage and Family 77:243–60. doi: 10.1111/jomf.2015.77.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Gerry W. and H. Russell Bernard. 2003. “Techniques to Identify Themes.” Field Methods 1:85–109. doi: 10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, Margarete J. 2008. “Theoretical Saturation.” Pp. 875–76 in The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, edited by Lisa M. Given. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, Elizabeth. A. and Jean M. Ispa. 2006. “Matters of the Heart: Romantic Relationships.” Pp. 133–56 in Keepin’ On: The Everyday Struggles of Families in Poverty, edited by Jean. M. Ispa, Kathy R. Thornburg, and Mark A. Fine. Baltimore: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, David. 1998. “The Quality of Qualitative Health Research: The Open-Ended Interview and Its Alternative.” Social Sciences in Health 4 (2):104–18.
   Google Scholar
• Starks, Helen and Susan B. Trinidad. 2007. “Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory.” Qualitative Health Research 17 (10):1372–80. doi: 10.1177/1049732307307031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Bruce S. 2004. “Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory—Sample Size and Validity.” Retrieved September 8, 2009 (http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/research/studentdocs/mgt.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Malcolm. 2000. “Interpretivism and Generalisation.” Sociology 34 (2):209–24. doi: 10.1177/S0038038500000146
   Google Scholar
• Wray, Natalie, Milica Markovic, and Lenore Manderson. 2007. “Researcher Saturation: The Impact of Data Triangulation and Intensive-Research Practices on the Researcher and Qualitative Research Process.” Qualitative Health Research 17 (10):1392–402. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar