When Mobilization is Not Enough: Political Mediation, Framing, and the Use of Direct Democracy Devices by the Labor Movement in Response to Anti-Union Legislation

References

• Amenta, Edwin, Neal Caren, Elizabeth Chiarello, and Su. Yang. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 36:287–307. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amenta, Edwin, Neal Caren, and Sheera Joy Olasky. 2005. “Age for Leisure? Political Mediation and the Impact of the Pension Movement on U.S. Old-Age Policy.” American Sociological Review 70:516–38. doi:10.1177/000312240507000308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, Robert and David Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Brutal Numbers for Kasich, SB, 5.” 2011. Public Policy Polling, March 15. http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2011/03/brutal-numbers-for-kasich-sb-5.html
   Google Scholar
• Cress, Daniel and David Snow. 2000. “The Outcomes of Homeless Mobilization: The Influence of Organization, Disruption, Political Mediation and Framing.” American Journal of Sociology 105(4):1063–104. doi:10.1086/210399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantasia, Rick and Judit Stepan-Norris. 2004. “The Labor Movement in Motion.” Pp. 576–607 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by D. Snow, S. Soule, and H. Kriesi. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Richard and Eunice. Han. 2012. “The War against Public Sector Collective Bargaining in the US.” Journal of Industrial Relations 54(3):386–408. doi:10.1177/0022185612442279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergut, Ellen. 1990. “Institutions, Veto Points and Policy Results: A Comparative Analysis of Health Care.” Journal of Public Policy 10(4):391–416. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00006061.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16(1):57–85. doi:10.1017/S000712340000380X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2004. “Political Context and Opportunity.” Pp. 67–90 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by D. Snow, S. Soule, and H. Kriesi. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, Nelson. 2013. State of the Union: A Century of American Labor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, Steven. 2004. Reorganizing The Rust Belt: an Inside Story Of The American Labor Movement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, Doug, John McCarthy, and Mayer Zald. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAlevey, Jane. 2003. “It Takes a Community: Building Unions from the outside In.” New Labor Forum 12 (1):23–32.
   Google Scholar
• McCammon, Holly, Harmony Newman, Courtney Sanders Muse, and Teresa Terrell. 2007. “Movement Framing and Discursive Opportunity Structures: The Political Successes of the U.S. Women’s Jury Movement.” American Sociological Review 72(5):725–49. doi:10.1177/000312240707200504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCammon, Holly and Karen Campbell. 2001. “Winning the Vote in the West: The Political Success of the Women’s Suffrage Movements, 1866–1919.” Gender and Society 15(1):55–82. doi:10.1177/089124301015001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, David. 2004. “Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30:125–45. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milkman, Ruth. 2006. L.A. Story: Immigrant Workers and the Future of the U.S. Labor Movement. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rucht, Dieter. 1996. “The Impact of National Contexts on Social Movement Structures: A Cross-Movement and Cross-National Comparison.” Pp. 185–204 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framing, edited by D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, and M. Zald. New York: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Secunda, Paul. 2011. “The Wisconsin Public-Sector Labor Disputes of 2011.” ABA Journal of Labor and Employment Law 27 (2):293–306.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford Jr., Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51 (4):464–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, David A. and Robert D. Benford. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1:197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, Jason and Patrick Marley. 2013. “Federal Court of Appeals Upholds Walker’s Act 10 Union Law.” The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, January 18 (http://archive.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/federal-court-of-appeals-upholds-walkers-act-10-union-law-ur8eg0e-187488851.html/).
   Google Scholar
• Yates, Michael. 2011. Wisconsin Uprising: Labor Fights Back. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar