Centering and Decentering Women: U.S. Supreme Court Discrimination Opinions and a Discursive Struggle over Women’s Status

References

• Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society 4(2):139–58. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamany, David. 1973. “Legitimacy, Realigning Elections, and the Supreme Court.” Wisconsin Law Review 1973(3):790–846.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, Katharine T. 1991. “Feminist Legal Methods.” Pp. 370–403 in Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender, edited by K. T. Bartlett and R. Kennedy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berggren, Heidi M. 2008. “U.S. Family-Leave Policy: The Legacy of ‘Separate Spheres’.” International Journal of Social Welfare 17(4):312–23. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00554.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrey, Ellen, Robert L. Nelson, and Laura Beth Nielsen. 2017. Rights on Trial: How Workplace Discrimination Law Perpetuates Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brake, Deborah L. 2008. “What Counts as Discrimination in Ledbetter and the Implications for Sex Equality Law.” South Carolina Law Review 59(4):657–72.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, Rose M., and Nancy A. Heitzeg. 2008. “The Racialization of Crime and Punishment: Criminal Justice, Color-Blind Racism, and the Political Economy of the Prison Industrial Complex.” American Behavioral Scientist 51(5):625–44. doi:10.1177/0002764207307745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broverman, Inge K., Susan Raymond Vogel, Donald M. Broverman, Frank E. Clarkson, and Paul S. Rosenkrantz. 1972. “Sex Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal.” Journal of Social Issues 28(2):59–78. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00018.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbado, Devon W., and Cheryl I. Harris. 2019. “Intersectionality at 30: Mapping the Margins of Anti-Essentialism, Intersectionality, and Dominance Theory.” Harvard Law Review 132(8):2193–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamallas, Martha. 2013. Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory. 3rd ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989(1989):139–68.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, Alison Dahl. 2017. “Women’s Activism in Educational Institutions.” Pp. 582–601 in The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Women’s Social Movement Activism, edited by H. McCammon, V. Taylor, J. Reger, and R. Einwohner. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court As a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6(2):279–95.
   Google Scholar
• Devins, Neal, and Lawrence Baum. 2019. The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeWelde, Kristine, and Andi Stepnick. 2014. Disrupting the Culture of Silence: Confronting Gender Inequality and Making Change in Higher Education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dinner, Deborah. 2010. “Recovering the LaFleur Doctrine.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 22(2):343–406.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Lauren B. 2016. Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eskridge, William. 2001. “Channeling: Identity-Based Social Movements and Public Law.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150(1):419–525. doi:10.2307/3312920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiddler, Garrett. 2021. SCOTUS Opinions. Accessed July 28, 2021. https://www.kaggle.com/gqfiddler/scotus-opinions.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Katie. 2006. “United States V. Virginia: A Rhetorical Battle Between Progress and Preservation.” Women’s Studies in Communication 29(2):133–64. doi:10.1080/07491409.2006.10162496.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, Linda. 2020. The U.S. Supreme Court: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Allison P., and May Sen. 2019. “Bias and Judging.” Annual Review of Political Science 22(1):241–59. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051617-090650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobi, Tonja, and Dylan Schweers. 2017. “Justice, Interrupted: The Effect of Gender, Ideology, and Seniority at Supreme Court Oral Arguments.” Virginia Law Review 103(7):1379–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalev, Alexandra, and Gal Deutsch. 2018. “Gender Inequality and Workplace Organizations: Understanding Reproduction and Change.” Pp. 257–69 in Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, edited by Barbara Risman, Carissa Froyum, and William Scarborough. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Khodak, M., N. Saunshi, B. Stewart, S. Arora, Y. Liang, and T. Ma. 2018. “A la Carte Embedding: Cheap but Effective Induction of Semantic Feature Vectors.” Pp. 12–22 in ACL 2018 - 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference (Long Papers), January 1, Vol. 1. Melbourne, Australia: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1002.
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, Lily, and Lanier Scott Isom. 2012. Grace and Grit: My Fight for Equal Pay and Fairness at Goodyear and Beyond. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Jennifer. 2021. “Reckoning with Asian America and the New Culture War on Affirmative Action.” Sociological Forum 36(4):863–88. doi:10.1111/socf.12751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, Vicki. 2004. “Supreme Court Narratives on Equality and Gender Discrimination in Employment: 1971–2002.” Cardozo Women’s Law Journal 10:501–75.
   Google Scholar
• Omer Levy, and Yoav Goldberg. 2014 January. “Dependency-Based Word Embeddings.” Pp. 302–08 in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Short Papers), Vol. 2. Baltimore, MD: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Manian, Maya. 2016. “Geduldig v. Aiello.” Pp. 185–90 in Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by K. Stanchi, L. Berger, and B. Crawford. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, Naomi M. 2020. “Supreme Court and Gender Narratives: Commentary on Desert Palace V. Costa.” Pp. 30–43 in Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Employment Discrimination Opinions, edited by Ann McGinley and Nicole Buonocore Porter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mezey, Susan Gluck. 2011. Elusive Equality: Women’s Rights, Public Policy, and the Law. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Neumeister, McKaye L. 2017. “By Any Other Name: The Vocabulary of ‘Feminism’ at the Supreme Court.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 29(1):241–72.
   Google Scholar
• Paetzold, Ramona L., and W. Steven Rholes. 2017. “Wal-Mart V. Dukes: Justice Scalia and Systemic Disparate Treatment Theory.” Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal 21(1):115–62.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, D., and Joseph L. Smith. 2017. “Gender Bias in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts 5(2):337–61. doi:10.1086/692611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014. “GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation.” Pp. 1532–43 in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Doha, Qatar: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Pino, Lisset M. 2018. “Wal-Mart V. Dukes: The Feminist Case Against Individualized Adjudication.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 30(2):401–12.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, Kathryn L. 1979. “The Shifting Parameters of Affirmative Action: ‘Pragmatic’ Paternalism in Sex-Based Employment Discrimination Cases.” Wayne Law Review 26(4):1281–308.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2019. Status: Why Is It Everywhere? Why Does It Matter?. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, Pedro L., Arthur Spirling, and Brandon M. Stewart. 2023. “Embedding Regression: Models for Context-Specific Description and Inference.” American Political Science Review 117(4):1255–74. doi:10.1017/S0003055422001228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saguy, Abigail C., Janet A. Williams, and Mallory Rees. 2020. “Reassessing Gender Neutrality.” Law & Society Review 54(1):7–32. doi:10.1111/lasr.12454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, Williams J., Ray Sin, and Barbara Risman. 2019. “Attitudes and the Stalled Gender Revolution: Egalitarianism Traditionalism, and Ambivalence from 1977 and 2016.” Gender & Society 33(2):173–200. doi:10.1177/0891243218809604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, Stacy R. 2013. “Responding to Counterarguments: Learning from the Swing-Vote Cases.” Legal Communication & Rhetoric 10:201–28.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, Reva. 2006. “Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and the Constitutional Change: The Case of the de Facto ERA.” California Law Review 94(5):1323–420. doi:10.2307/20439068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, Carol. 1989. Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spaeth, Harold J., Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Jeffrey A. Segal, Theodore J. Ruger, and Sara C. Benesh. 2022. Supreme Court Database. Version 2022 Release 01. http://supremecourtdatabase.org.
   Google Scholar
• Stanchi, Kathryn M., Linda L. Berger, and Bridget J. Crawford, eds. 2016. Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szmer, John J., Tammy A. Sarver, and Erin B. Kaheny. 2010. “Have We Come a Long Way, Baby? The Influence of Attorney Gender on Supreme Court Decision Making.” Politics & Gender 6(1):1–36. doi:10.1017/S1743923X09990493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Gillian. 2016. Because of Sex: One Law, Ten Cases, and Fifty Years that Changed American Women’s Lives at Work. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ura, Joseph Daniel, and Alison Higgins Merrill. 2017. “The Supreme Court and Public Opinion.” Pp. 432–59 in The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior, edited by L. Epstein and S. A. Linquist. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Kim. 2007. “Separate Spheres: Analytical Persistence in United States Women’s History.” History Compass 5(1):262–77. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2006.00366.x.
   Google Scholar
• West, Robin, and Cynthia Grant Bowman. 2019. Research Handbook on Feminist Jurisprudence. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wildman, Stephanie., C. A. Forell, and D. M. Matthews. 2000. “Ending Male Privilege: Beyond the Reasonable Woman.” Michigan Law Review 98(6):1797–821. doi:10.2307/1290264.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Joan. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, Alison T., and Shelley J. Correll. 2018. “Combatting Gender Bias in Modern Workplaces.” Pp. 509–21 in Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, edited by B. Risman, C. Froyum, and W. Scarborough. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Publishing,
   Google Scholar