“Force Multipliers” and “Risk Multipliers”: Organizational Myth and Gender Integration of the U.S. Combat Arms Military Occupational Specialties and Units

References

• Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society 4(2): 139–58. doi: 10.1177/089124390004002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, Joan. 1992. “From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions.” Contemporary Sociology 21(5): 565–69. doi: 10.2307/2075528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbeit, Miriam R. 2017. “Make Sure You’re Not Getting Yourself in Trouble”: Building Sexual Relationships and Preventing Sexual Violence at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.” The Journal of Sex Research 54(8): 949–61. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1207055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, James N., Brian S. Mittman, and Andrew E. Newman. 1991. “Targets of Opportunity: Organizational and Environmental Determinants of Gender Integration within the California Civil Service, 1979-1985.” American Journal of Sociology 96(6): 1362–401. doi: 10.1086/229690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbitt-Zeher, Donna. 2011. “Gender Discrimination at Work: Connecting Gender Stereotypes, Institutional Policies, and Gender Composition of Workplace.” Gender & Society 25(6): 764–86. doi: 10.1177/0891243211424741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnes, Stephanie. 2020. “Service-women’s Responses to Sexual Harassment: The Importance of Identity Work and Masculinity in a Gendered Organization.” Violence Against Women 26(12–13): 1656–80. doi: 10.1177/1077801219873433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, Dana M. and Laura Logan. 2008. “Gendered Organizations: Progress and Prospects.” Sociology Compass 2(1): 107–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00071.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, Cindy L. and Erin Leahey. 2014. “Cultural Correlates of Gender Integration in Science.” Gender, Work and Organization 21(6): 516–30. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, Carol. 2000. “‘How Can She Claim Equal Rights When She Doesn’t Have to Do as Many Push-Ups as I Do?’: The Framing of Men’s Opposition to Women’s Equality in the Military.” Men and Masculinities 3(2): 131–51. doi: 10.1177/1097184X00003002001.
   Google Scholar
• Collins-Dogrul, Julie and Jaimis Rebecca Ulrich. 2018. “Fighting Stereotypes: Public Discourse about Women in Combat.” Armed Forces & Society 44(3): 436–59. doi: 10.1177/0095327X17715650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. and James W. Messerschmidt. 2005. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept.” Gender & Society 19(6): 829–59. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, Raewyn. 2006. “Glass Ceilings or Gendered Institutions? Mapping the Gender Regimes of Public Sector Worksites.” Public Administration Review 66(6): 837–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00652.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, Raewyn W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denissen, Amy M. and Abigail C. Saguy. 2014. “Gendered Homophobia and the Contradictions of Workplace Discrimination for Women in the Building Trades.” Gender & Society 28(3): 381–403. doi: 10.1177/0891243213510781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, Dula J. 1992. “Affirmative Action: A Case Study of an Organizational Effort.” Sociological Perspectives 35(1): 119–36. doi: 10.2307/1389371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt, Judson G. and Bradley A. Levinson. 2014. “Inhabited Institutions in New Destinations: Local Sense-making and Institutional Work in Community Response to New Immigration.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 45(2): 115–42. doi: 10.1177/0891241614550757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finfgeld-Connett, Deborah. 2014. “Use of Content Analysis to Conduct Knowledge-building and Theory-generating Qualitative Systematic Reviews.” Qualitative Research 14(3): 341–52. doi: 10.1177/1468794113481790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, Hannah C. 2012. “The Role of Practice in the Development of Military Masculinities.” Gender, Work and Organization 19(6): 699–722. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00542.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, Tim. 2010. “The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School.” American Sociological Review 75(1): 52–74. doi: 10.1177/0003122409357044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardison, Chaitra M., Susan D. Hosek, and Chloe E. Bird. 2018. “Establishing Gender-neutral Physical Standards for Ground Combat Occupations, Volume 1: A Review of Best-practice Methods.” RAND Corporation, California. doi: 10.7249/RR1340.1.
   Google Scholar
• Haveman, Heather A. and Rachel Wetts. 2019. “Contemporary Organizational Theory: The Demographic, Relational, and Cultural Perspectives.” Sociology Compass 13(3): 1–20. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, Ramon. 2010. “Doing Hegemony: Military, Men, and Constructing a Hegemonic Masculinity.” The Journal of Men’s Studies 18(2): 179–94. doi: 10.3149/jms.1802.179.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, Jeanne. 1992. Women in the Military: An Unfinished Revolution. Novato, CA: Presidio.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Kirsten M., Kimberly Curry Hall, Miriam Matthews, Leslie Adrienne Payne, Lisa Saum-Manning, Douglas Yeung, David Schulker, Stefan Zavislan, and Nelson Lim. 2018. Addressing Barriers to Female Officer Retention in the Air Force. California: RAND Corporation. doi: 10.7249/RR2073.
   Google Scholar
• King, Anthony. 2016. “The Female Combat Soldier.” European Journal of International Relations 22(1): 122–43. doi: 10.1177/1354066115581909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, Fiona, Meryl Kenny, and Louise Chappell. 2010. “New Institutionalism through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?” International Political Science Review 31(5): 573–88. doi: 10.1177/0192512110388788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, Jena. 2012. “Military Women in Combat: Why Making It Official Matters.” The Washington Post, 25 May. Retrieved December 18, 2020 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-leadership/post/military-women-in-combat-why-making-it-official-matters/2012/05/25/gJQAOsRvpU_blog.html).
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, Lisa S., Carra S. Sims, Benjamin Saul Batorsky, Adeyemi Theophilus Okunogbe, Brittany L. Bannon, and Craig A. Myatt. 2017. Identifying Promising Approaches to U.S. Army Institutional Change. California: RAND Corporation. doi: 10.7249/RR1588.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–63. doi: 10.1086/226550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Military Leadership Diversity Commission. 2011. From Representation to Inclusion: Diversity Leadership for the 21-st Century Military. Arlington, VA: Office for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, Department of Defense. Retrieved December 12, 2020 (https://diversity.defense.gov/Portals/51/Documents/Special%20Feature/MLDC_Final_Report.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Brenda L. 2020. “Military Women: Changes in Representation and Experiences. ” Pp. 1–22 in Handbook of Military Sciences, edited by Anders Sookermany. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Retrieved July 6, 2021 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02866-4.
   Google Scholar
• Nantais, Cynthia and Martha F. Lee. 1999. “Women in the United States Military: Protectors or Protected? the Case of Prisoner of War Melissa Rathbun-Nealy.” Journal of Gender Studies 8(2): 181–91. doi: 10.1080/095892399102698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. 2012. Report to Congress on the Reviews of Laws, Policies and Regulations Restricting the Service of Female Members in the U.S. Armed Forces. Washington, DC: Department of Defense. Retrieved December 10, 2020 (https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a556468.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Perez, Carolina Criado. 2019. Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. New York, NY: Abrams Press.
   Google Scholar
• Public Law 113-66, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, December 26, 2013. Retrieved July 5, 2021 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/3304/text).
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, Agnes Gereben, Darrell D. Jones, Andrew M. Naber, Thomas Goughnour, and Nelson Lim. 2018. An Assessment of Options for Increasing Gender Integration in Air Force Basic Military Training. California: RAND Corporation. doi: 10.7249/RR1795.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. Richard. 1991. “Unpacking Institutional Arrangements.” Pp. 164–82 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Mady Wechsler. 1995. “Women’s Military Roles Cross-nationally: Past, Present, and Future.” Gender & Society 9(6): 757–75. doi: 10.1177/089124395009006008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Mady Wechsler, David G. Smith, David R. Segal, and Amy A. Canuso. 2016. “The Role of Leadership and Peer Behaviors in the Performance and Well-Being of Women in Combat: Historical Perspectives, Unit Integration, and Family Issues.” Military Medicine 181(1): 28–39. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00342.
   Google Scholar
• Steidl, Christina R. and Aislinn Roxanne Brookshire. 2018. “Just One of the Guys until Shower Time: How Symbolic Embodiment Threatens Women’s Inclusion in the US Military.” Gender, Work & Organization 26(9): 1271–88. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swick, Andrew and Emma Moore. 2018. “The (Mostly) Good News on Women in Combat.” The Center for a New American Security. Retrieved December 12, 2020 (https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/an-update-on-the-status-of-women-in-combat).
   Google Scholar
• Titunik, Regina F. 2000. “The First Wave: Gender Integration and Military Culture.” Armed Forces & Society 26(2): 229–57. doi: 10.1177/0095327X0002600204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wijk, Charles H. and Gillian Finchilescu. 2008. “Symbols of Organisational Culture: Describing and Prescribing Gender Integration of Navy Ships.” Journal of Gender Studies 17(3): 237–49. doi: 10.1080/09589230802204266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar