Evaluation of models for description of wet aggregate size distribution from soils of different land uses

REFERENCES

• Allen T 1997; Particle Size Measurement. Powder Sampling and Particle Size Measurement, Vol. 1. 525 pp. Chapman and Hall, London.
   Google Scholar
• Allison LE, Moodie CD 1965: Carbonate. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, 2nd Ed., Chemical and Mineralogical Properties, Ed. CA Black et al. pp. 1379–1396. American society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Amezketa E 1999: Soil aggregate stability: a review. J. Sustain. Agric., 14, 83–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashagrie Y, Zech W, Guggenberger G, Mamo T 2007: Soil aggregation, and total and particulate organic matter following conversion of native forests to continuous cultivation in Ethiopia. Soil Till. Res., 94, 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldock JA, Kay BD 1987: Influence of cropping history and chemical treatments on the water-stable aggregation of a silt loam soil. Can. J. Soil Sci., 67, 501–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baveye P, Boast CW 1998: Concepts of fractals in soils: Remixing apples and oranges. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 62, 1469–1470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronick CJ, Lal R 2005: Soil structure and management: A review. Geoderma, 124, 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchan GD, Grewal KS, Robson AB 1993: Improved models of particle-size distribution: An illustration of model comparison techniques. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 57, 901–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell GS 1985: Soil physics with BASIC: Transport models for soil-plant systems, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera J, Neuman SP 1986: Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 1.Maximum likelihood incorporating prior information. Water Resour. Res., 22, 199–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso T, Barto EK, Siddiky MRK, Smigelsk J, Rillig MC 2011: Are power laws that estimate fractal dimension a good descriptor of soil structure and its link to soil biological properties?. Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 359–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Hopmans JW, Grismer ME 1999: Parameter estimation of two-fluid capillary pressure-saturation and permeability functions. Adv. Water Resour., 22, 479–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson RE, Sutherland PL 1986: Porosity. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd Ed., Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Ed. A. Klute, pp. 443–460. American society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Zorita M, Perfect E, Grove JH 2002: Disruptive methods for assessing soil structure. Soil Till. Res., 64, 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredlund MD, Fredlund DG, Wilson GW 2000: An equation to represent grain size distribution. Can. Geotech. J., 37, 817–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredlund DG, Xing A 1994: Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve. Can. Geotech. J., 31, 521–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner WR 1956: Representation of soil aggregate size distribution by a logarithmic-normal distribution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 20, 151–153.
   Google Scholar
• Gee GW, Bouder JW 1986: Particle size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd Ed., Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Ed. A. Klute, pp. 825–844. American society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Ghildyal BP, Tripathi RP 1987: Soil Physics, Wileys, Eastern Ltd., New Dehli, India, 656 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Green PE, Caroll JD 1978: Analyzing Multivariate Data, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang SI, Lee KP, Lee DS, Powers SE 2002: Models for estimating soil particle-size distributions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66, 1143–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani RR, Callis CF 1963: Particle Size: Measurement, Interpretation, and Application, 165 pp. Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Islam KR, Weil RR 2000: Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 79, 9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaky J 1944: Soil Mechanics, Egyetemi Nyomda, Budapest (In Hungarian).
   Google Scholar
• John B, Yamashita T, Ludwig B, Flessa H 2005: Storage of organic carbon in aggregate and density fractions of silty soil under different types of land use. Geoderma, 128, 63–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay BD 1990: Rates of change of soil structure under different cropping systems. Adv. Soil Sci., 12, 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kay BD, Angers DA 1999: Soil structure. In Handbook of soil science, Ed. Sumner ME, p. 229–276. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper WD, Rosenau RC 1986: Aggregate stability and size distribution. In Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, 2nd Ed. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Ed. A. Klute, pp. 425–442. American society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Lipiec J, Walczak R, Witkowska-Walczak B, Nosalewicz A, Słowinska-Jurkiewicz A, Sławı´nski C 2007: The effect of aggregate size on water retention and pore structure of two silt loam soils of different genesis. Soil Till. Res., 97, 239–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallows CL 1973: Some comments on Cp. Technometrics, 15, 661–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt WD 1963: An algorithm for the least squares sum of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 11, 431–441.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall TJ, Quirk JP 1950: Stability of structural aggregates of dry soil. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 1, 266–275.
   Google Scholar
• Millan H, González-Posada M, Aguilar M, Domínguez J, Céspedes L 2003: On the fractal scaling of soil data. Particle-size distributions. Geoderma, 117, 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minasny B, McBratney AB, Bristow KL 1999: Comparison of different approaches to the development of pedotransfer functions for water-retention curves. Geoderma, 93, 225–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr HM, Selles F 1995: Seedling emergence as influenced by aggregate size, bulk density, and penetration resistance of the seedbed. Soil Till. Res., 34, 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson DW, Sommers LE 1982: Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, p. 539–579. American society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Perfect E, Blevins RL 1997: Fractal characterization of soil aggregation and fragmentation as influenced by tillage treatment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61, 896–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfect E, Diaz-Zorita M, Grove JH 2002: A prefractal model for predicting soil fragment mass-size distribution. Soil Till. Res., 64, 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirmoradian N, Sepaskhah AR, Hajabbasi A 2005: Application of fractal theory to quantify soil aggregate stability as influenced by tillage treatments. Biosyst. Eng., 90, 227–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuss SA, Buhler DD, Gunsolus JL 2001: Effects of soil depth and aggregate size on weed distribution and viability in a silty loam soil. Appl. Soil Ecol., 16, 209–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider EC, Gupta SC 1985: Corn emergence as influenced by soil temperature, matric potential and aggregate size distribution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 49, 415–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi MA, Boersma L 1984: A unifying quantitative analysis of soil texture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48, 142–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Six J, Paustian K, Elliott ET, Combrink C 2000: Soil structure and organic matter: I. Distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate-associated carbon. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 681–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snedecor GW, Cochran WG 1989: Statistical Methods, Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff 1999: Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, 2nd Ed. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture,Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Turcotte DL 1986: Fractals and fragmentation. J. Geophys. Res., 91, 1921–1926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler SW, Wheatcraft SW 1992: Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions: analysis and limitations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 362–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder RE 1936: A direct method of aggregate analysis of soils and a study of the physical nature of erosion losses. J. Am. Soc. Agron., 28, 337–351.
   Google Scholar
• Young IM, Crawford JW 1991: The fractal structure of soil aggregates: its measurement and interpretation. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 42, 187–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar