Pseudomonas putida improved soil enzyme activity and growth of kasumbha under low input of mineral fertilizers

References

• Ahmed FF, Morsy MH 1999: A new method for measuring leaf area in different fruit species. Mania J. Agric. Develop., 19, 97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Alencar NLM, Innecco R, Gomes-Filho E, Gallão MI, Alvarez-Pizarro JC, Prisco JT, DE Oliveira AB 2012: Seed reserve composition and mobilization during germination and early seedling establishment of Cereus Jamacaru D.C. ssp. Jamacaru (Cactaceae). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Annal. Brazilian Acad. Sci.), 84(3), 823–832. doi:10.1590/S0001-37652012000300024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aseri GK, Jain N, Panwar J, Rao AV, Meghwal PR 2008: Biofertilizers improve plant growth, fruit yield, nutrition, metabolism and rhizosphere enzyme activities of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) in Indian Thar Desert. Scientia Hort., 117, 130–135. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2008.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimi SM, Farnia A, Shaban M, Lak M 2013: Effect of different biofertilizers on seed yield of barley (Hurdeom vulgar L.), Bahman cultivar. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biomed. Res., 1(5), 538–546. http://www.ijabbr.com
   Google Scholar
• Bansal OP, Singh G, Katiyar P 2014: Effect of untreated sewage effluent irrigation on heavy metal content, microbial population and enzymatic activities of soils in Aligarh. J. Environ. Biol., 35(4), 641–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beheraa BC, Yadav H, Singh SK, Sethi BK, Mishra RR, Kumari S, Thatoi H 2017: Paper alkaline phosphatase activity of a phosphate solubilizing Alcaligenes faecalis, isolated from mangrove soil. Biotechnol. Res. Innov., doi:10.1016/j.biori.2017.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhary MAM, Ahmad S 2017: Safflower – a potential industrial crop in Pakistan. Technology Times. https://www.technologytimes.pk/?p=18432
   Google Scholar
• Douglas LA, Bremner JM 1970: Colometric determination of microgram quantities of urea. Anal. Lett., 3, 79–87. doi:10.1080/00032717008067782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianfreda L 2015: Enzymes of importance to rhizosphere processes. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nut., 15(2), 283–306. doi:10.4067/S0718-95162015005000022
   Google Scholar
• Gong X, Wei L, Yu X, Li S, Sun X, Wang X 2017: Effects of rhamnolipid and microbial inoculants on the vermicomposting of green waste with Eisenia fetida. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0170820. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiscox JD, Israelstam GF 1979: A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can. J. Bot., 57, 1332–1334. doi:10.1139/b79-163
   Google Scholar
• Huang W, Liu J, Zhou G, Zhang D, Deng Q 2011: Effects of precipitation on soil acid phosphatase activity in three successional forests in southern China. Biogeosciences, 8, 1901–1910. doi:10.5194/bg-8-1901-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui Z, Weijiong L, Yongzhen N 2004: Bio-organic and inorganic fertilizer on soil microbial activity. Rural Eco-Environ., 20(1), 37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain MI, Asghar HN, Akhtar MJ, Arshad M 2013: Impact of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on growth and yield of maize. Soil Environ., 32(1), 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal A, Hasnain S 2013: Auxin producing Pseudomonas strains: biological candidates to modulate the growth of Triticum aestivum beneficially. Amer. J. Plant Sci., 4, 1693–1700. doi:10.4236/ajps.2013.49206
   Google Scholar
• James GC 1978: Natalic Sherman Rockland Community College, State University of New York, pp. 75–80. The Benjamin/cummins Publishing Co. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Karakurt H, Aslantas R 2010: Effects of some plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains on plant growth and leaf nutrient content of apple. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 18, 101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Krey T, Caus M, Baum C, Ruppel S, Eichler-Löbermann B 2011: Interactive effects of plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria and organic fertilization on P nutrition of Zea mays L. and Brassica napus L. J. Plant Nut. Soil Sci., 174, 602–613. doi:10.1002/jpln.200900349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruczek A 2005: Phosphorus utilization from fertilizer and accumulation of mineral components in the initial stage of maize development. Polish J. Environ. Stud., 14(4), 467–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuan KB, Othman R, Rahim KA, Shamsuddin ZH 2016: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation to enhance vegetative growth, nitrogen fixation and nitrogen remobilisation of maize under greenhouse conditions. PLoS One, 11(3), 1–19. e0152478. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei T, Sun XH, Guo XH, Ma JJ 2017: Quantifying the relative importance of soil moisture, nitrogen, and temperature on the urea hydrolysis rate. Soil Sci. Plant Nut., 63(3), 225–232. doi:10.1080/00380768.2017.1340813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR 1983: Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 11, 591–592. doi:10.1042/bst0110591
   Google Scholar
• Liu KL, Lai CM, Helen W 2002: Soil enzyme activities as indicators of agricultural soil quality. 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Bangkok, Thailand, 14th-20th August, 2002. Symposium No. 32, Paper No. 1386. p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ 1951: Protein measurement with Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Kang BG, Lee YJ, Chung JB, Sa TM 2010: Effect of co-inoculation of methylotrophic Methylobacterium oryzae with Azospirillum brasilense and Burkholderia pyrrocinia on the growth and nutrient uptake of tomato, red pepper and rice. Plant Soil, 328, 71–82. doi:10.1007/s11104-009-0083-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maithani S, Pal M, Maitya A, Pradhan M 2017: Isotope selective activation: a new insight into the catalytic activity of urease. RSC Adv., 7, 31372–31376. doi:10.1039/C7RA05489K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald CE, Chen LL 1965: The lowry modification of the Folin reagent for determination of proteinase activity. Anal. Biochem., 10, 175–177. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(65)90255-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meliani A, Bensoltane A, Benidire L, Oufdou K 2017: Plant growth-promotion and IAA secretion with Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putida. Res Rev. J. Bot. Sci., 6(2), 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nakano Y 2007: Effects of Effective Microorganisms™ on the growth of Brassica rapa. Brigham Young University of Hawaii, USA. http://www.em-la.com/archivos-de-usuario/base_datos/em_growth_brassica_rapa.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Naz I, Bano A 2010: Biochemical, molecular characterization and growth promoting effects of phosphate solubilizing Pseudomonas sp. Isolated from weeds grown in salt range of Pakistan. Plant Soil, 334, 199–207. doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0372-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman MEH, El-Sheekh MM, El-Naggar AH, Gheda SF 2010: Effect of two species of cyanobacteria as biofertilizers on some metabolic activities, growth, and yield of pea plant. Biol. Fertil. Soil., 46, 861–875. doi:10.1007/s00374-010-0491-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao CS, Grover M, Kundu S, Desai S 2017: Soil Enzymes, 3rd ed., pp. 2100–2107. Central Research Institute for Dry land Agriculture, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Hyderabad, India Encyclopedia of Soil Science. doi:10.1081/E-ESS3-120052906,2100–2107
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez H, Fraga R 1999: Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol. Adv., 17, 319–339. doi:10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00014-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satyaprakash M, Nikitha T, Reddi EUB, Sadhana B, Vani SS 2017: Phosphorous and phosphate solubilising bacteria and their role in plant nutrition. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 6(4), 2133–2144. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.251
   Google Scholar
• Schimel JP, Schaeffer 2012: Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil. Front Microbiol. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah HS, Patel CM, Parikh S 2013: Production of invertase from bacteria by using waste jiggery. Microbes, 3, 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Shi ZJ, Lu Y, Xu ZG, Fu SL 2008: Enzyme activities of urban soils under different land use in the Shenzhen city, China. Plant Soil Environ., 54(8), 341–346. doi:10.17221/415-PSE
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel RGD, Torrie GH 1980: Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd ed., pp. 172–177. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM 1969: Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1, 301–307. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Xiao F, He T, Wang S 2013: Responses of labile soil organic carbon and enzyme activity in mineral soils to forest conversion in the subtropics. Annal. Forest Sci., 70(6), 579–587. doi:10.1007/s13595-013-0294-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe FS, Olsen SR 1965: Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc., 29, 677–678. doi:10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900060025x
   Google Scholar
• Wellburn AR 1994: The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J. Plant Physiol., 144, 307–313. doi:10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou LK, Zhang ZM 1980: Measurements of soil enzyme. Chin. J. Soil Sci., 5, 37–38.
   Google Scholar