The Futures of American Literature

REFERENCES

• Aubry, Timoth. 2011. Reading as therapy: What contemporary fiction does for middle-class Americans. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birkerts, Sven. 2006. The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall, Peter. 2013. Twenty-first-century fiction: A critical introduction. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Neil Edward & Josh Toth (eds.). 2007. The mourning after: Attending the wake of postmodernism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Coover, Robert. 1992. The end of books. New York Times Book Review 21(6), 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Coover, Robert. 2011. A history of the future of narrative. In Leonard Cassuto, Clare Virginia Eby, & Benjamin Reiss (eds.), The Cambridge history of the American novel, 1168–1181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, Valentine. 2002. Reading after theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Darnton, Robert. 2009. The case for books: Past, present, and future. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, Thomas. 1996. After theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton, Terry. 2003. After theory. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, Jeff. 2008. Print is dead: Books in our digital age. New York: Macmillan. .
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Richard. 2011.After the fall: American literature since 9/11. Malden, MA:
   Google Scholar
• John Wiley & Sons.Harbach, Chad. (ed.). 2014. MFA vs. NYC: The two cultures of American fiction. London: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. Katherine. 2002. Writing machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. Katherine. 2005. My mother was a computer: Digital subjects and literary texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. Katherine. 2008. Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Houser, Heather. 2014. Ecosickness in contemporary US fiction: Environment and affect. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hungerford, Amy. 2008. On the period formerly known as contemporary. American Literary History 20(1–2), 410–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungerford, Amy. 2012. McSweeney’s and the school of life. Contemporary Literature 53(4), 646–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irr, Caren. 2013. Toward the geopolitical novel: US fiction in the twenty-first century. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, Alan. 2009. Digimodernism: How new technologies dismantle the postmodern and reconfigure our culture. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, Adam. 2008. Nobel gas. Slate, 9 October. http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2008/10/nobel_gas.html. (last accessed on 5 February 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Levander, Caroline F. 2013. Where is American literature. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Sinclair. 1930. The American fear of literature. 12 December. Speech. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1930/lewis-lecture.html (last accessed on 16 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• McGurl, Mark. 2009. The program era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGurl, Mark. 2011. The new cultural geology. Twentieth Century Literature 57(3–4), 380–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHale, Brian. 2007. What was postmodernism? Electronic Book Review, 20. http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/fictionspresent/tense (last accessed on 19 October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Moraru, Christian. 2011. Cosmodernism: American narrative, late globalization, and the new cultural imaginary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nealon, Jeffrey. 2012. Post-postmodernism: Or, the cultural logic of just-in-time capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, Dale. 2004. Hatchet jobs: Writings on contemporary fiction. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, Andrew. 2012. Book was there: Reading in electronic times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pullinger, Kate & Chris Joseph. 2005 (continuing). Inanimate Alice. http://www.inanimatealice.com/ (last accessed 2 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Saldívar, Ramón. 2011. Historical fantasy, speculative realism, and postrace aesthetics in contemporary American fiction. American Literary History 23(3), 574–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, Aislin. 2008. Nobel literature prize judge: American authors “insular and ignorant”. Daily Telegraph online, 2 October. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/3120602/Nobel-literature-prize-judge-American-authors-insular-and-ignorant.html. (last accessed on 7 February 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Terry. 2006. Contemporary art and contemporaneity. Critical Inquiry 32(4), 681–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Zadie. 2008. Two paths for the novel. New York Review of Books. 20 November.
   Google Scholar
• Svedjedal, Johan. 2001. Den sista boken. Stockholm: Wahlström och Widstrand.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, James. 2004. Hysterical realism. In James Wood, The irresponsible self: On laughter and the novel, 178–194. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar