Linguistic DNA: Investigating Conceptual Change in Early Modern English Discourse

References

• Aarts, Bas, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds.). 2013. The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, Kathryn & Justyna A. Robinson (eds.). 2012. Current methods in historical semantics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bowie, Jill, Sean Wallis & Bas Aarts. 2013. The perfect in spoken British English. In Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech and Sean Wallis (eds.), 318–352.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, F. and A. Pettegree (eds.). 2016. Lost books. Amsterdam: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, Philip R. 2013. MorphAdorner v2: A Java library for the morphological adornment of English language texts. Evanston, IL. Northwestern University. https://morphadorner.northwestern.edu/morphadorner/download/morphadorner.pdf. (last accessed on 29 November 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Calzolari, Nicoletta, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odjik, Stelios Piperidis & Daniel Tapias (eds.). 2008. Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation. Marrakech: European Language Resources Association.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Vyvyan. 2009. How words mean: Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Vyvyan. 2015. A unified account of polysemy within LCCM Theory. Lingua 157, 100–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fano, Robert M. 1961. Transmission of information: A statistical theory of communications. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2016. Semantic and pragmatic change. In Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds.), 256–270.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice, Susan & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.). 2007. Methods in historical pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gadd, Ian. 2009. The use and misuse of Early English Books Online. Literature Compass 6, 680–692. doi:10.1111/j.1741–4113.2009.00632.x
   Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, Dirk. 1997. Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Peter Bakema. 1994. The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, Dirk, Caroline Gevaert & Dirk Speelman. 2012. How anger rose: Hypothesis testing in diachronic semantics. In Kathryn Allan and Justyna A. Robinson (eds.), 109–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hampsher-Monk, Iain, Karen Tilmans & Frank Van Vree (eds.). 1998. History of concepts: Comparative perspectives. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heylen, Kris, Yves Peirsman, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman. 2008. Modelling word similarity: An evaluation of automatic synonymy extraction algorithms. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odjik, Stelios Piperidis & Daniel Tapias (eds.), 3243–3249.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, I.C. 2014. Englishing the Bible in early modern Europe: The case of Ruth. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Jucker, Andreas H., & Irma Taavitsainen. 2013. English Historical Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, Christian, Jane Roberts, Michael Samuels, Irené Wotherspoon & Marc Alexander (eds.). 2016. The historical thesaurus of English, version 4.2. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. http://historicalthesaurus.arts.gla.ac.uk (last accessed on 27 January 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Kichuk, Diana. 2007. Metamorphosis: Remediation in Early English Books Online (EEBO). Literary and Linguistic Computing 22(3),291–303. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqm018
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, Reinhart. 1998. Social history and Begriffgeschichte. In Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karen Tilmans and Frank Van Vree (eds.), 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kytö, Merja & Päivi Pahta (eds.). 2016. The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Adrienne. 1992. Names and naming. Why we need fields and frames. In Adrienne Lehrer & Eva F. Kittay (eds.), 123–142.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Adrienne & Eva F. Kittay (eds.). 1992. Frames, fields and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lenker, U. 2007. Soþlice, forsooth, truly – communicative principles and invited inferences in the history of truth-intensifying adverbs in English. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), 81–106.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Christopher & Hinrich Schütze. 2001. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. 1972. Politics, language and time: Essays on political thought and history. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. 1999–2015. Barbarism and religion. 6 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Roy. 2001. Enlightenment: Britain and the creation of the modern world. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Jane & Christian Kay, with Lynne Grundy. 1995. A thesaurus of Old English. King’s College London Medieval Studies XI. http://oldenglishthesaurus.arts.gla.ac.uk (last accessed on 27 January 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Michael. 1972. Linguistic evolution, with special reference to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schama, Simon. 2001. A history of Britain, volume 2: The British wars, 1603–1776. London: BBC Worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• Sheskin, David. 2004. Handbook of parametric and non-parametric statistical procedures. 3rd edn. Boca Raton: Chapman Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. 1978. The foundations of modern political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Jeremy J. 1996. An historical study of English: Function, form and change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taavitsainen, Irma & Susan Fitzmaurice. 2007. Historical pragmatics: What it is and how to do it. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), 11–36.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Suzie. 1972. Enthusiasm. A study in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, Peter D. & Patrick Pantel. 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37, 141–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, S.A. & J. Bowie. 2012. That vexed problem of choice. London: Survey of English Usage. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/staff/sean/resources/vexedchoice.pdf ( last accessed on 20 January 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, Anna. 2010. Experience, evidence, and sense: The hidden cultural legacy of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Raymond. 1983. Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar