Shall Sweet Bianca Practise How to Bride It? The Role of Dummy Object It in the Diachronic Transitivity Change of Denominal Conversion Verbs

References

• Adams, Valerie. 1973. An introduction to modern English word-formation. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Balteiro, Isabel. 2007a. The directionality of conversion in English: A dia-synchronic study (Linguistic Insights: Studies in Language and Communication 59). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Balteiro, Isabel. 2007b. A contribution to the study of conversion in English. New York: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Biese, Y. M. 1941. Origin and development of conversions in English (Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ 45.2). Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
   Google Scholar
• Bladin, Vilhelm. 1911. Studies on denominative verbs in English. Uppsala: Boktrvckeri.
   Google Scholar
• Bram, Barli. 2011. Major total conversion in English: The question of directionality. Ph.D. dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Eve V. & Herbert H. Clark. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55(4),767–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, Ceri. 2004. A corpus-based investigation of noun to verb conversion in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Liverpool.
   Google Scholar
• Gardelle, Laure. 2011. Whoop her up, hit it, go it alone: The role of the personal pronoun in the fossilization process. In Harald Burger, Jean-Pierre Colson, Jarmo Korhonen & Annette Sabban (eds.), Yearbook of phraseology 2, 163–178. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfurcht, Carolyn A. 2008. Denominal verb formation in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2),251–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A modern English grammar on historical principles, part 6: Morphology. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kastovsky, Dieter (ed.). 1974. Studies in syntax and word-formation: Selected articles by Hans Marchand on the occasion of his 65th birthday on October 1st, 1972 (International Library of General Linguistics 18). München: Wilhelm Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Kruisinga, E. 1932. A handbook of Present-day English, 5th ed., part II: English accidence and syntax 2. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of Present-day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach. 2nd, completely rev. and enl. edn (Handbücher für das Studium der Anglistik). München: C. H. Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Miura, Ayumi. 2018. One hour hath orphan’d me, and widow’d me: A syntactic and semantic history of English verbs converted from human nouns. English Studies 99(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondorf, Britta. 2016. ‘Snake legs it to freedom’: Dummy it as pseudo-object. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(1),73–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagano, Akiko. 2008. Conversion and back-formation in English: Toward a theory of morpheme-based morphology. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
   Google Scholar
• OED = OED Online. http://www.oed.com ( last accessed in March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological productivity: Structural constraints in English derivation (Topics in English Linguistics 28). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rimell, Laura D. 2012. Nominal roots as event predicates in English denominal conversion verbs. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, volume III: 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, F. Th. 1963. An historical syntax of the English language, part 1: Syntactical units with one verb. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Zandvoort, R. W. 1972. A handbook of English grammar, 6th ed. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar