From space to time and beyond: A corpus inquiry into the grammaticalization patterns of a/one step away from

References

• Barcelona, Antonio. 2000. On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective, 31–58. Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bisang, Walter & Björn Wiemer. 2004. What makes grammaticalization? An appraisal of its components and its fringes. In Bisang et al. (eds.), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bisang, Walter, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.). 2004. What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components. Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brems, Lieselotte. 2007. The grammaticalization of small size nouns: Reconsidering frequency and analogy. Journal of English Linguistics 35(4), 293–324.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, Laurel J. & Tohru Inoue. 2020. A far from simple matter revisited: The ongoing grammaticalization of far from. In Merja Kytö & Erik Smitterberg (eds.), Late Modern English: Novel encounters, 271–293. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budts, Sara & Peter Petré. 2016. Reading the intentions of be going to: On the subjectification of future markers. Folia Linguistica 37(1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan. 2003. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, 145–167. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan & William Pagliuca. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical semantics and historical word- formation, 59–83. Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• COCA = Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/ (accessed on October 26, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• COHA = Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English. https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/ (accessed on October 11, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3), 546–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortescue, Michael. 2010. Similitude: A conceptual category. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42(2), 117–142.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, Bernd. 1994. On the genesis of aspect in African Languages: The proximative. In Kevin E. Moore, David A. Peterson & Comfort Wentum (eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special session on historical issues in African linguistics, 35–46. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Bisang et al. (eds.), 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1, 17–35. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1965. The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogenes 51, 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science 4, 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 57–139. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Kevin E. 2014. The spatial language of time: Metaphor, metonymy, and frames of reference. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, Carita. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of DEGREE. English Language and Linguistics 12(2), 317–343.
   Google Scholar
• Petré, Peter, Kristin Davidse & Tinne Van Rompaey. 2012. On ways of being on the way: Lexical, complex preposition and aspect marker uses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(2), 229–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetser, Eve. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Hellen Singmaster (eds.), Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 389–405. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1), 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2008. Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Regine Eckhart, Gerhard Jäger & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Variation, selection, development: Probing the evolutionary model of language change, 219–250. Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2011. Grammaticalization and mechanisms of change. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 19–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar