Christian theurgy and divine indwelling

Bibliography

• The Holy Bible: New Revised Standard Edition, Catholic Edition, Anglicized. Nashville, TN: Catholic Bible Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Opera Omnia of St. Thomas Aquinas. Lander, WY: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012. https://aquinas.cc/.
   Google Scholar
• Addey, C. “The Role of Divine Providence, Will and Love in Iamblichus’ Theory of Theurgic Prayer and Religious Invocation.” In Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism, edited by Eugene Afonasin, John Dillon, and John F. Finamore, 133–150. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Addey, C. Divination and Theurgy in Neoplatonism: Oracles of the Gods. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, E. “Thomas Aquinas: The ‘Aufhebung’ of Radical Aristotelian Ontology into a Pseudodionysian-Proclean Ontology of ‘Esse’.” In Chap. 6 in Aristotelian Aporetic Ontology in Islamic and Christian Thinkers, 205–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, D. Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, D. “Proclus and the Theurgic Liturgy of Pseudo-Dionysius.” Dionysius 22 (2004): 111–132. https://ojs.library.dal.ca/dionysius/article/view/dio22burns.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, E. P. Essays on the Metaphysics of Polytheism in Proclus. New York: Phaidra Editions, 2014. https://henadology.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/essays-proclus.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Butorac, D. D., and D. A. Layne. eds. Proclus and his Legacy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Chlup, R. Proclus: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, A. Participation in God: A Study in Christian Doctrine and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• de Andia, Y. “Dionysius as Mystic.” Translated by Mark Edwards. In The Oxford Handbook of Dionysius the Areopagite, edited by Mark Edwards, Dimitrios Pallis, and Georgios Steiris, 653–669. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. “The Platonic Philosopher at Prayer.” In Platonic Theories of Prayer, edited by John Dillon, and Andrei Timotin, 7–25. Leiden: Brill, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Doolan, G. T. “Aquinas on Esse Subsistens and the Third Mode of Participation.” The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review 82, no. 4 (2018): 611–642. doi:10.1353/tho.2018.0036.
   Google Scholar
• Finamore, J. F. “Iamblichus, Theurgy, and the Soul’s Ascent.” In Philosophy and Salvation in Greek Religion, edited by Vishwa Adluri, 343–355. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gersh, S. From Iamblichus to Erieugena: An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Iamblichus. De Mysteriis. Greek and English. Introduction and Translation by Emma C. Clarke, John M. Dillon, and Jackson P. Hershbell. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kringlebotten, K. Liturgy, Theurgy, and Active Participation: On Theurgic Participation in God. PhD Diss., Durham University, 2021. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/14132/.
   Google Scholar
• Lewy, H. Chaldaean Oracles and Theurgy: Mysticism Magic and Platonism in the Later Roman Empire. Paris: Institut d’Etudes Augustiniennes, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, G. “Theurgy and Forms of Worship in Neoplatonism.” In Religion, Science, and Magic: In Concert and In Conflict, edited by Jacob Neusner, Ernest S. Frerichs, and Paul Virgil McCracken Flesher, 185–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Majercik, R. The Chaldean Oracles: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Leiden: Brill, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Novum Testamentum Graece (Nestle-Aland). 28th edition., edited by Barbara Aland et al, in Cooperation with the Institute for New Testament Textual Research, Münster/Westphalia. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, F. Pseudo-Dionysius and the Metaphysics of Aquinas. New ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pallis, D. “Dionysius the Areopagite.” In Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion, edited by David A. Leeming, 650–654. Berlin: Springer, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Perl, E. “Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. 2, edited by Lloyd P. Gerson, 767–787. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. Parmenides. Translation by Harold North Fowler. In Loeb Classical Library, ed. Jeffrey Henderson, volume 167. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. Republic. Translation by Chris Emlyn-Jones and William Preddy. In Loeb Classical Library, ed. Jeffrey Henderson, volumes 237, 276. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. Theaetetus. Translation by Harold North Fowler. In Loeb Classical Library, ed. Jeffrey Henderson, volume 123. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1921.
   Google Scholar
• Proclus. Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides. Translation by Glenn R. Morrow and John M. Dillon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Proclus. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. 6 vols., translated and edited by Dirk Baltzly, David T. Runia, Michael Share, and Harold Tarrant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007–2017.
   Google Scholar
• Proclus. The Elements of Theology. 2nd ed. Greek and English. Edited, translated, introduced, and commented by E. R. Dodds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963. Reprint, Oxford: Clarendon, 1971. Page References are to the 1971 edition.
   Google Scholar
• Pseudo-Dionysius. In The Works of Dionysius the Areopagite. 2 vols, Translation by John Parker. London: James Parker, 1897, 1899.
   Google Scholar
• Pseudo-Dionysius. In Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works, Translation by Colm Luibheid, and Paul Rorem. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Pseudo-Dionysius. In Corpus Dionysiacum I, edited by Beate Regina Suchla. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Pseudo-Dionysius. In Corpus Dionysiacum II, 2nd ed., edited by Günter Heil, and Adolf Martin Ritter. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, N. The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Saffrey, H.-D. “New Objective Links Between the Pseudo-Dionysius and Proclus.” In Neoplatonism and Christian Thought, edited by Dominic J. O’Meara, 64–74, 246–248. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Sammon, B. T. “Redeeming Chenu? A Reconsideration of the Neoplatonic Influence on Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae.” The Heythrop Journal 62, no. 6 (2021): 971–987. doi:10.1111/heyj.12664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, G. “Theurgy: Rituals of Unification in the Neoplatonism of Iamblichus.” Traditio 41 (1985): 1–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27831164.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, G. “Neoplatonic Theurgy and Dionysius the Areopagite.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 7, no. 4 (1999): 573–599. doi:10.1353/earl.1999.0093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, G. Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus. 2nd ed. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press/Sophia Perennis, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Spanu, N. Proclus and the Chaldean Oracles: A Study on Proclean Exegesis, with a Translation and Commentary of Proclus’ Treatise On Chaldean Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Stang, C. M. “From the Chaldean Oracles to the Corpus Dionysiacum: Theurgy Between the Third and Sixth Centuries.” Journal for Late Antique Religion and Culture 5 (2011): 1–13. doi:10.18573/j.2011.10307.
   Google Scholar
• Stang, C. M. Apophasis and Pseudonymity in Dionysius the Areopagite: “no Longer I”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/apophasis-and-pseudonymity-in-dionysius-the-areopagite-9780199640423.
   Google Scholar
• Stang, C. M. “Dionysius, Iamblichus, and Proclus.” In The Oxford Handbook of Dionysius the Areopagite, edited by Mark Edwards, Dimitrios Pallis, and Georgios Steiris, 122–135. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, C. “Proclus.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. 2, edited by Lloyd P. Gerson, 630–653. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Stępień, T. “The Understanding of Symbols and Their Role in the Ascent of the Soul to God in Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite and Nicholas of Cusa.” Roczniki Filozoficzne 63 (2015): 85–103. doi:10.18290/rf.2015.63.2-7.
   Google Scholar
• Struck, P. T. “Pagan and Christian Theurgies: Iamblichus, Pseudo-Dionysius, Religion and Magic in Late Antiquity.” Ancient World 32, no. 2 (2001): 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaseanu-Döbler, I. Theurgy in Late Antiquity: The Invention of a Ritual Tradition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• te Velde, R. A. “Participation: Aquinas and His Neoplatonic Sources.” In Christian Platonism: A History, edited by Alexander J. B. Hampton, and John Peter Kenney, 122–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• V. Afonasin, E., J. M. Dillon, and J. Finamore. eds. Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism. Leiden: Brill, 2012. doi:10.1163/9789004230118.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, R. M. Proclus’ Hymns: Essays, Translations, Commentary. Leiden: Brill, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Wear, S. K., and J. Dillon. Dionysius the Areopagite and the Neoplatonist Tradition: Despoiling the Hellenes. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.
   Google Scholar