Aesthetic Sensitivity, Previous Art Experiences, and Participation in the Scholastic Art Awards

References

• Albert R. Chandler. “Experimental Aesthetics, A Bibliography of Experimental Aesthetics, 1865-1932,” Ohio State University Bureau of Educational Research Mimeographs. Vol. 1, 1933, pp. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin L. Child. “Development of Sensitivity to Esthetic Value,” Cooperative Research Project No. 1748. New Haven: Yale University, 1964. “Observations on the Measure of Some Measures of Esthetic Sensitivity,” Journal of Psychology, Vol. 57, January, 1965, pp. 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• “Personal Preference as an Expression of Esthetic Sensitivity,” Journal of Personality, Vol. 30, September, 1962, pp. 496–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Personality Correlates of Esthetic Sensitivity,” Journal of Personality, Vol. 33, September, 1965, pp. 476–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaret Bulley. Art and Everyman. London: B. T. Batsford, 2 volumes, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• “An Inquiry as to Aesthetic Judgments of Children,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 4, June, 1934, pp. 162–182. Cyril Burt. How The Mind Works. London: Allen and Unwin, 1933. Judith Cattell, Josephine Glasock, and M. Washburn. “Experiments on a Possible Test of Aesthetic Judgment of Pictures,” American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 29, July, 1918, pp. 333–336.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur C. Eurich and Herbert Carroll. “Group Differences in Art Judgment,” School and Society, Vol. 34, August, 1931, pp. 204–206.
   Google Scholar
• Olaf Johnson and Robert Knapp. “Sex Differences and Aesthetic Preferences,” Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 61, December, 1961, pp. 279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Littlejohns and Arthur Needham. Training of Taste in the Arts and Crafts. London: Pitman and Sons, 1933.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolf Pintner. “Aesthetic Appreciation of Pictures by Children,” Pedagogical Seminary, Vol. 25, June, 1918, pp. 216–218.
   Google Scholar
• Harry O. Barrett. “An Examination of Certain Standardized Art Tests to Determine Their Relationship to Classroom Achievement and to Intelligence,” Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 42, January, 1949, pp. 398–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles W. Crannel. “The Validity of Certain Measures of Art Appreciation in Relation to a Drawing Task,” Journal of Psychology, Vol. 35, January, 1953, pp. 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heather Dewar. “A Comparison of Tests of Artistic Appreciation,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 8, February, 1938, pp. 29–49. Hildegard Dreps. “The Psycho-physical Capacities and Abilities of College Art Students of High and Low Standing,” Psychological Monographs, Vol. 45, 1933, pp. 134–145.
   Google Scholar
• Mah Pervin Anwar. “A Comparative Study of Esthetic Sensitivity and Esthetic Color Organization in Painting,” (unpublished doctoral thesis, Indiana University, 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Harold J. McWhinnie. “Effects of a Learning Experience on the Preference for Complexity and Asymmetry,” Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 35, Fall, 1966, pp. 6–62.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin L. Child. “Observations on the Measure of Some Measures of Esthetic Sensitivity,” Journal of Psychology, Vol. 57, January, 1965, pp. 49–64. “Personal Preferences as an Expression of Esthetic Sensitivity,” Journal of Personality, Vol. 30, September, 1962, pp. 496–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• For a more detailed discussion see Frances E. Anderson. “Aesthetic Sensitivity, Previous Art Experience and Production of Outstanding Works of Art,” (unpublished doctoral thesis, Indiana University, September, 1968).
   Google Scholar
• It should be noted that all work selected for exhibition received a certificate of merit.
   Google Scholar
• op. cit., Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• To determine the socioeconomic status of each student, parents' occupations were rated from one to six using the revised occupational rating scale from W. L. Warner, M. Meeker, and K. Fells' Index of Status Characteristics. See: Delbert Miller Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement. New York: David McKay, 1964, pp. 100–105.
   Google Scholar
• op. cit., Anderson.
   Google Scholar