“Mr. Jewel as a Model:” An Educational Criticism of a High School Art History ClassFootnote¹

1 University of Maryland and National Gallery of Art. Report on the summer institute in art history for high school teachers. College Park, Maryland: Art Department, University of Maryland, 1973.

References

• Alexander, R. R. Educational criticism of three art history classes (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978, 38, 5195A, 78–2125.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, J. The university teacher as artist. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. Social learning theory through imitation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 10). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, M. Curriculum in art education. Seminar in art education for research and curriculum. Pennsylvania State University, September, 1965. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 010-000).
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. The process of education. New York: Vintage Books, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, F. G. Teaching and studying art history: Some anthropological and sociological considerations. Studies in Art Education, 1978, 20(1), 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Day, M. D. The compatibility of art history and studio art activity in the junior high art program. Studies in Art Education, 1969, 10(2), 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Day, M. D. Teaching for art appreciation: A study of instruction on high school students' art preferences and art judgments. (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1973.) Dissertation Abstracts International, 1973, 34, 3017A, 73–30499.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, A. Pilgrim at Tinker's Creek. New York: Bantam Books, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, D. W. Improving the teaching of art appreciation, research and development team for improvement of teaching art appreciation in the secondary schools. Ohio State University, 1966. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 011-063)
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (Ed.) Confronting curriculum reform. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. Qualitative intelligence and the act of teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 1963, 63, 299–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. Toward a more adequate conception of evaluation in the arts. Art Education, 1974, 27, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. Educational connoisseurship and educational criticism: Their forms and functions in educational evaluation. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 1976, 10, 135–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: MacMillan and Company, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Elsen, A. C. The purposes of art (3rd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Filstead, W. J. (Ed.). Qualitative methodology: First-hand involvement with the social world. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, W. D. The criticism of teaching (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1974). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1974, 34, 7604A. (University Microfilms No. 74-13632)
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. J. The museum and the art teacher. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University and the National Gallery of Art, 1966. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 010-443)
   Google Scholar
• Highet, G. The art of teaching. New York: Vintage Books, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. J. Introducing art history: A guide for teachers. Toronto, Canada: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, G. M. The disclosure of classroom life (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976, 37, 2604A. (University Microfilms No. DAH 76-26037)
   Google Scholar
• Means, V. et al. The interactive effects of consonant and dissonant teacher expectancy and feedback communication on student performance in a natural school setting. American Educational Research Journal, 1979, 16, 367–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Art Education Association Taskforce. Art education: Senior high school. Chairman Angela G. Paterakis. Washington, D.C.: National Art Education Association, 1972. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 013-317)
   Google Scholar
• Oregon. Elementary art education: A handbook for Oregon teachers. Salem, Or.: 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, J. A developmental conference to establish guidelines for pilot programs for teaching the concepts of art appreciation which are basic to the general education of all public school students. Final Report, Ohio State University, 1967. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 018-528)
   Google Scholar
• Pelto, P. J., & Pelto, G. H. Anthropological research: The structure of inquiry (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. L., & McCall, G. J. (Eds.), Issues in participant observation. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. C. To do and not to see: The teacher of art. In E. W. Eisner and D. W. Ecker (Eds.), Readings in art education. Waltham, Mass.: Blaisdell Publishing Company, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, E. J. Aesthetic criticism and curriculum description. (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1975). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1975, 36, 5795A, University Microfilms No. DAH 76-05820)
   Google Scholar