The Influence of Age on Preferences for Subject Matter, Realism, and Spatial Depth in Painting Reproductions

References

• Acuff, B. C., & Sieber-Suppes, J. A manual for coding descriptions, interpretations, and evaluations of visual art forms (Research and development Memorandum No. 95, Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching). Stanford: School of Education, Stanford University, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, F. E. Aesthetic sensitivity, previous art experience, and participation in the scholastic art awards. Studies in Art Education, 1969, 20(3), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D., DeWitt, F., Golden, B., & Schpoont, S. Prestige suggestions in children's art preferences. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1956, 89, 85–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benson, C., & Yonas, A. Development of sensitivity to static pictorial depth information. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 361–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, I. L. Personality correlates of esthetic judgment in college students. Journal of Personality, 1965, 33, 476–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. A developmental study of aesthetic preferences for realistic and nonobjective paintings (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 1968). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1969, 29, 4828-B. (University Microfilms No. 69-08869)
   Google Scholar
• Cranston, J. P. The nature and development of aesthetic appreciation in children. British Psychological Society Quarterly Bulletin, 1952, 3(15), 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Endler, N. S. Estimating variance components from mean squares for random and mixed effects analysis of variance models. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1966, 22, 559–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J. E. Children's preferences for pictures of varied complexity of pictorial pattern. Elementary School Journal, 1952, 53, 90–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. The development of sensitivity to figural and stylistic aspects of paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 1972, 63, 605–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., & Gardner, J. Developmental trends in sensitivity to form and subject matter in paintings. Studies in Art Education, 1973, 14(2), 52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, G. P., & Zedeck, S. Judgment analysis for assessing paintings. Journal of Experimental Education, 1973, 41, 26–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahoda, G., & McGurk, H. Pictorial depth perception: A developmental study. British Journal of Psychology, 1974, 65, 141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E. Children's preferences for traditional and modern paintings. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1944.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, P. Multidimensional scaling of children's preferences in paintings (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers State University, 1969). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1969, 30, 1434-A. (University Microfilms No. 69-16493)
   Google Scholar
• Lark-Horovitz, B. On art appreciation of children: I. Preference of picture subjects in general. Journal of Educational Research, 1937, 31, 118–137.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, H. P. Spatial representation in drawing as a correlate of development and a basis for picture preference. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1963, 102, 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machotka, P. The development of aesthetic criteria in childhood: A cross cultural study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Machotka, P. Aesthetic criteria in childhood: Justifications of preference. Child Development, 1966, 37, 877–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWhinnie, H. J. A review of recent literature in perceptual/cognitive style with implications for theory and research in art education. Studies in Art Education, 1970, 11(3), 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. M., and McDonald, G. A. Lateral organization, perceived depth, and title preference in pictures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 33, 983–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, C. Y. A study of the development of children's ability to perceive depth in static two-dimensional pictures (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1968). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1969, 29, 3470-B. (University Microfilms No. 69-4793).
   Google Scholar
• Roubertoux, P., Carlier, M., & Chaguibott, J. Preference for non-objective art: Personal and psychosocial determiners. British Journal of Psychology, 1971, 62, 105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rump, E. E., & Southgate, V. Variables affecting aesthetic appreciation in relation to age. British Journal of Psychology, 1967, 37, 58–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkind, L., & Salkind, N. A measure of aesthetic preference. Studies in Art Education, 1973, 25(1), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Walk, R. D., Karusaitis, K., Lebowitz, C., & Falbo, T. Artistic style as concept formation for children and adults. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1971, 17, 347–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whimbey, A., Vaughan, G. M., & Tatsuoka, M. M. Fixed effects vs. random effects: Estimating variance components from mean squares. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 25, 668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar