Publication Cover
Studies in Art Education
A Journal of Issues and Research
Volume 24, 1983 - Issue 3
2
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pages 169-176 | Published online: 28 Dec 2015

References

  • Alexander, R. Mr. Jewel as a model: An educational criticism of a high school art history class. Studies in Art Education, 1980, 21 (3), 20–30.
  • Anderson, F. The arts and the elderly: An assessment of interest and attitudes. Studies in Art Education, 1976, 18(1), 61–71.
  • Beittel, K., Mattil, E., Burgart, H., Burkhart, R., Kincaid, C., & Stewart, R. The effect of a “depth” vs. a “breadth” method of art instruction at the ninth grade level. Studies in Art Education, 1961, 3 (3), 75–87.
  • Burkhart, R. Progress in art as self-reflective learning for the student. Western Arts Bulletin, 1962, 46.
  • Chapman, L. Research means “searching again.” Art Education, 1979, 32 (4), 6–10.
  • Day, M. Effects of instruction on high school students' art preferences and art judgments. Studies in Art Education, 1976, 16 (1), 25–39.
  • Davis, D. The effects of depth and breadth methods of art instruction upon creative thinking, art attitudes, and aesthetic quality of art products in beginning college art students. Studies in Art Education, 1969, 10 (2), 27–40.
  • Dewey, J. The sources of a science of education. New York: Liveright Publishing Corp., 1929.
  • DiBlasio, M. Child art: A troublesome concept, in R. Norris (Ed.), Essays of philosophy in art education. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1980.
  • Efland, A. The school art style: A functional analysis. Studies in Art Education, 1976, 17 (2), 37–44.
  • Eisner, E. W. A typology of creative behavior in the visual arts. In E. W. Eisner and D. Ecker (Eds.), Readings in art education. Waltham, Mass.: Blaisdell, 1966.
  • Eisner, E. W. The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: MacMillan, 1979.
  • Gardner, H. Unfolding or teaching: On the optimal approach to art education. In E. W. Eisner, (Ed.), The arts, human development, and education. Berkeley: McCutchan, 1976.
  • Gardner, H., Winner, E., & Kircher, M. Children's conceptions of the arts. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 1975, 9 (3), 60–77.
  • Kaufman, I. Some reflections on research in art education. Studies in Art Education, 1959, 1 (1), 9–18.
  • Pariser, D. Two methods of teaching drawing skills. Studies in Art Education, 1979, 20 (3), 30–42.
  • Rush, J. C., Weckesser, J., & Sabers, D. A comparison of instructional methods for teaching contour drawing to children. Studies in Art Education, 1980, 21 (2), 6–12.
  • Rush, J. C., & Lovano-Kerr, J. Research for the classroom: An ecological impact statement. Art Education, 1982, 35 (2), 11–19.
  • Travers, M. W. (Ed.). Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
  • Walberg, H., Schiller, D., & Haertel, G. The quiet revolution in educational research. Phi Delta Kappan, 1979, 61 (3), 179–183.
  • Whitesel, L. Personalities of women art students. Studies in Art Education, 1978, 20 (1), 56–63.
  • Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. A road retraveled. Studies in Art Education, 1980, 22 (1), 63–64.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.