Judging Children's Drawings as Measures of Art Abilities

References

• Ahmad, P.S. (1982). The relationship of field-dependence-independence to subject matter and artistic style preferences of two-dimensional art works. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, E. (1893). A study on children's drawings. Pedagogical Seminary, 2(3), 455–463.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, F. (1972). Artists in the making. New York: Seminar.
   Google Scholar
• Broudy, H.S. (1972). Enlightened cherishing: An essay on aesthetic education. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, H.G. (1915). Measurement of the drawing ability of two thousand one hundred and seventy-seven children in Indiana city school systems by a supplemented Thorndike scale. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(7), 391–408.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A.B. (1897). The child's attitude toward perspective problems. Studies in Education, 1(18), 283–294.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (1987). Chronology: Inquiry about children's drawing abilities and testing of art abilities. In G. Clark, E. Zimmerman, & M. Zurmuehlen (Eds.), Understanding art testings: Past influences, Norman C. Meier's contributions, present concerns, and future possibilities (pp. 110–117). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (1989a). Clark's drawing abilities test. Bloomington, IN: ARTS.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (1989b). Screening and identifying students talented in the visual arts: Clark's drawing abilities test. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 98–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (1992). Using history to design a new drawing abilities test. In P. Amburgy, D. Soucy, M. Stankiewicz, B. Wilson, & M. Wilson (Eds.), The history of art education: Proceedings from the second Penn State conference. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (1984). Educating artistically talented students. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G., Zimmerman, E., & Zurmuehlen, M. (Eds.) (1987). Understanding art testing: Past influences, Norman C. Meier's contributions, present concerns, and future possibilities. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Connecticut State Department of Education. (1980). Connecticut identification manual: Creative arts. Hartford, CT: State Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, E. (1885–1886). On art teaching and child nature. Journal of Education, 8(198), 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• DiLeo, J. H. (1973). Children's drawings as diagnostic aids. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1967). The development of drawing characteristics of culturally advantaged and culturally disadvantaged children. Project #3086. Washington, DC: Office of Education, Bureau of Research.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1972). Educating artistic vision. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F., Asher, J. W., & Hoover, S. M. (1984). Problems in the identification of giftedness, talent, or ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), 149–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Goodenough, F. (1924). The intellectual factor in children's drawings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Goodenough, F. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, E. (1977, Spring). The education of children gifted in the visual arts. Trends In Education, pp. 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnow, J. (1977). Children drawing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, M. (1970). Perceptual style, creativity, and various drawing abilities. Studies in Art Education, 11(2), 51–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gutteter, L. J. (1972). The relationship between the visual and haptic drawing styles and some psychological variables, age, sex, and previous art experience. Studies in Art Education, 14(1), 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. B. (1963). Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity: A revision and extension of Goodenough draw-a-man test. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
   Google Scholar
• Hildreth, G. (1941). The child mind in evolution: A study of developmental sequences in drawing. New York: Kings Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, C., & Smith, L. F. (1945). The Horn art aptitude inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 29, 350–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanoff, E. (1909). Researches experimentales sur le dessin des ecoliers de la Suisse romande: Correlation entre l'aptitude an dessin et les autres aptitudes [Experimental research on the drawing of French speaking Swiss children: Correlation between drawing aptitude and other aptitudes]. Archives de Psychologie, 8, 97–156.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E. (1922). The correlation of visual memory and perception with perspective with drawing ability. School and Society, 15(372), 174–176.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, S. A., & Konstadt, N. I. (1963). Children's embedded figures test. New York: Cognitive Tests.
   Google Scholar
• Kerschensteiner, I. G. (1905). Die entwickelung der zeichnerischen begabung [The development of drawing ability]. Munich: Gerber.
   Google Scholar
• Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children's human figure drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Lark-Horovitz, B. (1941). On learning abilities in children recorded in a drawing experiment: 1. Subject matter and 2. aesthetic and representational qualities. Journal of Experimental Education, 9(4), 332–360.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, H. (1973). Spatial relations in children's drawings: A cross-generational comparison. Studies in Art Education, 15(3), 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lovano-Kerr, J. (1983). Cognitive style revisited: Implications for research in art production and art criticism. Studies in Art Education, 24(3), 195–205.
   Google Scholar
• Manual, H. T. (1919). Talent in drawing: An experimental study of the use of tests to discover special ability. School and Home Education Monograph #3. Bloomington, IL: Public School.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, N. C. (1942). Art in human affairs. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Meumann, E. (1914). Die Analyse des Zeichnens und Modellierens [The analysis of drawing and modelling]. Vorlesungen zur Einfuhrung in die Experimentelle Podagogik [Lectures for an introduction to experimental pedagogy] (pp. 693–775). Leipsig: Englemann.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, T., Lark-Horovitz, B., & Barnhardt, E. N. (1942). Children's art abilities: Studies at the Cleveland Museum of Art. Journal of Experimental Education, 11(2), 97–184.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (1977). Design and drawing skills (Art report #06-A-01). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (1981). Art and young Americans (Art report #10-A-01). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, F. (1974). Le dessin enfantin est-il une ecriture? [Is childish drawing handwriting?]. Enfance, 3(5), 183–216.
   Google Scholar
• Oregon State Department of Education. (1979). Identifying talented and gifted students. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, C. (1887). L'Arte dei Bambini [The art of the child]. Bologna, Italy: N. Zanchelli.
   Google Scholar
• Rouma, G. (1913). Le langage graphique de l'enfant [The child's graphie language]. Paris: Aecan.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, M. J. (1963). A comparison of Witkin's and Lowenfeld's theories of perceptual orientation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, R. J. (1982). Screening and identifying the talented in art. Roeper Review, 4(3), 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, R. (1983). Silver drawing test of cognitive and creative skills. Seattle: Special Child.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. H. (1982). Learning about art: A practical approach. Newport Beach, CA: Romar Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Stalker, M. Z. (1981). Identification of the gifted in art. Studies in Art Education, 22, 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Swassing, R. H. (1985). Teaching gifted children and adolescents. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L. (1913). The measurement of achievement in drawing. Teachers College Record, 14(5), 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L. (1916). Tests of esthetic appreciation. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(10), 509–522.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. (1933–1934). The psychophysical functions differentiating artistically superior from artistically inferior children. In H. S. Langfeld (Ed.), Psychological monographs 45 (pp. 108–133). Princeton, NJ: The Psychological Review.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C., & Meier, N. C. (1936). Artistic ability and general intelligence. Psychological Monographs, 48(1), 95–125.
   Google Scholar
• Van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition: Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes, London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1984). The talent search as an identification model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), 172–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whipple, G. M. (1919). Classes for gifted children. Bloomington, IL: Public School.
   Google Scholar
• Whitford, W. G. (1919a). Empirical study of pupil-ability in public-school art courses—Part 1. The Elementary School Journal, 10(1), 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Whitford, W. G. (1919b). Empirical study of pupil-ability in public-school art courses—Part II. The Elementary School Journal, 10(2), 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., Hurwitz, A., & Wilson, M. (1987). Teaching drawing from art. Worcester, MA: Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1977). An iconoclastic view of the imagery sources in the drawings of young people. Art Education, 30(1), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1979). Figure structure, figure action, and framing in drawings by American and Egyptian children. Studies in Art Education, 21(1), 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Wilson, B. (1982). Teaching children to draw: A guide for teachers and parents. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Youngblood, M. (1979). A non-verbal ability test. Studies in Art Education, 20(3), 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, E. (1983). Cognitive style and related educational issues: New directions for research in art education. Journal of Art and Design Education, 2(1), 15–30.
   Google Scholar