Art Education in the 1990s: Meeting the Challenges of Accountability

References

• Art Educators of New Jersey. (1988). New Jersey visual arts goals and standards, k-12. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Askin, W. (1986). Evaluating the advanced placement portfolio in studio art. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, D. K. (1990). An analysis of the Dutch VWO visual arts examination program and the concomitant VWO curriculum. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 02A. (University Microfilms No. AAC9110860)
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G., Zimmerman, E., & Zurmuehlen, M. (Eds.) (1987). Understanding art testing: Past influences, Norman C. Meier's contributions, present concerns, and future possibilities. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, B. S. (1988). Effects of the reform movement on the evaluation of teachers: The Texas experience. Design for Arts in Education, 89(4), 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• College Entrance Examination Board. (1983). Academic preparation for college: What students need to know and be able to do. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• College Entrance Examination Board. (1985). Academic preparation in the arts: Teaching for transition from high school to college. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• College Entrance Examination Board. (1986). Assessment in the arts. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. J. (1979). The visual arts—a classroom myth or an accountable program? National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 63(430), 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. J. (1986, September). ExCET … examination for the certification of teachers. Texas Association of Schools of Art Newsletter, pp. 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Day, M. D. (1985). Evaluating student achievement in discipline-based art programs. Studies in Art Education, 26(4), 232–240.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, C. M. (1988). School arts evaluation: Its form and substance. Design for Arts in Education, 89(1), 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, C. M. (1989). The Florida state initial teacher certification test: A case study. Design for Arts in Education, 90(4), 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, C. M. (1990). An annotated bibliography on evaluation and testing in visual arts education. Design for Arts in Education, 91(3), 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, D. W., & Baker, T. L. (1984). Multiple perception analysis: A convergence model for evaluating arts education. Studies in Art Education, 25(4), 245–250.
   Google Scholar
• Education Commission of the States. (1983). A summary of major reports on education. Denver: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service. (1988). AP course description: Art. Princeton, NJ: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Testing Service to design new assessment test for beginning art teachers. (1990, November). NAEA News, p. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1989). Zero-based arts education: An introduction to ARTS PROPEL. Studies in Art Education, 30(2), 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Getty Center for Education in the Arts. (1985). Beyond creating: The place for art in America's schools. Los Angeles: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gitomer, D., Grosh, S., & Price, K. (1992). Portfolio culture in arts education. Art Education, 45(1), 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, W. D., & Hoepfner, R. (1986). Achievement testing in the visual arts. Design for Arts in Education, 88(1), 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hamblen, K. A. (1986). Testing in art: A view from the classroom. Design for Arts in Education, 88(1), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. (1988). Back to the future: Reflections on present day emphases in curriculum and evaluation. Art Education, 41(2), 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hoepfner, R. (1984). Measuring student achievement in art. Studies in Art Education, 25(4), 251–258.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes Group Executive Board. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Illinois State Board of Education, (n.d.). Art criticism as a basis for educational evaluation. Springfield, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• NAEA members appointed to Professional Teaching Standards Committee. (1991, February). NAEA News, pp. 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• National Endowment for the Arts. (1988). Toward civilization: A report on arts education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, R. J. (1986). Testing in elementary school art for growth and grades. Design for Arts in Education, 88(1), 48–50.
   Google Scholar
• Schonau, D. W. (1989). National final examinations in the visual arts in The Netherlands: Practices and policies. Visual Arts Research, 15(1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schonau, D. W. (1991). Nationwide assessment of studio work in Dutch secondary education. Journal of Art and Design Education, 10(1), 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, C. B., Allington, D., Ellison, R. L., & Guest, C. W. (1985). Evaluating a conceptually based course of study. Art Education, 38(2), 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency, (n.d.). Art education: Planning for teaching and learning. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Twiggs, L. F. (1986). On art education and testing in a period of educational reform. Design for Arts in Education, 88(1), 51–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, B. J. (1982). A look at students' art achievements: Results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Visual Arts Research, 8(16), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (1986). Testing and the process of change. Design for Arts in Education, 88(1), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, D. P., & Pistone, N. (1991). Taking full measure: Rethinking assessment through the arts. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, T., & Wolf, D. P. (1984). How should we measure arts achievement? Design for Arts in Education, 85(3), 35–40.
   Google Scholar