Math and Art Curriculum Integration: A Post-Modern Foundation

References

• Bauch, P. (1985). Unpublished lecture, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Berlak, H. (1992). Toward the development of a new science of educational testing and assessment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouleris, J. (1991). Measuring up: Teaching geometry through art. School Arts, 91(3) 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, J. (1992). Fractals: The patterns of chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Brigham, D. L. (1989). Focus on the fine arts: Visual arts. Washington, DC: NEA Professional Library.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics addenda series grades 9–12: A core curriculum making mathematics count for everyone. (1992). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Doll, W. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teacher College Press.
   Google Scholar
• D'Amico, V., & Ostrander, M.Y. (1940). The visual arts in general education. In A Report of the Committee on the Function of Art in General Education for the Commission on Secondary School Curriculum of the Progressive Education Association. New York: Appleton-Century Company.
   Google Scholar
• Etheridge, B. (1990). Integrated learning: What, why, how. Raleigh, NC: Division of Curriculum and Instruction, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (Original work published 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. (Trans.) New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Francis, G., with Collins, B. (1992). On knot-spanning surfaces: An illustrated essay on topological art. Leonardo, 25(3–4), 313–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, B.R. (1985). The natural sciences and the humanities. In C.E. Finn, Jr., D. Ravitch, & P.H. Roberts (Eds.). Challenges to the humanities. New York: Holmes and Meier.
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E.H. (1960). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hass, G. (1977). Curriculum planning: A new approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L.D. (1989). The fourth dimension: Non-Euclidean geometry in modern art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogben, L. (1993). Mathematics for the millions: How to master the magic of numbers. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. (Reprinted from 1937 edition).
   Google Scholar
• Hurwitz, A., & Day, M. (1991). Children and their art. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1978). Edmund Husserl's the origin of geometry: An introduction by Jacques Derrida. (John P. Leavey, Trans.). Stoney Brook, NY: Nicolas Hays, Ltd. (Original work published 1936).
   Google Scholar
• Ivins, W.M. (1946). Art and geometry: A study in space intuitions. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Kaelin, E.F. (1989). An aesthetics for art educators. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenfeld, V. & Brittain, W.L. (1975). Creative and mental growth (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc. (Original work published 1964).
   Google Scholar
• Maker, C.J. (1982). Teaching models in education of the gifted. Rockville, MD: An Aspen Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori method. (A.E. George, Trans.). New York: Schocken Books. (Original work published in 1909).
   Google Scholar
• Panofsky, I. (1991). Perspective as symbolic form. (C.S. Wood, Trans.). New York: Zone Books. (Original work published in 1924–25).
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1960). The child's conception of geometry. (E.A. Lunzer). New York: Basic Books, Inc. (Original work published 1956).
   Google Scholar
• Shlain, L. (1991). Art & physics: Parallel visions in space, time & light. New York: Marrow.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (1983). Experience and art: Teaching children to paint. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sowell, K. (1993). Unpublished lecture notes, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S., & Norman, J. (1979). The mathematics of Islamic art. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, G.A. (1971). The theory and practice of perspective. New York: Benjamin Bloom. (Reprinted from 1910 edition).
   Google Scholar
• Struik, D.J. (1948, revised edition 1987). A concise history of mathematics. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unifying concepts in mathematics: A text designed for elementary school teachers. (1975). The University of Maryland Mathematics Project. Sarasota, FL: Omni Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vitz, P.C., & Glimcher, A.B. (1984). Modern art and modern science. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, G., & Hooe, L. (1907). Practical drawing modern arts course, book seven. New York: Prang Educational Company.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (1987). The birth and rebirth of pictorial space. New York: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1979). The geometrical foundation of natural structure. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W. (1977). Principles of three-dimensional design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
   Google Scholar