References
- Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
- Balkema, A. W., & Slager, H. (Eds.) (2004). Artistic research. (Lier en Boog) Series of Philosophy of Art and Art Theory, Vol. 18. Amsterdam: Dutch Society of Aesthetics.
- Barone, T. (2001). Science, art, and the predispositions of educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 30(7), 24–28.
- Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (1997). Arts-based Educational Research. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education (2nd ed.) (pp. 73–116). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Brown, N. C. M. (2003). Art as a practice of research. Proceedings of the 31st InSEA World Congress, August, 2002. InSEA Member Presentations: Papers and Workshops CD-ROM. New York: The Center for International Art Education Inc., Teachers College Columbia University.
- Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism: Congruence and critique. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
- Bullough, R. V., Jr., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.
- Cahnmann, M. (2003). The craft, practice, and possibility of poetry in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 29–36.
- Candlin, F. (2000). Practice-based doctorates and questions of academic legitimacy. Journal of Art and Design Education, 19(1), 96–101.
- Chatterji, M. (2005). Evidence on “what works”: An argument for extended-term mixed-methods (ETMM) evaluation designs. Educational Research, 34(5), 14–24.
- Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (Eds.). (2001). Lives in context: The art of life history research. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
- Cole, A. L., Neilson, L., Knowles, J. G., & Luciani, T. (2004). Provoked by art: Theorizing arts-informed research. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Backalong Books.
- Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Danto, A. C. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace: A philosophy of art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Diamond, C. T. P., & Mullen, C. A. (Eds.). (1999). The postmodern educator: Arts-based inquiries and teacher development. New York: Peter Lang.
- Diaz-Kommonen, L. (2002). Art, fact and artifact production. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.
- Efland, A. D. (1990). A history of art education: Intellectual and social currents in teaching the visual arts. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Eisner, E. W. (1993). Forms of understanding and the future of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(7), 5–11.
- Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Eisner, E. W. (2003). On the art and science of qualitative research in psychology. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 17–29). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
- Eisner, E. W., & Peshkin, A. (Eds.). (1990). Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Fox, G. T. (2001). Creating research questions from strategies and perspectives of contemporary art. Curriculum Inquiry, 31(1), 33–49.
- Frayling, C. (1997). Practice-based doctorates in the creative and performing arts and design. Lichfield, UK: UK Council for Graduate Education. Retrieved October 26, 2003 from http://www.ukcge.ac.uk/report_downloads.html
- Greene, M. (2003). The arts and social justice. In P. Sahasrabudhe (Ed.), Art Education: Meaning dimensions and possibilities, Keynote addresses, The 31st InSEA World Congress, August 2002 (pp. 21–25). New York: Center for International Art Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
- Green, H. (Ed.). (2001). Research training in the creative and performing arts and design. Lichfield, UK: UK Council for Graduate Education. Retrieved December 14, 2003 from http://www.ukcge.ac.uk/report_downloads.html
- Harris, M. (Ed.). (1996). Review of postgraduate education. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England. Retrieved December 22, 2003, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/Pubs/hefce/1996/m14_96.htm
- Hockney, D. (1993). That's the way I see it. San Francisco, CA: Chronicle Books.
- Davis, Hoffmann J. (2003). Balancing the whole: Portraiture as methodology. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 199–217). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
- Hughes, R. (1993). Culture of complaint: The fraying of America. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Irwin, R., & de Cosson, A. (Eds.). (2004). A/R/Tography: Rendering self through arts-based living enquiry. Vancouver, BC: Pacific Educational Press.
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
- Jipson, J. A., & Paley, N. (Eds.). (1997). Daredevil research: Re-creating analytic practice. New York: Peter Lang.
- Macleod, K., & Holdridge, L. (Eds.). (2006). Thinking through art: Reflections on art as research. New York: Routledge.
- McNiff, S. (1998). Art-based research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publications.
- Mitchell, C., Weber, C., & O'Reilly-Scanlon, K. (Eds.) (2005). Who do we think we are?: Methodologies for self-study. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Neilsen, L., Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (Eds.) (2001). The art of writing inquiry. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Backalong Books.
- Nochlin, L. (1988). Women, art, and power and other essays. New York: Harper & Row.
- Pink, S. (2001). Doing visual ethnography: Images, media, and representation in research. London: Sage.
- Raney, K. (2003). Art in question. London: Continuum, The Arts Council of England.
- Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Learning from attempts to improve schooling: The contribution of methodological diversity. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 25–31.
- Reed-Danahay, D. E. (Ed.). (1997). Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social. Oxford, UK: Berg.
- Refsum, G. (2002). Bete comme un peintre? Contribution to an understanding of the knowledge base in the field of visual arts. Selected Working Papers in Art & Design, Volume 2. Retrieved September 14, 2003 from http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/papers/wpades/vol2/refsumfull.html
- Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (Eds.). (1994). The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Scheurich, J. J. (1997). Research method in the postmodern. London: The Falmer Press.
- Singerman, H. (1999). Art subjects: Making artists in the American university. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Smith, S., & Watson, J. (Ed.) (2002). Interfaces: Women, autobiography, image, performance. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
- Strand, D. (1998). Research in the creative arts. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
- Stronach, I., & MacLure, M. (1997). Educational research undone: The postmodern embrace. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Sullivan, G. (2001). Artistic thinking as transcognitive practice: A reconciliation of the process-product dichotomy. Visual Arts Research, 27(1), 2–12.
- Sullivan, G. (2004). Studio art as research practice. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 795–814). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- U.S. Congress. (2001). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law 107–110, 107th Congress. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.