Paraprofessionals: Gatekeepers of Authentic Art Production

References

• Anderson, F. E. (1978). Art for all the children: A creative sourcebook for the impaired child. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. (1983). Perceiving, thinking, forming. Art Education, 36(2), 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ashbaker, B., & Morgan, J. (2001). Growing roles for teacher aids. Education Digest, 66, 60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bensur, B. (2002). Frustrated voices of art assessment. Art Education, 55(6), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Blandy, D. (1989). Ecological and normalizing approaches to disabled students and art education. Art Education, 42(3), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Blandy, D. (1991). Conceptions of disability: Toward a sociopolitical orientation to disability for art education. Studies in Art Education, 32(2), 131–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Broer, S., Doyle, M.B., & Giangreco, M. (2005). Perspective of students with intellectual disabilities about their experiences with paraprofessional support. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 415–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubeck, T. (1981). The arts: A great resource for disabled people. American Rehabilitation, 7, 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, G. (1999). Adapting arts activities or success for all. Unpublished master’s thesis. St. Norbert College, De Pere, WI. ED440910.
   Google Scholar
• Causton-Theoharis, J. N., & Malmgren, K. (2005a). Building bridges: Strategies to help paraprofessionals promote peer interaction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(6), 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Causton-Theoharis, J.N., & Malmgren, K. (2005b). Increasing peer interactions for students with severe disabilities via paraprofessional training. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dake, D., & Caldwell, B. (2000). The changing face of art education. School Arts, 99, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Dalke, C. (1984). There are no cows here: Art and special education-together at last. Art Education, 37(6), 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dalley, T. (Ed.) (1984). Art as therapy: An introduction to the use of art as a therapeutic technique. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. M., & Watson, N. (2001). Where are the children’s experiences? Analyzing social and cultural exclusion in ‘special’ and ‘mainstream’ schools. Disability & Society, 16(5), 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWalt, K. M., DeWalt, B. R., & Wayland, C. B. (1998). Participant observation. In H. R. Bernard (Ed.), Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology (pp. 259–299). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enderle, M. (2007). Accessing art: Assistive technology and students with physical disabilities. Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. Retrieved 5/15/07 from http://www.wati.org/
   Google Scholar
• Frame, C. (1992). Access to the arts through assistive technology. Young Artist Workshops, St. Norbert College, West De Pere, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Furniss, G. (2007). Practical considerations for teaching artists with autism. School Arts, 106(9), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, L. (1997). Enhancing art teacher education with new technologies: Research possibilities and practices. Art Education, 50(5), 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, K. (2004). Let’s team up! A checklist for paraeducators, teachers and principals. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Giangreco, M.F., Broer, S.M., & Edelman, S.W. (2001). Teacher engagement with students with disabilities: Differences based on paraprofessional service delivery models. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giangreco, M.F., & Doyle, M.B. (2002). Students with disabilities and paraprofessional supports: Benefits, balance, and band-aids. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(7), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giangreco, M. (2003). Working with paraprofessionals. Educational Leadership, 61(2), 50–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoire, M. & Lupinetti, J. (2005). Supporting diversity through the arts. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 41(4), 159–164.
   Google Scholar
• Guay, D. (1994). Students with disabilities in the art classroom: How prepared are we? Studies in Art Education, 36(1), 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Guay, D. (2003). Paraeducators in the art classrooms: Issues of culture, leadership and special needs. Studies in Art Education, 45(1), 20–39.
   Google Scholar
• Guay, D., & Gerlach, K. (2006). Clarifying roles for paraeducators in the art room. In B. L. Gerber & D. M. Guay (Eds.), Reaching and teaching students with special needs through art (pp 189–205). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gude, O. (2007). Rubric for a quality art education curriculum. Spiral Art Curriculum. Retrieved June 18, 2007 from http://www.uic.edu/classes/ad/ad382/sites/AEA/AEA02/AAEA02a.html
   Google Scholar
• Henry, C., Banks, S., Day, M., Dunn, P., Fergus, B., Foster, L., Galbraith, L., Hatfield, T., Hansen, M., & Young, B. (1999). Standards for Art Teacher Preparation. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hillert, M. S. (1997). The problematic nature of art teacher’s efforts to adapt instruction for special needs students. Unpublished master’s thesis, St. Norbert College, De Pere, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Karamanol, A., & Salley, L. (2005). Adaptive art education. School Arts, 104(5), 27.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. & Roland, C. (2006). The future of art education. School Art, 106(2), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M.L. (2001). A historical/legal analysis and case study of a high school art classroom as a least restrictive environment for students experiencing disabilities. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas Tech University, United States—Texas. Retrieved September 14, 2007, from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database (Publication No. AAT 3005249). Kraft, M.L.(2004). Least restrictive environment: Policy analysis and case study of a high school art class. Visual Arts Research, 29(1), 22-35.
   Google Scholar
• Malmgren, K., & Causton-Theoharis J. (2006). Boy in the bubble: Effects of paraprofessional proximity and other pedagogical decisions on the interactions of a student with behavioral disorders. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(4), 301–312.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory into practice. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, A. (1989). Restructuring the schools: The role of paraprofessionals. Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association, Center for Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J.M., & Janeczko, D. (1991). Adapting art instruction for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(1), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, M. (1999). Access to art education: Ethical and legal perspectives. In A. L. Nyman and A. M. Jenkins (Eds.), Issues and approaches to art for students with special needs (pp. 7–16). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, M. (2006). Reading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 13.
   Google Scholar
• Sowers, J. (1991). Transitioning students with physical and multiple disabilities to supported employment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 1(4), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, B. (1991). Eligibility/Exclusion issues in the 1990 trial state assessment. Evanston IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, I. (1992). Recent approaches to art instruction in special education: A review of the literature. Retrieved 06/15/07 from the ERIC database (ERIC # ED 349724).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2005). Access and support in the development of a visual language: Arts education and disabled students. Disability and Society, 20(7), 763–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2004). 25th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act, Vol 1. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, B. (2005). Winning with art. School Arts, 104(9), 48.
   Google Scholar
• Weibe-Zederayko, M., & Ward, K. (1999). What to do when students can’t hold a pencil. Art Education, 52(4), 5.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E. (1996). Commentary: What drawing by atypical populations can tell us. Visual Arts Research, 22, 90–96.
   Google Scholar
• Wolery, M., Werts, M., Caldwell, N., Snyder, E., & Liskowski, L. (1995). Experienced teachers’ perceptions of resource and supports for inclusion. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Zamierowski, M. J. (1980). The integration of psychoanalytical and neurophysiological approaches into art therapy framework for the treatment of children with learning disabilities. Pratt Institute Creative Arts Therapy Review, 1, 5.
   Google Scholar