Forget This Article: On Scholarly Oblivion, Institutional Amnesia, and Erasure of Research History

References

• Abrahamson, R. (1972). The development of an instrument for measuring the degree of divergent responses revealed in clay images formed by first grade school children. Studies in Art Education, 14(1), 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstine, D. (1965). Needed research and the role of definitions in art education. Studies in Art Education, 7(1), 2–17.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, M. (1957). The research committee and the nature of research in art education. Art Education, 10(5), 10–12, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, M. (Ed.). (1954). Research in Art Education: NAEA 5th Yearbook. State Teachers College, Kutztown, PA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, M. (Ed.). (1956). Research in Art Education: NAEA 7th Yearbook. State Teachers College, Kutztown, PA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, M., & Hausman, J. (1956). Two pilot studies with the purpose of clarifying hypotheses for research into creative behavior. Research in Art Education, 7th Yearbook (pp. 126–141). State Teachers College, Kutztown, PA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, C. (1999). Shame and forgetting in the information age. In C. Baxter (Ed.), The business of memory: The art of remembering in an age of forgetting (pp. 141–57). St. Paul, MN: Graywolf.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, C. (Ed.). (1999). The business of memory: The art of remembering in an age of forgetting. St. Paul, MN: Graywolf.
   Google Scholar
• Beittel, K. (1961). Editorial. Studies in Art Education, 2(2), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Beittel, K. (1978). Inquiry into the qualitative world of creating: The S-E model. Studies in Art Education, 20(1), 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Beittel, K., & Lowenfeld, V. (1959). Interdisciplinary criteria in the arts and sciences: A progress report. Research in Art Education, 9th Yearbook (pp. 35–44). Washington, DC: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Blandy, D. (2008). Editorial: Legacies and lineages. Studies in Art Education, 50(1), 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, S. (1969). An introductory study of art as creative learning for the rural culturally disadvantaged. Studies in Art Education, 10(2), 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bresler, L. (Ed.). (2007). International handbook of research in arts education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, D. (1998). Survey of current research in art education. Studies in Art Education, 39(2), 183–186.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, J. (2001). Lowenfeld: An(other) look. Art Education, 54(6), 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, G. (2006). Of Kuia and Kaumatua (Guest Editorial). Studies in Art Education, 47(4), 291–293.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, L. (1978). Editorial: Value orientations in art education theory and research. Studies in Art Education, 19(2), 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D., & Connelly F. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. (1967). Research trends in art and art education. Studies in Art Education, 20(7), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. (1971). Research in art education: An overview. Art Education, 24(5), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. (1977). Research trends in art and art education: 1883-1972. In S. Madeja (Ed.), Arts and aesthetics: An agenda for the future (pp. 109–147). St. Louis, MO: CEMREL.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, D. (1965). Editorial. Studies in Art Education, 7(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker. D. (1974). Teaching art criticism as aesthetic inquiry. Curriculum Theory Network, 4(2/3), 112–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efland, E. (1971). The transition continued: The emergence of an affective revolution. Studies in Art Education, 13(1), 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (1969). The drawings of the disadvantaged: A comparative study. Studies in Art Education, 11(1), 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E., & Day, M. (2004). Handbook of research and policy in art education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Elkind, D. (2007). The power of play: How spontaneous, imaginative activities lead to happier, healthier children. New York: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson. M. (1977). Uses of history in art education. Studies in Art Education, 18(3), 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson. M. (1979). Historical thinking and aesthetic education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 13(4), 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson. M. (1983). Teaching art history as an inquiry process. Art Education, 36(5), 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson. M. (1985). Styles of historical investigation. Studies in Art Education, 26(2), 121–124.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T., Irons, I., & Fischer, R. (1961). Patterns in art and science: Their creation, evolution, and correspondence. Studies in Art Education, 2(2), 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2003). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freyberger, R. (1956). Differences in the creative drawings of children of varying ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds in Pennsylvania based on samplings of grades one through six. Research in Art Education, 7th Yearbook (pp. 115–125). State Teachers College, Kutztown, PA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Galvan, J. (2006). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (1974). A teaching strategy for clarifying aesthetic values. Art Education, 27(7), 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, D. (2000). Lost time: On remembering and forgetting in late modern culture. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hafeli, M. (1999). Drawing and painting in the middle school: Intentions, decisions and judgments of students and their teachers. Ed.D. dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College. Retrieved January 15, 2008, from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (Publication No. AAT 9921386).
   Google Scholar
• Hafeli, M. (2000). Negotiating “fit” in student art work: Classroom conversations. Studies in Art Education, 41(2), 130–145.
   Google Scholar
• Hafeli, M. (2001). Encountering student learning. Art Education, 54(6), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hamblen, K. (1988). What does DBAE teach? Art Education, 41(2), 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hamblen, K. (1989). Research in art education as a form of educational consumer protection. Studies in Art Education, 31(1), 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hamblen, K., & Smith, S. (1994). Identifying a research art style in art education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 4-8, 1994. ED 376 188.
   Google Scholar
• Hardiman, G., & Zernich, T. (1976). Research in art education 1970-74: Portrayal and interpretation. Art Education, 29(2), 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science imagination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, F. (1961). The future of research in art education. Studies in Art Education, 3(1), 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. (1959). Editorial. Studies in Art Education, 1(1), 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. (Ed.). (1959). Research in Art Education: NAEA 9th Yearbook. Washington, DC: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hoepfner, R., Silverman, R., & Hendricks, M. (1969). Developing and evaluating art curricula for disadvantaged youth. Studies in Art Education, 11(1), 20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffa, H. (1987). Research as caring skepticism. Design for Arts in Education, 88(5), 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, P. (1979). An art appreciation teaching model for visual aesthetic education. Studies in Art Education, 20(3), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, I. (1956). Preface. Research in Art Education: NAEA 7th Yearbook. State Teachers College, Kutztown, PA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (2007). Defining a literature. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 139–147.
   Google Scholar
• Korzenik, D. (1976). Creativity: Producing solutions to a problem. Studies in Art Education, 17(2), 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, C., Rush, J., & Kratochwill, T. (1979). The effects of descriptive social reinforcement on creative responses in children’s easel painting. Studies in Art Education, 20(2), 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kundera, M. (1984). The unbearable lightness of being. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Lanier, V. (1959). Implications of the concept of action research. Studies in Art Education, 1(1), 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lanier, V. (1974-75). Conception and priority in art education research. Studies in Art Education, 16(1), 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, F. (1975). Up date ’75: Growth in American art education. Studies in Art Education, 17(1), 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• McFee, J. (1960). Research in art education. Studies in Art Education, 2(1), 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• McFee, J. (1966). Editorial. Studies in Art Education, 7(2), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. (1997). The value of replicating social-science research. Chronicle of Higher Education, 43(22), B7.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, C. (1959). Creative work within a group: Its situational factors. Research in Art Education, 9th Yearbook. Washington, DC: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• NAEA Commission on Research in Art Education. (1994). Art education: Creating a visual arts research agenda toward the 21st century: A final report: 1994. Art Education, 47(4), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Neperud, R. (1969). Visual arts instruction in primitive societies: Its implications for art education. Studies in Art Education, 10(2), 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Packard, S. (1973). Creative tempo in children’s art production. Studies in Art Education, 14(3), 18–26.
   Google Scholar
• Paley, V. (2005). A child’s work: The importance of fantasy play. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, J. (1984). Editorial: “Does anyone read Studies any more?” Studies in Art Education, 25(3), 139–140.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, I. (1956). Relationships between certain aspects of creative expression and reading development. Research in Art Education, 7th Yearbook (pp. 103–114). State Teachers College, Kutztown, PA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Salome, R. (1968). Perceptual training in reading readiness and implications for art education. Studies in Art Education, 10(1), 58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, M. (1940). A summary of scientific investigations relating to art. Unpublished master’s thesis, Baylor University, Waco, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Tavin, K. (2005). Opening re-marks: Critical antecedents of visual culture in art education. Studies in Art Education, 47(1), 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, E. (1998). Further commentary: Response to Burton’s Survey of Current Research in Art Education. Studies in Art Education, 39(2), 187–189.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, E. (Ed.) (1996). Briefing papers: Creating a visual arts research agenda toward the 21st century. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, E., Chalmers, G., Hausman, J., & Stockrocki, M. (2007, March). Old wine in new bottles: What is wisdom in art education? Paper presented at the meeting of the National Art Education Association, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar