Assessment Assemblage: Advancing Portfolio Practice through the Assessment Staging Theory

References

• Boughton, D. (2007). Assessing art learning in changing contexts: High-stakes accountability, international standards and changing conceptions of artistic development. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 585–605). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, T. M. (2008). Developing a bundled visual arts assessment model. Visual Arts Research, 34(1), 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, L. H. (2004). No child left behind in art? Arts Education Policy Review, 106(2), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, M., & Forde, E. (2001). Designing teaching and assessment methods for diverse student populations. Journal of Art and Design Education, 20(1), 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (1989). Screening and identifying students talented in the visual arts: Clark’s drawing abilities test. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(3), 98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, H. J. (2008). The assessment triad: Piecing together an assessment framework for the Arts. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University Department of Art Education at Bloomington.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, C. M. (2002). The teacher as stakeholder in student art assessment and art program evaluation. Art Education, 55(4), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, C. M. (2003). Models for assessing art performance (MAAP): A K-12 project. Studies in Art Education, 44(4), 350–370.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, C. M., Madeja, S. S., & Sabol, F. R. (2004). Assessing expressive learning: A practical guide for teacher-directed, authentic assessment in K-12 visual arts education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, M. (2004). Psychology of learning for instruction, 3rd edition. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1996). Overview of evaluation and assessment: Concepts in search of practice. In D. Boughton, E. W. Eisner, & J. Ligtvoet (Eds.) Evaluating and assessing the visual arts in education: International perspectives (pp.1–16). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W, & Day, M. D. (Eds). (2004). Handbook of research and policy in art education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons, D. (2008). Digital portfolios in visual arts classrooms. Art Education, 61(5), 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Gadsden, V. L. (2008). The arts and education: Knowledge generation, pedagogy, and the discourse of learning. Review of Research in Education, 32, 29–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, D. D., & Hobbs, J. A. (2002). Historical assessment in art education. Art Education, 55(6), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Habib, L., & Wittek, L. (2007). The portfolio as artifact and actor. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(4), 266–282.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, R. A. (1995). Examining the costs of performance assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 8(2), 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, T. (2006). Domain poisoning: The redundancy of current models of assessment through art. Journal of Art and Design Education, 25(3), 268–274.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B., & Soep, E. (1998). Living the arts through language + learning. Americans for the Arts Monographs, 2(7), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T., & Anderson, K. T. (2007). Situative approaches to student assessment: Contextualizing evidence to support practice. In P. Moss (Ed.), Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Evidence and Decision Making (pp. 264–287). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T., Honeyford, M. A., Clinton, K. A., & McWilliams, J. (in press). Measuring new media and technology proficiencies: Not so fast! In V. J. Schute & B. Becker (Eds.), Innovative assessment in the 21st century: Supporting educational needs. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T., Zuiker, S. J., Taasoobshirazi, G., Schafer, N. J., & Michael, M. A. (2006). Balancing varied assessment functions to attain systemic validity: Three is the magic number. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 180–201.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, H. H. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment K-12. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, A. (2005). Arts assessments for Washington state performance based and classroom based assessments: The journey in progress. New Horizons for Learning. Retrieved from www.newhorizons.org/strategies/assess/joseph.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, G. (2003). The Croce-Collingwood theory as theory. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61(2), 171–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273–290.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenfeld, V. (1947). Creative and mental growth. New York, NY: Macmillan Co.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, R. (1992). A short guide to alternative assessment practices. Art Education, 45(6), 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R., & Steers, J. (2006). The impact of formal assessment procedures on teaching and learning in art and design in secondary schools. Journal of Art and Design Education, 25(2), 119–133.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Assessing achievement in the arts. British Journal of Aesthetics, 33(2), 99–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz, W. C. (1961). The art of assemblage. New York, NY: The Museum of Modern Art.
   Google Scholar
• Siegesmund, R., Diket, R., & McColloch, S. (2001). Re-visioning NAEP: Amending a performance assessment for middle school art students. Studies in Art Education, 43(1), 45–56. South Carolina Arts Assessment Program (n.d.). Retrieved from http://scaap.ed.sc.edu/ContactInfo.asp
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (2008). Teacher perspectives on No Child Left Behind and arts education: A case study. Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Springgay, S., & Freedman, D. (2007). Curriculum and the cultural body. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar