REFERENCES
- Carpenter, B. S. (2005). The return of visual culture (Why not?). Art Education, 58(6), 4–5.
- Carter, M. C. (2009). Response to Tavin’s “The magical quality of aesthetics.” Studies in Art Education, 50(4), 400–404.
- Chapman, L. H. (1967). Subject matter for the study of art. Art Education, 20(2), 20–22. doi:10.2307/3190925
- Derrida, J. (1994). Spectres of Marx. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Duncum, P. (2002). Clarifying visual culture: Art education. Art Education, 55(3), 6–11. doi:10.2307/3193995
- Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics and the social life of art. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Grubbs, J. (2012). Adding a chapter to art education history: Visual culture curriculum. Visual Inquiry: Learning and Teaching Art, 1(1), 9–19.
- Hetrick, L. (2010). Exploring pedagogical fantasies in those learning to teach art. Visual Arts Research, 36(2), 38–48. doi:10.1353/var.2010.0014
- jagodzinski, j. (2004). Youth fantasies: The perverse landscape of the media. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
- jagodzinski, j. (2007). Art education in an age of teletechnology: On the impossibility of portraiture. Social Theory in Art Education, 27, 75–95.
- jagodzinski, j. (2010). The site/sight/cite of Jacques Lacan or forget Slavoj Zizek? Implications for art and education. Visual Arts Research, 36(2), 15–37. doi:10.1353/var.2010.0013
- Johnston, A. (2013). Jacques Lacan. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lacan
- Kamhi, M., Duncum, P., & Tavin, K. (2007). Letters to the editor. Art Education, 60(5), 5–52.
- Kristof, N. (2016, May 7). A confession of liberal intolerance. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/opinion/sunday/a-confession-of-liberal-intolerance.html
- Tavin, K. (2003). Wrestling with angels, searching for ghosts: Toward a critical pedagogy of visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 197–213.
- Tavin, K. (2005a). Hauntological shifts: Fear and loathing of popular (visual) culture. Studies in Art Education, 46(2), 101–117.
- Tavin, K. M. (2005b). Opening re-marks: Critical antecedents of visual culture in art education. Studies in Art Education, 47(1), 5–22.
- Tavin, K. (2007). Eyes wide shut: The use and uselessness of the discourse of aesthetics in art education. Art Education, 60(2), 40–45.
- Tavin, K. (2008). The magical quality of aesthetics: Art education’s objet a (and the new math). Studies in Art Education, 49(3), 268–271.
- Tavin, K. (2010). Six acts of miscognition: Implications for art education. Studies in Art Education, 52(1), 55–68.
- Thomas, B. (2012). Psychologizing and the anti-psychologist: Dewey, Lacan, and contemporary art education. Studies in Art Education, 53(4), 330–346.
- Wilson, B. (2003). Of diagrams and rhizomes: Visual culture, contemporary art, and the impossibility of mapping the content of art education. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 214–229.
- Wilson, B., & Thompson, C. (2007). Pedagogy and the visual culture of children and youth. Visual Arts Research, 33(2), 1–5.
- Zizek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London, England: Verso.